Cumulative impact of periodic top-down communications on infection prevention practices and outcomes in two units

Pavani Rangachari, Michael P. Madaio, R. Karl Rethemeyer, Peggy Wagner, Lauren Hall, Siddharth Roy, John Peter Rissing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The problem of interest in this study is the challenge of consistent implementation of evidence-based infection prevention practices at the unit level, a challenge broadly characterized as "change implementation failure." The theoretical literature suggests that periodic top-down communications promoting tacit knowledge exchanges across professional subgroups may be effective for enabling change in health care organizations. However, gaps remain in understanding the mechanisms by which top-down communications enable practice change at the unit level. Our study sought to both validate the theoretical literature and address this gap. Purpose: Correspondingly, this study posed two research questions. (1) What is the impact of periodic "top-down" communications on practice change at the unit level? (2) What are the "unit-level" communication dynamics enabling practice changes? Whereas this article focuses on addressing the first question, the second question has been addressed in an earlier Health Care Management Review article (Rangachari et al., 2013). Methods: A prospective study was conducted in two intensive care units at an academic health center. Both units had low baseline adherence to central line bundle (CLB) and higher-than-expected catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Periodic top-down communication interventions were conducted over 52 weeks to promote CLB adherence in both units. Simultaneously, the study examined (a) unit-level communication dynamics related to CLB through weekly "communication logs," completed by unit physicians, nurses, and managers, and (b) unit outcomes, that is, CLB adherence and CRBSI rates. Findings: Both units showed increased adherence to CLB and significant, sustained declines in CRBSIs. Results showed that the interventions cumulatively had a significant negative (desired) impact on "catheter days," that is, central catheter use. Practice Implications: Results help validate the theoretical literature and identify evidence-based management strategies for practice change at the unit level. They suggest that periodic top-down communications have the potential to modify interprofessional knowledge exchanges and enable practice change at the unit level, leading to significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-336
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Communication
Infection
Catheter-Related Infections
Catheters
Delivery of Health Care
Nurse Administrators
Top-down
Practice Management
Intensive Care Units
Prospective Studies
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Adherence
Health
Research

Keywords

  • communication and knowledge exchange
  • culture of safety
  • evidence-based management
  • evidence-based practices
  • infection prevention
  • mixed-method research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Cumulative impact of periodic top-down communications on infection prevention practices and outcomes in two units. / Rangachari, Pavani; Madaio, Michael P.; Rethemeyer, R. Karl; Wagner, Peggy; Hall, Lauren; Roy, Siddharth; Rissing, John Peter.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 324-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rangachari, Pavani ; Madaio, Michael P. ; Rethemeyer, R. Karl ; Wagner, Peggy ; Hall, Lauren ; Roy, Siddharth ; Rissing, John Peter. / Cumulative impact of periodic top-down communications on infection prevention practices and outcomes in two units. In: Health Care Management Review. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 324-336.
@article{4569a3482eb44132a89037823b8923be,
title = "Cumulative impact of periodic top-down communications on infection prevention practices and outcomes in two units",
abstract = "Background: The problem of interest in this study is the challenge of consistent implementation of evidence-based infection prevention practices at the unit level, a challenge broadly characterized as {"}change implementation failure.{"} The theoretical literature suggests that periodic top-down communications promoting tacit knowledge exchanges across professional subgroups may be effective for enabling change in health care organizations. However, gaps remain in understanding the mechanisms by which top-down communications enable practice change at the unit level. Our study sought to both validate the theoretical literature and address this gap. Purpose: Correspondingly, this study posed two research questions. (1) What is the impact of periodic {"}top-down{"} communications on practice change at the unit level? (2) What are the {"}unit-level{"} communication dynamics enabling practice changes? Whereas this article focuses on addressing the first question, the second question has been addressed in an earlier Health Care Management Review article (Rangachari et al., 2013). Methods: A prospective study was conducted in two intensive care units at an academic health center. Both units had low baseline adherence to central line bundle (CLB) and higher-than-expected catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Periodic top-down communication interventions were conducted over 52 weeks to promote CLB adherence in both units. Simultaneously, the study examined (a) unit-level communication dynamics related to CLB through weekly {"}communication logs,{"} completed by unit physicians, nurses, and managers, and (b) unit outcomes, that is, CLB adherence and CRBSI rates. Findings: Both units showed increased adherence to CLB and significant, sustained declines in CRBSIs. Results showed that the interventions cumulatively had a significant negative (desired) impact on {"}catheter days,{"} that is, central catheter use. Practice Implications: Results help validate the theoretical literature and identify evidence-based management strategies for practice change at the unit level. They suggest that periodic top-down communications have the potential to modify interprofessional knowledge exchanges and enable practice change at the unit level, leading to significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs.",
keywords = "communication and knowledge exchange, culture of safety, evidence-based management, evidence-based practices, infection prevention, mixed-method research",
author = "Pavani Rangachari and Madaio, {Michael P.} and Rethemeyer, {R. Karl} and Peggy Wagner and Lauren Hall and Siddharth Roy and Rissing, {John Peter}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0000000000000038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "324--336",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cumulative impact of periodic top-down communications on infection prevention practices and outcomes in two units

AU - Rangachari, Pavani

AU - Madaio, Michael P.

AU - Rethemeyer, R. Karl

AU - Wagner, Peggy

AU - Hall, Lauren

AU - Roy, Siddharth

AU - Rissing, John Peter

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: The problem of interest in this study is the challenge of consistent implementation of evidence-based infection prevention practices at the unit level, a challenge broadly characterized as "change implementation failure." The theoretical literature suggests that periodic top-down communications promoting tacit knowledge exchanges across professional subgroups may be effective for enabling change in health care organizations. However, gaps remain in understanding the mechanisms by which top-down communications enable practice change at the unit level. Our study sought to both validate the theoretical literature and address this gap. Purpose: Correspondingly, this study posed two research questions. (1) What is the impact of periodic "top-down" communications on practice change at the unit level? (2) What are the "unit-level" communication dynamics enabling practice changes? Whereas this article focuses on addressing the first question, the second question has been addressed in an earlier Health Care Management Review article (Rangachari et al., 2013). Methods: A prospective study was conducted in two intensive care units at an academic health center. Both units had low baseline adherence to central line bundle (CLB) and higher-than-expected catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Periodic top-down communication interventions were conducted over 52 weeks to promote CLB adherence in both units. Simultaneously, the study examined (a) unit-level communication dynamics related to CLB through weekly "communication logs," completed by unit physicians, nurses, and managers, and (b) unit outcomes, that is, CLB adherence and CRBSI rates. Findings: Both units showed increased adherence to CLB and significant, sustained declines in CRBSIs. Results showed that the interventions cumulatively had a significant negative (desired) impact on "catheter days," that is, central catheter use. Practice Implications: Results help validate the theoretical literature and identify evidence-based management strategies for practice change at the unit level. They suggest that periodic top-down communications have the potential to modify interprofessional knowledge exchanges and enable practice change at the unit level, leading to significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs.

AB - Background: The problem of interest in this study is the challenge of consistent implementation of evidence-based infection prevention practices at the unit level, a challenge broadly characterized as "change implementation failure." The theoretical literature suggests that periodic top-down communications promoting tacit knowledge exchanges across professional subgroups may be effective for enabling change in health care organizations. However, gaps remain in understanding the mechanisms by which top-down communications enable practice change at the unit level. Our study sought to both validate the theoretical literature and address this gap. Purpose: Correspondingly, this study posed two research questions. (1) What is the impact of periodic "top-down" communications on practice change at the unit level? (2) What are the "unit-level" communication dynamics enabling practice changes? Whereas this article focuses on addressing the first question, the second question has been addressed in an earlier Health Care Management Review article (Rangachari et al., 2013). Methods: A prospective study was conducted in two intensive care units at an academic health center. Both units had low baseline adherence to central line bundle (CLB) and higher-than-expected catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Periodic top-down communication interventions were conducted over 52 weeks to promote CLB adherence in both units. Simultaneously, the study examined (a) unit-level communication dynamics related to CLB through weekly "communication logs," completed by unit physicians, nurses, and managers, and (b) unit outcomes, that is, CLB adherence and CRBSI rates. Findings: Both units showed increased adherence to CLB and significant, sustained declines in CRBSIs. Results showed that the interventions cumulatively had a significant negative (desired) impact on "catheter days," that is, central catheter use. Practice Implications: Results help validate the theoretical literature and identify evidence-based management strategies for practice change at the unit level. They suggest that periodic top-down communications have the potential to modify interprofessional knowledge exchanges and enable practice change at the unit level, leading to significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs.

KW - communication and knowledge exchange

KW - culture of safety

KW - evidence-based management

KW - evidence-based practices

KW - infection prevention

KW - mixed-method research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942194111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942194111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000038

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000038

M3 - Article

C2 - 25120195

AN - SCOPUS:84942194111

VL - 40

SP - 324

EP - 336

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 4

ER -