Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings

John R. Searle, Lawrence D Devoe, Mary C. Phillips, Nancy S. Searle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous attempts to computerize the analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) using mainframe or minicomputers were not accepted in routine clinical practice because of their complexity, cost, and lack of validation. We describe the first practical, inexpensive system integrated into a clinical protocol that analyzes and documents FHR baseline, long-term variability, and episodic events using a standard microcomputer. A comparison of computerized and manual analyses of 284 nonstress tests (NSTs) of high-risk patients revealed no significant differences in determining the number of acceleration and deceleration events and mean FHR baseline. Long-term variability and other reported data could not be compared for lack of manual techniques. The combination of standardized analysis and quantified data may improve the predictive value of the computerized NST compared with the visually analyzed NST. Other benefits include computerized archiving, data transmission by telephone, and linkage to a perinatal data base. (C) 1988 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-412
Number of pages6
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume71
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Fetal Heart Rate
Minicomputers
Deceleration
Microcomputers
Clinical Protocols
Telephone
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Searle, J. R., Devoe, L. D., Phillips, M. C., & Searle, N. S. (1988). Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 71(3), 407-412.

Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings. / Searle, John R.; Devoe, Lawrence D; Phillips, Mary C.; Searle, Nancy S.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 71, No. 3, 01.01.1988, p. 407-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Searle, JR, Devoe, LD, Phillips, MC & Searle, NS 1988, 'Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings', Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 407-412.
Searle JR, Devoe LD, Phillips MC, Searle NS. Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1988 Jan 1;71(3):407-412.
Searle, John R. ; Devoe, Lawrence D ; Phillips, Mary C. ; Searle, Nancy S. / Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1988 ; Vol. 71, No. 3. pp. 407-412.
@article{9c39fc4869594f63a58878f07ac5c968,
title = "Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings",
abstract = "Previous attempts to computerize the analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) using mainframe or minicomputers were not accepted in routine clinical practice because of their complexity, cost, and lack of validation. We describe the first practical, inexpensive system integrated into a clinical protocol that analyzes and documents FHR baseline, long-term variability, and episodic events using a standard microcomputer. A comparison of computerized and manual analyses of 284 nonstress tests (NSTs) of high-risk patients revealed no significant differences in determining the number of acceleration and deceleration events and mean FHR baseline. Long-term variability and other reported data could not be compared for lack of manual techniques. The combination of standardized analysis and quantified data may improve the predictive value of the computerized NST compared with the visually analyzed NST. Other benefits include computerized archiving, data transmission by telephone, and linkage to a perinatal data base. (C) 1988 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.",
author = "Searle, {John R.} and Devoe, {Lawrence D} and Phillips, {Mary C.} and Searle, {Nancy S.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "407--412",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings

AU - Searle, John R.

AU - Devoe, Lawrence D

AU - Phillips, Mary C.

AU - Searle, Nancy S.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Previous attempts to computerize the analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) using mainframe or minicomputers were not accepted in routine clinical practice because of their complexity, cost, and lack of validation. We describe the first practical, inexpensive system integrated into a clinical protocol that analyzes and documents FHR baseline, long-term variability, and episodic events using a standard microcomputer. A comparison of computerized and manual analyses of 284 nonstress tests (NSTs) of high-risk patients revealed no significant differences in determining the number of acceleration and deceleration events and mean FHR baseline. Long-term variability and other reported data could not be compared for lack of manual techniques. The combination of standardized analysis and quantified data may improve the predictive value of the computerized NST compared with the visually analyzed NST. Other benefits include computerized archiving, data transmission by telephone, and linkage to a perinatal data base. (C) 1988 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

AB - Previous attempts to computerize the analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) using mainframe or minicomputers were not accepted in routine clinical practice because of their complexity, cost, and lack of validation. We describe the first practical, inexpensive system integrated into a clinical protocol that analyzes and documents FHR baseline, long-term variability, and episodic events using a standard microcomputer. A comparison of computerized and manual analyses of 284 nonstress tests (NSTs) of high-risk patients revealed no significant differences in determining the number of acceleration and deceleration events and mean FHR baseline. Long-term variability and other reported data could not be compared for lack of manual techniques. The combination of standardized analysis and quantified data may improve the predictive value of the computerized NST compared with the visually analyzed NST. Other benefits include computerized archiving, data transmission by telephone, and linkage to a perinatal data base. (C) 1988 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023696160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023696160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3279353

AN - SCOPUS:0023696160

VL - 71

SP - 407

EP - 412

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 3

ER -