Critical assessment of pediatric neurosurgery patient/parent educational information obtained via the Internet

Michael Garcia, Christopher Daugherty, Bertha Ben Khallouq, Todd Maugans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The Internet is used frequently by patients and family members to acquire information about pediatric neurosurgical conditions. The sources, nature, accuracy, and usefulness of this information have not been examined recently. The authors analyzed the results from searches of 10 common pediatric neurosurgical terms using a novel scoring test to assess the value of the educational information obtained. METHODS Google and Bing searches were performed for 10 common pediatric neurosurgical topics (concussion, craniosynostosis, hydrocephalus, pediatric brain tumor, pediatric Chiari malformation, pediatric epilepsy surgery, pediatric neurosurgery, plagiocephaly, spina bifda, and tethered spinal cord). The frst 10 "hits" obtained with each search engine were analyzed using the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test, which assigns a numerical score in each of 5 domains. Agreement between results was assessed for 1) concurrent searches with Google and Bing; 2) Google searches over time (6 months apart); 3) Google searches using mobile and PC platforms concurrently; and 4) searches using privacy settings. Readability was assessed with an online analytical tool. RESULTS Google and Bing searches yielded information with similar CRAAP scores (mean 72% and 75%, respectively), but with frequently differing results (58% concordance/matching results). There was a high level of agreement (72% concordance) over time for Google searches and also between searches using general and privacy settings (92% concordance). Government sources scored the best in both CRAAP score and readability. Hospitals and universities were the most prevalent sources, but these sources had the lowest CRAAP scores, due in part to an abundance of selfmarketing. The CRAAP scores for mobile and desktop platforms did not differ signifcantly (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS Google and Bing searches yielded useful educational information, using either mobile or PC platforms. Most information was relevant and accurate; however, the depth and breadth of information was variable. Search results over a 6-month period were moderately stable. Pediatric neurosurgery practices and neurosurgical professional organization websites were inferior (less current, less accurate, less authoritative, and less purposeful) to governmental and encyclopedia-type resources such as Wikipedia. This presents an opportunity for pediatric neurosurgeons to participate in the creation of better online patient/parent educational material.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)535-541
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2018

Fingerprint

Neurosurgery
Internet
Pediatrics
Privacy
Plagiocephaly
Encyclopedias
Search Engine
Craniosynostoses
Hydrocephalus
Brain Neoplasms
Epilepsy
Spinal Cord

Keywords

  • Educational information
  • Internet
  • Pediatric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Critical assessment of pediatric neurosurgery patient/parent educational information obtained via the Internet. / Garcia, Michael; Daugherty, Christopher; Khallouq, Bertha Ben; Maugans, Todd.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, Vol. 21, No. 5, 05.2018, p. 535-541.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Garcia, Michael ; Daugherty, Christopher ; Khallouq, Bertha Ben ; Maugans, Todd. / Critical assessment of pediatric neurosurgery patient/parent educational information obtained via the Internet. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 535-541.
@article{1b429cf2df7343d7834384b8beb145b3,
title = "Critical assessment of pediatric neurosurgery patient/parent educational information obtained via the Internet",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE The Internet is used frequently by patients and family members to acquire information about pediatric neurosurgical conditions. The sources, nature, accuracy, and usefulness of this information have not been examined recently. The authors analyzed the results from searches of 10 common pediatric neurosurgical terms using a novel scoring test to assess the value of the educational information obtained. METHODS Google and Bing searches were performed for 10 common pediatric neurosurgical topics (concussion, craniosynostosis, hydrocephalus, pediatric brain tumor, pediatric Chiari malformation, pediatric epilepsy surgery, pediatric neurosurgery, plagiocephaly, spina bifda, and tethered spinal cord). The frst 10 {"}hits{"} obtained with each search engine were analyzed using the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test, which assigns a numerical score in each of 5 domains. Agreement between results was assessed for 1) concurrent searches with Google and Bing; 2) Google searches over time (6 months apart); 3) Google searches using mobile and PC platforms concurrently; and 4) searches using privacy settings. Readability was assessed with an online analytical tool. RESULTS Google and Bing searches yielded information with similar CRAAP scores (mean 72{\%} and 75{\%}, respectively), but with frequently differing results (58{\%} concordance/matching results). There was a high level of agreement (72{\%} concordance) over time for Google searches and also between searches using general and privacy settings (92{\%} concordance). Government sources scored the best in both CRAAP score and readability. Hospitals and universities were the most prevalent sources, but these sources had the lowest CRAAP scores, due in part to an abundance of selfmarketing. The CRAAP scores for mobile and desktop platforms did not differ signifcantly (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS Google and Bing searches yielded useful educational information, using either mobile or PC platforms. Most information was relevant and accurate; however, the depth and breadth of information was variable. Search results over a 6-month period were moderately stable. Pediatric neurosurgery practices and neurosurgical professional organization websites were inferior (less current, less accurate, less authoritative, and less purposeful) to governmental and encyclopedia-type resources such as Wikipedia. This presents an opportunity for pediatric neurosurgeons to participate in the creation of better online patient/parent educational material.",
keywords = "Educational information, Internet, Pediatric",
author = "Michael Garcia and Christopher Daugherty and Khallouq, {Bertha Ben} and Todd Maugans",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3171/2017.10.PEDS17177",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "535--541",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics",
issn = "1933-0707",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical assessment of pediatric neurosurgery patient/parent educational information obtained via the Internet

AU - Garcia, Michael

AU - Daugherty, Christopher

AU - Khallouq, Bertha Ben

AU - Maugans, Todd

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE The Internet is used frequently by patients and family members to acquire information about pediatric neurosurgical conditions. The sources, nature, accuracy, and usefulness of this information have not been examined recently. The authors analyzed the results from searches of 10 common pediatric neurosurgical terms using a novel scoring test to assess the value of the educational information obtained. METHODS Google and Bing searches were performed for 10 common pediatric neurosurgical topics (concussion, craniosynostosis, hydrocephalus, pediatric brain tumor, pediatric Chiari malformation, pediatric epilepsy surgery, pediatric neurosurgery, plagiocephaly, spina bifda, and tethered spinal cord). The frst 10 "hits" obtained with each search engine were analyzed using the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test, which assigns a numerical score in each of 5 domains. Agreement between results was assessed for 1) concurrent searches with Google and Bing; 2) Google searches over time (6 months apart); 3) Google searches using mobile and PC platforms concurrently; and 4) searches using privacy settings. Readability was assessed with an online analytical tool. RESULTS Google and Bing searches yielded information with similar CRAAP scores (mean 72% and 75%, respectively), but with frequently differing results (58% concordance/matching results). There was a high level of agreement (72% concordance) over time for Google searches and also between searches using general and privacy settings (92% concordance). Government sources scored the best in both CRAAP score and readability. Hospitals and universities were the most prevalent sources, but these sources had the lowest CRAAP scores, due in part to an abundance of selfmarketing. The CRAAP scores for mobile and desktop platforms did not differ signifcantly (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS Google and Bing searches yielded useful educational information, using either mobile or PC platforms. Most information was relevant and accurate; however, the depth and breadth of information was variable. Search results over a 6-month period were moderately stable. Pediatric neurosurgery practices and neurosurgical professional organization websites were inferior (less current, less accurate, less authoritative, and less purposeful) to governmental and encyclopedia-type resources such as Wikipedia. This presents an opportunity for pediatric neurosurgeons to participate in the creation of better online patient/parent educational material.

AB - OBJECTIVE The Internet is used frequently by patients and family members to acquire information about pediatric neurosurgical conditions. The sources, nature, accuracy, and usefulness of this information have not been examined recently. The authors analyzed the results from searches of 10 common pediatric neurosurgical terms using a novel scoring test to assess the value of the educational information obtained. METHODS Google and Bing searches were performed for 10 common pediatric neurosurgical topics (concussion, craniosynostosis, hydrocephalus, pediatric brain tumor, pediatric Chiari malformation, pediatric epilepsy surgery, pediatric neurosurgery, plagiocephaly, spina bifda, and tethered spinal cord). The frst 10 "hits" obtained with each search engine were analyzed using the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test, which assigns a numerical score in each of 5 domains. Agreement between results was assessed for 1) concurrent searches with Google and Bing; 2) Google searches over time (6 months apart); 3) Google searches using mobile and PC platforms concurrently; and 4) searches using privacy settings. Readability was assessed with an online analytical tool. RESULTS Google and Bing searches yielded information with similar CRAAP scores (mean 72% and 75%, respectively), but with frequently differing results (58% concordance/matching results). There was a high level of agreement (72% concordance) over time for Google searches and also between searches using general and privacy settings (92% concordance). Government sources scored the best in both CRAAP score and readability. Hospitals and universities were the most prevalent sources, but these sources had the lowest CRAAP scores, due in part to an abundance of selfmarketing. The CRAAP scores for mobile and desktop platforms did not differ signifcantly (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS Google and Bing searches yielded useful educational information, using either mobile or PC platforms. Most information was relevant and accurate; however, the depth and breadth of information was variable. Search results over a 6-month period were moderately stable. Pediatric neurosurgery practices and neurosurgical professional organization websites were inferior (less current, less accurate, less authoritative, and less purposeful) to governmental and encyclopedia-type resources such as Wikipedia. This presents an opportunity for pediatric neurosurgeons to participate in the creation of better online patient/parent educational material.

KW - Educational information

KW - Internet

KW - Pediatric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048220530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048220530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2017.10.PEDS17177

DO - 10.3171/2017.10.PEDS17177

M3 - Article

C2 - 29451451

AN - SCOPUS:85048220530

VL - 21

SP - 535

EP - 541

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

SN - 1933-0707

IS - 5

ER -