Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role

Kimberly Ephgrave, Katherine L. Margo, Christopher White, Maya Hammoud, Amy Brodkey, Thomas Painter, Vern C. Juel, Darlene Shaw, Kristi Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a national multidisciplinary investigation assessing core clinical clerkships and their directors, variances in resources from national guidelines, and the impact of the clerkship director role on faculty members' academic productivity, advancement, and satisfaction. Method: A multidisciplinary working group of the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE), representing all seven core clinical disciplines, created and distributed a survey to clerkship directors at 125 U.S. MD-granting medical schools, in academic year 2006-2007. Results: A total of 544 clerkship directors from Internal Medicine (96), Family Medicine (91), Psychiatry, (91), Pediatrics (79), Surgery (71), Neurology (60), and Obstetrics-Gynecology (56) responded, representing over 60% of U.S. core clinical clerkships. The clerkship directors were similar across disciplines in demographics and academic productivity, though clinical and clerkship activities varied. Departmental staff support for clerkships averaged 0.69 people, distinctly less than the ACE's 2003 guideline of a full-time coordinator in all disciplines' clerkships. Clerkship directors reported heavy clinical responsibilities, which, as in previous studies, were negatively related to academic productivity. However, many clerkship directors felt the role enhanced their academic advancement; a large majority felt it significantly enhanced their career satisfaction. Conclusions: The resources and rewards of the clerkship director role were similar across disciplines. Expectations of clerkship directors were considerable, including responsibility for clinical material and the learning environment. Resources for many fall short of those stated in the ACE guidelines, particularly regarding support staff. However, the findings indicate that the clerkship director role can have benefits for academic advancement and strongly enhances career satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)710-715
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Ephgrave, K., Margo, K. L., White, C., Hammoud, M., Brodkey, A., Painter, T., Juel, V. C., Shaw, D., & Ferguson, K. (2010). Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role. Academic Medicine, 85(4), 710-715. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2cdf1