Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role

Kimberly Ephgrave, Katherine L. Margo, Christopher Bradford White, Maya Hammoud, Amy Brodkey, Thomas Painter, Vern C. Juel, Darlene Shaw, Kristi Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a national multidisciplinary investigation assessing core clinical clerkships and their directors, variances in resources from national guidelines, and the impact of the clerkship director role on faculty members' academic productivity, advancement, and satisfaction. Method: A multidisciplinary working group of the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE), representing all seven core clinical disciplines, created and distributed a survey to clerkship directors at 125 U.S. MD-granting medical schools, in academic year 2006-2007. Results: A total of 544 clerkship directors from Internal Medicine (96), Family Medicine (91), Psychiatry, (91), Pediatrics (79), Surgery (71), Neurology (60), and Obstetrics-Gynecology (56) responded, representing over 60% of U.S. core clinical clerkships. The clerkship directors were similar across disciplines in demographics and academic productivity, though clinical and clerkship activities varied. Departmental staff support for clerkships averaged 0.69 people, distinctly less than the ACE's 2003 guideline of a full-time coordinator in all disciplines' clerkships. Clerkship directors reported heavy clinical responsibilities, which, as in previous studies, were negatively related to academic productivity. However, many clerkship directors felt the role enhanced their academic advancement; a large majority felt it significantly enhanced their career satisfaction. Conclusions: The resources and rewards of the clerkship director role were similar across disciplines. Expectations of clerkship directors were considerable, including responsibility for clinical material and the learning environment. Resources for many fall short of those stated in the ACE guidelines, particularly regarding support staff. However, the findings indicate that the clerkship director role can have benefits for academic advancement and strongly enhances career satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)710-715
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Clinical Clerkship
Reward
reward
director
Guidelines
Efficiency
resources
Education
Neurology
Internal Medicine
Medical Schools
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Psychiatry
Medicine
Demography
Learning
Pediatrics
productivity
career

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Ephgrave, K., Margo, K. L., White, C. B., Hammoud, M., Brodkey, A., Painter, T., ... Ferguson, K. (2010). Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role. Academic Medicine, 85(4), 710-715. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2cdf1

Core clerkship directors : Their current resources and the rewards of the role. / Ephgrave, Kimberly; Margo, Katherine L.; White, Christopher Bradford; Hammoud, Maya; Brodkey, Amy; Painter, Thomas; Juel, Vern C.; Shaw, Darlene; Ferguson, Kristi.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 4, 01.01.2010, p. 710-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ephgrave, K, Margo, KL, White, CB, Hammoud, M, Brodkey, A, Painter, T, Juel, VC, Shaw, D & Ferguson, K 2010, 'Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role', Academic Medicine, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 710-715. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2cdf1
Ephgrave K, Margo KL, White CB, Hammoud M, Brodkey A, Painter T et al. Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role. Academic Medicine. 2010 Jan 1;85(4):710-715. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2cdf1
Ephgrave, Kimberly ; Margo, Katherine L. ; White, Christopher Bradford ; Hammoud, Maya ; Brodkey, Amy ; Painter, Thomas ; Juel, Vern C. ; Shaw, Darlene ; Ferguson, Kristi. / Core clerkship directors : Their current resources and the rewards of the role. In: Academic Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 4. pp. 710-715.
@article{9fd164e6d2be40369a485137c9ebf8e4,
title = "Core clerkship directors: Their current resources and the rewards of the role",
abstract = "Purpose: To conduct a national multidisciplinary investigation assessing core clinical clerkships and their directors, variances in resources from national guidelines, and the impact of the clerkship director role on faculty members' academic productivity, advancement, and satisfaction. Method: A multidisciplinary working group of the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE), representing all seven core clinical disciplines, created and distributed a survey to clerkship directors at 125 U.S. MD-granting medical schools, in academic year 2006-2007. Results: A total of 544 clerkship directors from Internal Medicine (96), Family Medicine (91), Psychiatry, (91), Pediatrics (79), Surgery (71), Neurology (60), and Obstetrics-Gynecology (56) responded, representing over 60{\%} of U.S. core clinical clerkships. The clerkship directors were similar across disciplines in demographics and academic productivity, though clinical and clerkship activities varied. Departmental staff support for clerkships averaged 0.69 people, distinctly less than the ACE's 2003 guideline of a full-time coordinator in all disciplines' clerkships. Clerkship directors reported heavy clinical responsibilities, which, as in previous studies, were negatively related to academic productivity. However, many clerkship directors felt the role enhanced their academic advancement; a large majority felt it significantly enhanced their career satisfaction. Conclusions: The resources and rewards of the clerkship director role were similar across disciplines. Expectations of clerkship directors were considerable, including responsibility for clinical material and the learning environment. Resources for many fall short of those stated in the ACE guidelines, particularly regarding support staff. However, the findings indicate that the clerkship director role can have benefits for academic advancement and strongly enhances career satisfaction.",
author = "Kimberly Ephgrave and Margo, {Katherine L.} and White, {Christopher Bradford} and Maya Hammoud and Amy Brodkey and Thomas Painter and Juel, {Vern C.} and Darlene Shaw and Kristi Ferguson",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2cdf1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "710--715",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Core clerkship directors

T2 - Their current resources and the rewards of the role

AU - Ephgrave, Kimberly

AU - Margo, Katherine L.

AU - White, Christopher Bradford

AU - Hammoud, Maya

AU - Brodkey, Amy

AU - Painter, Thomas

AU - Juel, Vern C.

AU - Shaw, Darlene

AU - Ferguson, Kristi

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To conduct a national multidisciplinary investigation assessing core clinical clerkships and their directors, variances in resources from national guidelines, and the impact of the clerkship director role on faculty members' academic productivity, advancement, and satisfaction. Method: A multidisciplinary working group of the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE), representing all seven core clinical disciplines, created and distributed a survey to clerkship directors at 125 U.S. MD-granting medical schools, in academic year 2006-2007. Results: A total of 544 clerkship directors from Internal Medicine (96), Family Medicine (91), Psychiatry, (91), Pediatrics (79), Surgery (71), Neurology (60), and Obstetrics-Gynecology (56) responded, representing over 60% of U.S. core clinical clerkships. The clerkship directors were similar across disciplines in demographics and academic productivity, though clinical and clerkship activities varied. Departmental staff support for clerkships averaged 0.69 people, distinctly less than the ACE's 2003 guideline of a full-time coordinator in all disciplines' clerkships. Clerkship directors reported heavy clinical responsibilities, which, as in previous studies, were negatively related to academic productivity. However, many clerkship directors felt the role enhanced their academic advancement; a large majority felt it significantly enhanced their career satisfaction. Conclusions: The resources and rewards of the clerkship director role were similar across disciplines. Expectations of clerkship directors were considerable, including responsibility for clinical material and the learning environment. Resources for many fall short of those stated in the ACE guidelines, particularly regarding support staff. However, the findings indicate that the clerkship director role can have benefits for academic advancement and strongly enhances career satisfaction.

AB - Purpose: To conduct a national multidisciplinary investigation assessing core clinical clerkships and their directors, variances in resources from national guidelines, and the impact of the clerkship director role on faculty members' academic productivity, advancement, and satisfaction. Method: A multidisciplinary working group of the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE), representing all seven core clinical disciplines, created and distributed a survey to clerkship directors at 125 U.S. MD-granting medical schools, in academic year 2006-2007. Results: A total of 544 clerkship directors from Internal Medicine (96), Family Medicine (91), Psychiatry, (91), Pediatrics (79), Surgery (71), Neurology (60), and Obstetrics-Gynecology (56) responded, representing over 60% of U.S. core clinical clerkships. The clerkship directors were similar across disciplines in demographics and academic productivity, though clinical and clerkship activities varied. Departmental staff support for clerkships averaged 0.69 people, distinctly less than the ACE's 2003 guideline of a full-time coordinator in all disciplines' clerkships. Clerkship directors reported heavy clinical responsibilities, which, as in previous studies, were negatively related to academic productivity. However, many clerkship directors felt the role enhanced their academic advancement; a large majority felt it significantly enhanced their career satisfaction. Conclusions: The resources and rewards of the clerkship director role were similar across disciplines. Expectations of clerkship directors were considerable, including responsibility for clinical material and the learning environment. Resources for many fall short of those stated in the ACE guidelines, particularly regarding support staff. However, the findings indicate that the clerkship director role can have benefits for academic advancement and strongly enhances career satisfaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951677129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951677129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2cdf1

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2cdf1

M3 - Article

C2 - 20354393

AN - SCOPUS:77951677129

VL - 85

SP - 710

EP - 715

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 4

ER -