Comparison of two packable hemostatic gauze dressings in a porcine hemorrhage model

Richard B Schwartz, Bradford Zahner Reynolds, Stephen A Shiver, E. Brooke Lerner, Eric Mark Greenfield, Ricaurte A. Solis, Nicholas A. Kimpel, Phillip L Coule, John G. McManus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains the primary cause of preventable battlefield mortality and a significant cause of domestic civilian mortality. Rapid hemorrhage control is crucial for survival. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze are commercially available products marketed for rapid hemorrhage control. These products were selected because they are packable gauze that work via differing mechanisms of action (tissue adhesion versus procoagulant). Objective. To compare the effectiveness of ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze in controlling arterial hemorrhage in a swine model. Methods. Fourteen swine were studied. Following inguinal dissection and after achieving minimum hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≥70 mmHg), a femoral arterial injury was created using a 6-mm vascular punch. Free bleeding was allowed for 45 seconds, and then the wound was packed alternatively with ChitoGauze or Combat Gauze. Direct pressure was applied to the wound for 2 minutes, followed by a three-hour monitoring period. Resuscitation fluids were administered to maintain an MAP of ≥65 mmHg. Time to hemostasis, hemodynamic parameters, total blood loss, and amount of resuscitation fluid were recorded every 15 minutes. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Histologic sections of the vessels were examined using regular and polarized light. Results. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding any measured end point. Data trends, however, favor ChitoGauze over Combat Gauze for time to hemostasis, fluid requirements, and blood loss. There was no evidence of retained foreign material on histologic analysis. Conclusion. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze appear to be equally efficacious in their hemostatic properties, as demonstrated in a porcine hemorrhage model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)477-482
Number of pages6
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Hemostatics
Bandages
Swine
Hemorrhage
Nonparametric Statistics
Hemostasis
Resuscitation
Arterial Pressure
Wounds and Injuries
Hemodynamics
Tissue Adhesions
Mortality
Groin
Thigh
Blood Vessels
Dissection
Light
Pressure

Keywords

  • ChitoGauze
  • Combat Gauze
  • Combat medicine
  • Gunshot wound
  • Hemorrhage
  • Hemostatic agent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

Comparison of two packable hemostatic gauze dressings in a porcine hemorrhage model. / Schwartz, Richard B; Reynolds, Bradford Zahner; Shiver, Stephen A; Lerner, E. Brooke; Greenfield, Eric Mark; Solis, Ricaurte A.; Kimpel, Nicholas A.; Coule, Phillip L; McManus, John G.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.10.2011, p. 477-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{882cd3571e95408bbd6de4a091eb647c,
title = "Comparison of two packable hemostatic gauze dressings in a porcine hemorrhage model",
abstract = "Background. Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains the primary cause of preventable battlefield mortality and a significant cause of domestic civilian mortality. Rapid hemorrhage control is crucial for survival. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze are commercially available products marketed for rapid hemorrhage control. These products were selected because they are packable gauze that work via differing mechanisms of action (tissue adhesion versus procoagulant). Objective. To compare the effectiveness of ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze in controlling arterial hemorrhage in a swine model. Methods. Fourteen swine were studied. Following inguinal dissection and after achieving minimum hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≥70 mmHg), a femoral arterial injury was created using a 6-mm vascular punch. Free bleeding was allowed for 45 seconds, and then the wound was packed alternatively with ChitoGauze or Combat Gauze. Direct pressure was applied to the wound for 2 minutes, followed by a three-hour monitoring period. Resuscitation fluids were administered to maintain an MAP of ≥65 mmHg. Time to hemostasis, hemodynamic parameters, total blood loss, and amount of resuscitation fluid were recorded every 15 minutes. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Histologic sections of the vessels were examined using regular and polarized light. Results. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding any measured end point. Data trends, however, favor ChitoGauze over Combat Gauze for time to hemostasis, fluid requirements, and blood loss. There was no evidence of retained foreign material on histologic analysis. Conclusion. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze appear to be equally efficacious in their hemostatic properties, as demonstrated in a porcine hemorrhage model.",
keywords = "ChitoGauze, Combat Gauze, Combat medicine, Gunshot wound, Hemorrhage, Hemostatic agent",
author = "Schwartz, {Richard B} and Reynolds, {Bradford Zahner} and Shiver, {Stephen A} and Lerner, {E. Brooke} and Greenfield, {Eric Mark} and Solis, {Ricaurte A.} and Kimpel, {Nicholas A.} and Coule, {Phillip L} and McManus, {John G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/10903127.2011.598615",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "477--482",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two packable hemostatic gauze dressings in a porcine hemorrhage model

AU - Schwartz, Richard B

AU - Reynolds, Bradford Zahner

AU - Shiver, Stephen A

AU - Lerner, E. Brooke

AU - Greenfield, Eric Mark

AU - Solis, Ricaurte A.

AU - Kimpel, Nicholas A.

AU - Coule, Phillip L

AU - McManus, John G.

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Background. Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains the primary cause of preventable battlefield mortality and a significant cause of domestic civilian mortality. Rapid hemorrhage control is crucial for survival. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze are commercially available products marketed for rapid hemorrhage control. These products were selected because they are packable gauze that work via differing mechanisms of action (tissue adhesion versus procoagulant). Objective. To compare the effectiveness of ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze in controlling arterial hemorrhage in a swine model. Methods. Fourteen swine were studied. Following inguinal dissection and after achieving minimum hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≥70 mmHg), a femoral arterial injury was created using a 6-mm vascular punch. Free bleeding was allowed for 45 seconds, and then the wound was packed alternatively with ChitoGauze or Combat Gauze. Direct pressure was applied to the wound for 2 minutes, followed by a three-hour monitoring period. Resuscitation fluids were administered to maintain an MAP of ≥65 mmHg. Time to hemostasis, hemodynamic parameters, total blood loss, and amount of resuscitation fluid were recorded every 15 minutes. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Histologic sections of the vessels were examined using regular and polarized light. Results. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding any measured end point. Data trends, however, favor ChitoGauze over Combat Gauze for time to hemostasis, fluid requirements, and blood loss. There was no evidence of retained foreign material on histologic analysis. Conclusion. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze appear to be equally efficacious in their hemostatic properties, as demonstrated in a porcine hemorrhage model.

AB - Background. Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains the primary cause of preventable battlefield mortality and a significant cause of domestic civilian mortality. Rapid hemorrhage control is crucial for survival. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze are commercially available products marketed for rapid hemorrhage control. These products were selected because they are packable gauze that work via differing mechanisms of action (tissue adhesion versus procoagulant). Objective. To compare the effectiveness of ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze in controlling arterial hemorrhage in a swine model. Methods. Fourteen swine were studied. Following inguinal dissection and after achieving minimum hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≥70 mmHg), a femoral arterial injury was created using a 6-mm vascular punch. Free bleeding was allowed for 45 seconds, and then the wound was packed alternatively with ChitoGauze or Combat Gauze. Direct pressure was applied to the wound for 2 minutes, followed by a three-hour monitoring period. Resuscitation fluids were administered to maintain an MAP of ≥65 mmHg. Time to hemostasis, hemodynamic parameters, total blood loss, and amount of resuscitation fluid were recorded every 15 minutes. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Histologic sections of the vessels were examined using regular and polarized light. Results. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding any measured end point. Data trends, however, favor ChitoGauze over Combat Gauze for time to hemostasis, fluid requirements, and blood loss. There was no evidence of retained foreign material on histologic analysis. Conclusion. ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze appear to be equally efficacious in their hemostatic properties, as demonstrated in a porcine hemorrhage model.

KW - ChitoGauze

KW - Combat Gauze

KW - Combat medicine

KW - Gunshot wound

KW - Hemorrhage

KW - Hemostatic agent

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052294682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052294682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/10903127.2011.598615

DO - 10.3109/10903127.2011.598615

M3 - Article

C2 - 21870945

AN - SCOPUS:80052294682

VL - 15

SP - 477

EP - 482

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 4

ER -