Critical evaluation of emergency stockpile ventilators in an

Jason W. Custer, Christopher M Watson, Joe Dwyer, David W. Kaczka, Brett A. Simon, Blaine R. Easley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Modern health care systems may be inadequately prepared for mass casualty respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Current health policy has focused on the stockpiling of emergency ventilators, though little is known about the performance of these ventilators under conditions of respiratory failure in adults and children. In this study, we seek to compare emergency ventilator performance characteristics using a test lung simulating pediatric lung injury. Design: Evaluation of ventilator performance using a test lung. Setting: Laboratory. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Six transport/emergency ventilators capable of adult/child application were chosen on the basis of manufacturer specifications, Autovent 3000, Eagle Univent 754, EPV 100, LP-10, LTV 1200, and Parapac 200D. Manufacturer specifications for each ventilator were reviewed and compared with known standards for alarms and functionality for surge capacity ventilators. The delivered tidal volume, gas flow characteristics, and airway pressure waveforms were evaluated in vitro using a mechanical test lung to model pediatric lung injury and integrated software. Test lung and flow meter recordings were analyzed over a range of ventilator settings. Of the six ventilators assessed, only two had the minimum recommended alarm capability. Four of the six ventilators tested were capable of being set to deliver a tidal volume of less than 200 mL. The delivered tidal volume for all ventilators was within 8% of the nominal setting at a positive end expiratory pressure of zero but was reduced significantly with the addition of positive end expiratory pressure (range, ±10% to 30%; p <. 01). All ventilators tested performed comparably at higher set tidal volumes; however, only three of the ventilators tested delivered a tidal volume across the range of ventilator settings that was comparable to that of a standard intensive care unit ventilator. Conclusions: Multiple ventilators are available for the provision of ventilation to children with respiratory failure in a mass casualty scenario. Few of these ventilators possess the minimum alarm functionality and consistently deliver the prescribed tidal volume that allows for safe and effective ventilation of critically ill pediatric patients. These findings will help clinicians understand the performance and limitations of available ventilators intended for use in children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPediatric Critical Care Medicine
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mechanical Ventilators
Emergencies
Tidal Volume
Respiratory Insufficiency
Mass Casualty Incidents
Lung
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Lung Injury
Pediatrics
Ventilation
Surge Capacity
Eagles
Health Policy
Artificial Respiration
Critical Illness

Keywords

  • emergency preparedness
  • emergency ventilator
  • mass casualty respiratory failure
  • pediatric
  • stockpile

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Critical evaluation of emergency stockpile ventilators in an. / Custer, Jason W.; Watson, Christopher M; Dwyer, Joe; Kaczka, David W.; Simon, Brett A.; Easley, Blaine R.

In: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.01.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Custer, Jason W. ; Watson, Christopher M ; Dwyer, Joe ; Kaczka, David W. ; Simon, Brett A. ; Easley, Blaine R. / Critical evaluation of emergency stockpile ventilators in an. In: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 6.
@article{927a1cdfe7b14014b3a5815c5df64174,
title = "Critical evaluation of emergency stockpile ventilators in an",
abstract = "Objective: Modern health care systems may be inadequately prepared for mass casualty respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Current health policy has focused on the stockpiling of emergency ventilators, though little is known about the performance of these ventilators under conditions of respiratory failure in adults and children. In this study, we seek to compare emergency ventilator performance characteristics using a test lung simulating pediatric lung injury. Design: Evaluation of ventilator performance using a test lung. Setting: Laboratory. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Six transport/emergency ventilators capable of adult/child application were chosen on the basis of manufacturer specifications, Autovent 3000, Eagle Univent 754, EPV 100, LP-10, LTV 1200, and Parapac 200D. Manufacturer specifications for each ventilator were reviewed and compared with known standards for alarms and functionality for surge capacity ventilators. The delivered tidal volume, gas flow characteristics, and airway pressure waveforms were evaluated in vitro using a mechanical test lung to model pediatric lung injury and integrated software. Test lung and flow meter recordings were analyzed over a range of ventilator settings. Of the six ventilators assessed, only two had the minimum recommended alarm capability. Four of the six ventilators tested were capable of being set to deliver a tidal volume of less than 200 mL. The delivered tidal volume for all ventilators was within 8{\%} of the nominal setting at a positive end expiratory pressure of zero but was reduced significantly with the addition of positive end expiratory pressure (range, ±10{\%} to 30{\%}; p <. 01). All ventilators tested performed comparably at higher set tidal volumes; however, only three of the ventilators tested delivered a tidal volume across the range of ventilator settings that was comparable to that of a standard intensive care unit ventilator. Conclusions: Multiple ventilators are available for the provision of ventilation to children with respiratory failure in a mass casualty scenario. Few of these ventilators possess the minimum alarm functionality and consistently deliver the prescribed tidal volume that allows for safe and effective ventilation of critically ill pediatric patients. These findings will help clinicians understand the performance and limitations of available ventilators intended for use in children.",
keywords = "emergency preparedness, emergency ventilator, mass casualty respiratory failure, pediatric, stockpile",
author = "Custer, {Jason W.} and Watson, {Christopher M} and Joe Dwyer and Kaczka, {David W.} and Simon, {Brett A.} and Easley, {Blaine R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820ab891",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Pediatric Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1529-7535",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical evaluation of emergency stockpile ventilators in an

AU - Custer, Jason W.

AU - Watson, Christopher M

AU - Dwyer, Joe

AU - Kaczka, David W.

AU - Simon, Brett A.

AU - Easley, Blaine R.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Objective: Modern health care systems may be inadequately prepared for mass casualty respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Current health policy has focused on the stockpiling of emergency ventilators, though little is known about the performance of these ventilators under conditions of respiratory failure in adults and children. In this study, we seek to compare emergency ventilator performance characteristics using a test lung simulating pediatric lung injury. Design: Evaluation of ventilator performance using a test lung. Setting: Laboratory. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Six transport/emergency ventilators capable of adult/child application were chosen on the basis of manufacturer specifications, Autovent 3000, Eagle Univent 754, EPV 100, LP-10, LTV 1200, and Parapac 200D. Manufacturer specifications for each ventilator were reviewed and compared with known standards for alarms and functionality for surge capacity ventilators. The delivered tidal volume, gas flow characteristics, and airway pressure waveforms were evaluated in vitro using a mechanical test lung to model pediatric lung injury and integrated software. Test lung and flow meter recordings were analyzed over a range of ventilator settings. Of the six ventilators assessed, only two had the minimum recommended alarm capability. Four of the six ventilators tested were capable of being set to deliver a tidal volume of less than 200 mL. The delivered tidal volume for all ventilators was within 8% of the nominal setting at a positive end expiratory pressure of zero but was reduced significantly with the addition of positive end expiratory pressure (range, ±10% to 30%; p <. 01). All ventilators tested performed comparably at higher set tidal volumes; however, only three of the ventilators tested delivered a tidal volume across the range of ventilator settings that was comparable to that of a standard intensive care unit ventilator. Conclusions: Multiple ventilators are available for the provision of ventilation to children with respiratory failure in a mass casualty scenario. Few of these ventilators possess the minimum alarm functionality and consistently deliver the prescribed tidal volume that allows for safe and effective ventilation of critically ill pediatric patients. These findings will help clinicians understand the performance and limitations of available ventilators intended for use in children.

AB - Objective: Modern health care systems may be inadequately prepared for mass casualty respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Current health policy has focused on the stockpiling of emergency ventilators, though little is known about the performance of these ventilators under conditions of respiratory failure in adults and children. In this study, we seek to compare emergency ventilator performance characteristics using a test lung simulating pediatric lung injury. Design: Evaluation of ventilator performance using a test lung. Setting: Laboratory. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Six transport/emergency ventilators capable of adult/child application were chosen on the basis of manufacturer specifications, Autovent 3000, Eagle Univent 754, EPV 100, LP-10, LTV 1200, and Parapac 200D. Manufacturer specifications for each ventilator were reviewed and compared with known standards for alarms and functionality for surge capacity ventilators. The delivered tidal volume, gas flow characteristics, and airway pressure waveforms were evaluated in vitro using a mechanical test lung to model pediatric lung injury and integrated software. Test lung and flow meter recordings were analyzed over a range of ventilator settings. Of the six ventilators assessed, only two had the minimum recommended alarm capability. Four of the six ventilators tested were capable of being set to deliver a tidal volume of less than 200 mL. The delivered tidal volume for all ventilators was within 8% of the nominal setting at a positive end expiratory pressure of zero but was reduced significantly with the addition of positive end expiratory pressure (range, ±10% to 30%; p <. 01). All ventilators tested performed comparably at higher set tidal volumes; however, only three of the ventilators tested delivered a tidal volume across the range of ventilator settings that was comparable to that of a standard intensive care unit ventilator. Conclusions: Multiple ventilators are available for the provision of ventilation to children with respiratory failure in a mass casualty scenario. Few of these ventilators possess the minimum alarm functionality and consistently deliver the prescribed tidal volume that allows for safe and effective ventilation of critically ill pediatric patients. These findings will help clinicians understand the performance and limitations of available ventilators intended for use in children.

KW - emergency preparedness

KW - emergency ventilator

KW - mass casualty respiratory failure

KW - pediatric

KW - stockpile

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81155135064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81155135064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820ab891

DO - 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820ab891

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

JF - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1529-7535

IS - 6

ER -