Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition

Federica Papacchini, Susanna Dall'Oca, Nicoletta Chieffi, Cecilia Goracci, Fernanda Tranchesi Sadek, Byoung I. Suh, Franklin Chi Meng Tay, Marco Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the 24-h microtensile bond strength of a microfilled hybrid composite to the same material after mechanical and/or chemical treatment and assess the effect of oxygen inhibition on the composite-composite bond. Materials and Methods: Forty composite cylinders of Gradia Direct Anterior (GC) were prepared and stored 24 h prior to the following surface treatments: 50-μm aluminum oxide air abrasion and 37% phosphoric acid etching (group 1); hydrochloric acid and 6.9% hydrofluoric acid etching (group 2); diamond bur roughening and 37% phosphoric acid etching (group 3); diamond bur roughening (group 4). In all groups, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply De Trey) was applied and light cured in air or under a nitrogen atmosphere, prior to layering a buildup of the repairing resin composite. Microtensile bond strength measurements were performed. Data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: The curing atmosphere did not significantly influence the interfacial strength (p < 0.05). Surface treatment significantly affected the composite-composite bond (p > 0.05). Air abrasion, regardless of curing atmosphere, resulted in the strongest bond (p < 0.05). The other treatments were comparable. Conclusion: Air abrasion and the application of a bonding agent offer satisfactory bond strengths for composite repair. The oxygen inhibition layer on a light-cured adhesive is not crucial to the success of the 24-h composite-composite bond.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-31
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume9
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 21 2007

Fingerprint

Atmosphere
Air
Oxygen
Diamond
Hydrofluoric Acid
Light
Hydrochloric Acid
Aluminum Oxide
Composite Resins
Adhesives
Analysis of Variance
Nitrogen
phosphoric acid

Keywords

  • Composite repair
  • Microtensile bond strength
  • Oxygen-inhibited layer
  • Surface treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

Papacchini, F., Dall'Oca, S., Chieffi, N., Goracci, C., Sadek, F. T., Suh, B. I., ... Ferrari, M. (2007). Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 9(1), 25-31.

Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin : Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. / Papacchini, Federica; Dall'Oca, Susanna; Chieffi, Nicoletta; Goracci, Cecilia; Sadek, Fernanda Tranchesi; Suh, Byoung I.; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng; Ferrari, Marco.

In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Vol. 9, No. 1, 21.03.2007, p. 25-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Papacchini, Federica ; Dall'Oca, Susanna ; Chieffi, Nicoletta ; Goracci, Cecilia ; Sadek, Fernanda Tranchesi ; Suh, Byoung I. ; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng ; Ferrari, Marco. / Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin : Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 25-31.
@article{3fab195d0a3b417882e53cecfa828a52,
title = "Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the 24-h microtensile bond strength of a microfilled hybrid composite to the same material after mechanical and/or chemical treatment and assess the effect of oxygen inhibition on the composite-composite bond. Materials and Methods: Forty composite cylinders of Gradia Direct Anterior (GC) were prepared and stored 24 h prior to the following surface treatments: 50-μm aluminum oxide air abrasion and 37{\%} phosphoric acid etching (group 1); hydrochloric acid and 6.9{\%} hydrofluoric acid etching (group 2); diamond bur roughening and 37{\%} phosphoric acid etching (group 3); diamond bur roughening (group 4). In all groups, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply De Trey) was applied and light cured in air or under a nitrogen atmosphere, prior to layering a buildup of the repairing resin composite. Microtensile bond strength measurements were performed. Data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: The curing atmosphere did not significantly influence the interfacial strength (p < 0.05). Surface treatment significantly affected the composite-composite bond (p > 0.05). Air abrasion, regardless of curing atmosphere, resulted in the strongest bond (p < 0.05). The other treatments were comparable. Conclusion: Air abrasion and the application of a bonding agent offer satisfactory bond strengths for composite repair. The oxygen inhibition layer on a light-cured adhesive is not crucial to the success of the 24-h composite-composite bond.",
keywords = "Composite repair, Microtensile bond strength, Oxygen-inhibited layer, Surface treatment",
author = "Federica Papacchini and Susanna Dall'Oca and Nicoletta Chieffi and Cecilia Goracci and Sadek, {Fernanda Tranchesi} and Suh, {Byoung I.} and Tay, {Franklin Chi Meng} and Marco Ferrari",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "21",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "25--31",
journal = "The journal of adhesive dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin

T2 - Effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition

AU - Papacchini, Federica

AU - Dall'Oca, Susanna

AU - Chieffi, Nicoletta

AU - Goracci, Cecilia

AU - Sadek, Fernanda Tranchesi

AU - Suh, Byoung I.

AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng

AU - Ferrari, Marco

PY - 2007/3/21

Y1 - 2007/3/21

N2 - Purpose: To compare the 24-h microtensile bond strength of a microfilled hybrid composite to the same material after mechanical and/or chemical treatment and assess the effect of oxygen inhibition on the composite-composite bond. Materials and Methods: Forty composite cylinders of Gradia Direct Anterior (GC) were prepared and stored 24 h prior to the following surface treatments: 50-μm aluminum oxide air abrasion and 37% phosphoric acid etching (group 1); hydrochloric acid and 6.9% hydrofluoric acid etching (group 2); diamond bur roughening and 37% phosphoric acid etching (group 3); diamond bur roughening (group 4). In all groups, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply De Trey) was applied and light cured in air or under a nitrogen atmosphere, prior to layering a buildup of the repairing resin composite. Microtensile bond strength measurements were performed. Data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: The curing atmosphere did not significantly influence the interfacial strength (p < 0.05). Surface treatment significantly affected the composite-composite bond (p > 0.05). Air abrasion, regardless of curing atmosphere, resulted in the strongest bond (p < 0.05). The other treatments were comparable. Conclusion: Air abrasion and the application of a bonding agent offer satisfactory bond strengths for composite repair. The oxygen inhibition layer on a light-cured adhesive is not crucial to the success of the 24-h composite-composite bond.

AB - Purpose: To compare the 24-h microtensile bond strength of a microfilled hybrid composite to the same material after mechanical and/or chemical treatment and assess the effect of oxygen inhibition on the composite-composite bond. Materials and Methods: Forty composite cylinders of Gradia Direct Anterior (GC) were prepared and stored 24 h prior to the following surface treatments: 50-μm aluminum oxide air abrasion and 37% phosphoric acid etching (group 1); hydrochloric acid and 6.9% hydrofluoric acid etching (group 2); diamond bur roughening and 37% phosphoric acid etching (group 3); diamond bur roughening (group 4). In all groups, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply De Trey) was applied and light cured in air or under a nitrogen atmosphere, prior to layering a buildup of the repairing resin composite. Microtensile bond strength measurements were performed. Data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: The curing atmosphere did not significantly influence the interfacial strength (p < 0.05). Surface treatment significantly affected the composite-composite bond (p > 0.05). Air abrasion, regardless of curing atmosphere, resulted in the strongest bond (p < 0.05). The other treatments were comparable. Conclusion: Air abrasion and the application of a bonding agent offer satisfactory bond strengths for composite repair. The oxygen inhibition layer on a light-cured adhesive is not crucial to the success of the 24-h composite-composite bond.

KW - Composite repair

KW - Microtensile bond strength

KW - Oxygen-inhibited layer

KW - Surface treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947269090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947269090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17432398

AN - SCOPUS:33947269090

VL - 9

SP - 25

EP - 31

JO - The journal of adhesive dentistry

JF - The journal of adhesive dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 1

ER -