Contextual effects of binocular depth cues and shadow-based depth cues on motion interpretation

Jay Hegde, Thomas D. Albright, Gene R. Stoner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A horizontally moving grating viewed through a diamond-shaped aperture appears to move either upwards or downwards if binocular depth cues (disparity and monocular half-occlusions) are used to simulate partial occlusion of that grating (Duncan, Albright and Stoner, 2000, J Neurosci 20:5885). For these 'barber diamond' stimuli, the grating is perceived to move towards (and slide under) the occluding panels. We asked whether depth from shadows is as effective as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction. We created barber diamond movies in which the depth order of the surrounding panels was based on either binocular cues or shadows. In movies with shadows, all image features had zero disparity. Subjects (n=11) viewed all movies through anaglyph glasses and reported the perceived direction of the gratings by adjusting the orientation of a bar. Reports in the direction of near panels significantly outnumbered those in the direction of the far panels (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05) for all subjects for both shadowed and binocularly cued movies. The directional bias for the two types of depth cues was indistinguishable for each subject (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05 in all cases). These results indicate that shadows can be at least as powerful as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction of motion. Since directional responses of area MT neurons have been shown to reflect the perceived direction for barber diamond stimuli with binocular depth cues, this raises the question of whether the effect of shadows is also present in that cortical area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume3
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues
Diamond
Motion Pictures
Glass
Direction compound
Neurons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Contextual effects of binocular depth cues and shadow-based depth cues on motion interpretation. / Hegde, Jay; Albright, Thomas D.; Stoner, Gene R.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 3, No. 9, 01.12.2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8384f8871540423ebb5abd483d01ea93,
title = "Contextual effects of binocular depth cues and shadow-based depth cues on motion interpretation",
abstract = "A horizontally moving grating viewed through a diamond-shaped aperture appears to move either upwards or downwards if binocular depth cues (disparity and monocular half-occlusions) are used to simulate partial occlusion of that grating (Duncan, Albright and Stoner, 2000, J Neurosci 20:5885). For these 'barber diamond' stimuli, the grating is perceived to move towards (and slide under) the occluding panels. We asked whether depth from shadows is as effective as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction. We created barber diamond movies in which the depth order of the surrounding panels was based on either binocular cues or shadows. In movies with shadows, all image features had zero disparity. Subjects (n=11) viewed all movies through anaglyph glasses and reported the perceived direction of the gratings by adjusting the orientation of a bar. Reports in the direction of near panels significantly outnumbered those in the direction of the far panels (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05) for all subjects for both shadowed and binocularly cued movies. The directional bias for the two types of depth cues was indistinguishable for each subject (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05 in all cases). These results indicate that shadows can be at least as powerful as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction of motion. Since directional responses of area MT neurons have been shown to reflect the perceived direction for barber diamond stimuli with binocular depth cues, this raises the question of whether the effect of shadows is also present in that cortical area.",
author = "Jay Hegde and Albright, {Thomas D.} and Stoner, {Gene R.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/3.9.804",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextual effects of binocular depth cues and shadow-based depth cues on motion interpretation

AU - Hegde, Jay

AU - Albright, Thomas D.

AU - Stoner, Gene R.

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - A horizontally moving grating viewed through a diamond-shaped aperture appears to move either upwards or downwards if binocular depth cues (disparity and monocular half-occlusions) are used to simulate partial occlusion of that grating (Duncan, Albright and Stoner, 2000, J Neurosci 20:5885). For these 'barber diamond' stimuli, the grating is perceived to move towards (and slide under) the occluding panels. We asked whether depth from shadows is as effective as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction. We created barber diamond movies in which the depth order of the surrounding panels was based on either binocular cues or shadows. In movies with shadows, all image features had zero disparity. Subjects (n=11) viewed all movies through anaglyph glasses and reported the perceived direction of the gratings by adjusting the orientation of a bar. Reports in the direction of near panels significantly outnumbered those in the direction of the far panels (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05) for all subjects for both shadowed and binocularly cued movies. The directional bias for the two types of depth cues was indistinguishable for each subject (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05 in all cases). These results indicate that shadows can be at least as powerful as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction of motion. Since directional responses of area MT neurons have been shown to reflect the perceived direction for barber diamond stimuli with binocular depth cues, this raises the question of whether the effect of shadows is also present in that cortical area.

AB - A horizontally moving grating viewed through a diamond-shaped aperture appears to move either upwards or downwards if binocular depth cues (disparity and monocular half-occlusions) are used to simulate partial occlusion of that grating (Duncan, Albright and Stoner, 2000, J Neurosci 20:5885). For these 'barber diamond' stimuli, the grating is perceived to move towards (and slide under) the occluding panels. We asked whether depth from shadows is as effective as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction. We created barber diamond movies in which the depth order of the surrounding panels was based on either binocular cues or shadows. In movies with shadows, all image features had zero disparity. Subjects (n=11) viewed all movies through anaglyph glasses and reported the perceived direction of the gratings by adjusting the orientation of a bar. Reports in the direction of near panels significantly outnumbered those in the direction of the far panels (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05) for all subjects for both shadowed and binocularly cued movies. The directional bias for the two types of depth cues was indistinguishable for each subject (binomial proportions test, p < 0.05 in all cases). These results indicate that shadows can be at least as powerful as binocular cues in biasing perceived direction of motion. Since directional responses of area MT neurons have been shown to reflect the perceived direction for barber diamond stimuli with binocular depth cues, this raises the question of whether the effect of shadows is also present in that cortical area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243091745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243091745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/3.9.804

DO - 10.1167/3.9.804

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 9

ER -