Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives

Jeffrey A Switzer, Bart M. Demaerschalk, Jipan Xie, Liangyi Fan, Kathleen F. Villa, Eric Q. Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-A hub-and-spoke telestroke network is an effective way to extend quality acute stroke care to remote hospitals and to improve patient outcomes. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a telestroke network in the management of acute ischemic stroke from the perspectives of a network, a hub hospital, and a spoke hospital. Methods and Results-A model was developed to compare costs and effectiveness with and without a telestroke network over a 5-year time horizon. The model considered differences in rates of teleconsultations, intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke therapies, and spoke-to-hub transfers. These inputs were estimated through the use of data from Georgia Health Sciences University and Mayo Clinic telestroke networks. A network model with 1 hub and 7 spokes predicted that 45 more patients would be treated with intravenous thrombolysis and 20 more with endovascular stroke therapies per year compared with no network, leading to an estimate of 6.11 more home discharges. Each year, a telestroke network was associated with 358 435 in cost savings; each spoke had 109 080 in cost savings, whereas the hub had positive costs of 405 121. However, cost sharing can be arranged so that each hospital could achieve an equal amount of cost savings (44 804/y). Results were sensitive to the number of spokes, marginal treatment costs in spokes and rates of transfer, and endovascular stroke therapies. Conclusions-The results of this study suggest that a telestroke network may increase the number of patients discharged home and reduce the costs borne by the network hospitals. Hospitals should consider their available resources and the network features when deciding whether to join or set up a network.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-26
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Stroke
Cost Savings
Remote Consultation
Cost Sharing
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Care Costs
Therapeutics
Health

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Stroke
  • Telemedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives. / Switzer, Jeffrey A; Demaerschalk, Bart M.; Xie, Jipan; Fan, Liangyi; Villa, Kathleen F.; Wu, Eric Q.

In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 18-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{5c9f353096814f7290ec3abea986698b,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives",
abstract = "Background-A hub-and-spoke telestroke network is an effective way to extend quality acute stroke care to remote hospitals and to improve patient outcomes. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a telestroke network in the management of acute ischemic stroke from the perspectives of a network, a hub hospital, and a spoke hospital. Methods and Results-A model was developed to compare costs and effectiveness with and without a telestroke network over a 5-year time horizon. The model considered differences in rates of teleconsultations, intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke therapies, and spoke-to-hub transfers. These inputs were estimated through the use of data from Georgia Health Sciences University and Mayo Clinic telestroke networks. A network model with 1 hub and 7 spokes predicted that 45 more patients would be treated with intravenous thrombolysis and 20 more with endovascular stroke therapies per year compared with no network, leading to an estimate of 6.11 more home discharges. Each year, a telestroke network was associated with 358 435 in cost savings; each spoke had 109 080 in cost savings, whereas the hub had positive costs of 405 121. However, cost sharing can be arranged so that each hospital could achieve an equal amount of cost savings (44 804/y). Results were sensitive to the number of spokes, marginal treatment costs in spokes and rates of transfer, and endovascular stroke therapies. Conclusions-The results of this study suggest that a telestroke network may increase the number of patients discharged home and reduce the costs borne by the network hospitals. Hospitals should consider their available resources and the network features when deciding whether to join or set up a network.",
keywords = "Cost-benefit analysis, Stroke, Telemedicine",
author = "Switzer, {Jeffrey A} and Demaerschalk, {Bart M.} and Jipan Xie and Liangyi Fan and Villa, {Kathleen F.} and Wu, {Eric Q.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967125",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "18--26",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes",
issn = "1941-7713",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives

AU - Switzer, Jeffrey A

AU - Demaerschalk, Bart M.

AU - Xie, Jipan

AU - Fan, Liangyi

AU - Villa, Kathleen F.

AU - Wu, Eric Q.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Background-A hub-and-spoke telestroke network is an effective way to extend quality acute stroke care to remote hospitals and to improve patient outcomes. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a telestroke network in the management of acute ischemic stroke from the perspectives of a network, a hub hospital, and a spoke hospital. Methods and Results-A model was developed to compare costs and effectiveness with and without a telestroke network over a 5-year time horizon. The model considered differences in rates of teleconsultations, intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke therapies, and spoke-to-hub transfers. These inputs were estimated through the use of data from Georgia Health Sciences University and Mayo Clinic telestroke networks. A network model with 1 hub and 7 spokes predicted that 45 more patients would be treated with intravenous thrombolysis and 20 more with endovascular stroke therapies per year compared with no network, leading to an estimate of 6.11 more home discharges. Each year, a telestroke network was associated with 358 435 in cost savings; each spoke had 109 080 in cost savings, whereas the hub had positive costs of 405 121. However, cost sharing can be arranged so that each hospital could achieve an equal amount of cost savings (44 804/y). Results were sensitive to the number of spokes, marginal treatment costs in spokes and rates of transfer, and endovascular stroke therapies. Conclusions-The results of this study suggest that a telestroke network may increase the number of patients discharged home and reduce the costs borne by the network hospitals. Hospitals should consider their available resources and the network features when deciding whether to join or set up a network.

AB - Background-A hub-and-spoke telestroke network is an effective way to extend quality acute stroke care to remote hospitals and to improve patient outcomes. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a telestroke network in the management of acute ischemic stroke from the perspectives of a network, a hub hospital, and a spoke hospital. Methods and Results-A model was developed to compare costs and effectiveness with and without a telestroke network over a 5-year time horizon. The model considered differences in rates of teleconsultations, intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke therapies, and spoke-to-hub transfers. These inputs were estimated through the use of data from Georgia Health Sciences University and Mayo Clinic telestroke networks. A network model with 1 hub and 7 spokes predicted that 45 more patients would be treated with intravenous thrombolysis and 20 more with endovascular stroke therapies per year compared with no network, leading to an estimate of 6.11 more home discharges. Each year, a telestroke network was associated with 358 435 in cost savings; each spoke had 109 080 in cost savings, whereas the hub had positive costs of 405 121. However, cost sharing can be arranged so that each hospital could achieve an equal amount of cost savings (44 804/y). Results were sensitive to the number of spokes, marginal treatment costs in spokes and rates of transfer, and endovascular stroke therapies. Conclusions-The results of this study suggest that a telestroke network may increase the number of patients discharged home and reduce the costs borne by the network hospitals. Hospitals should consider their available resources and the network features when deciding whether to join or set up a network.

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

KW - Stroke

KW - Telemedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873648546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873648546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967125

DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967125

M3 - Review article

VL - 6

SP - 18

EP - 26

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

SN - 1941-7713

IS - 1

ER -