Defining “Community” from the perspectives of individuals with sickle cell disease in rural Georgia

Raymona H. Lawrence, Bettye A. Apenteng, April M. Schueths, Swaha Pattanaik, Robert W Gibson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) often struggle to transition from pediatric to adult-centered medical environments. One probable cause is that many transition programs do not focus on what happens when patients leave the medical environment and return to their communities. Little is known about how individuals with SCD define community. Therefore, we worked with health care providers at four rural Georgia SCD outreach clinics to conduct qualitative interviews with 21 individuals who had transitioned to adult SCD care. The biopsychosocial ecological model was the framework for the study. Findings indicated that individuals with SCD describe five aspects of community that span across the family, community, and society-levels of the biopsychosocial ecological model: 1) immediate family, friends, and social circle; 2) relationships with medical providers; 3) geographic community/neighbors; 4) church/spiritual support; and 5) society. Interventions designed to improve SCD in rural communities may be most effective if they include not only support from family but also enhanced neighborhood supports and links between adults with SCD and relevant community organizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1438-1454
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sickle Cell Anemia
Rural Population
Health Personnel
Organizations
Interviews
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Biopsychosocial ecological model
  • Community engagement
  • Rural
  • Sickle cell disease
  • Transition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Defining “Community” from the perspectives of individuals with sickle cell disease in rural Georgia. / Lawrence, Raymona H.; Apenteng, Bettye A.; Schueths, April M.; Pattanaik, Swaha; Gibson, Robert W.

In: Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.11.2018, p. 1438-1454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lawrence, Raymona H. ; Apenteng, Bettye A. ; Schueths, April M. ; Pattanaik, Swaha ; Gibson, Robert W. / Defining “Community” from the perspectives of individuals with sickle cell disease in rural Georgia. In: Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 1438-1454.
@article{c923b8be15d9471bbb319e59720cbbf8,
title = "Defining “Community” from the perspectives of individuals with sickle cell disease in rural Georgia",
abstract = "Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) often struggle to transition from pediatric to adult-centered medical environments. One probable cause is that many transition programs do not focus on what happens when patients leave the medical environment and return to their communities. Little is known about how individuals with SCD define community. Therefore, we worked with health care providers at four rural Georgia SCD outreach clinics to conduct qualitative interviews with 21 individuals who had transitioned to adult SCD care. The biopsychosocial ecological model was the framework for the study. Findings indicated that individuals with SCD describe five aspects of community that span across the family, community, and society-levels of the biopsychosocial ecological model: 1) immediate family, friends, and social circle; 2) relationships with medical providers; 3) geographic community/neighbors; 4) church/spiritual support; and 5) society. Interventions designed to improve SCD in rural communities may be most effective if they include not only support from family but also enhanced neighborhood supports and links between adults with SCD and relevant community organizations.",
keywords = "Biopsychosocial ecological model, Community engagement, Rural, Sickle cell disease, Transition",
author = "Lawrence, {Raymona H.} and Apenteng, {Bettye A.} and Schueths, {April M.} and Swaha Pattanaik and Gibson, {Robert W}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/hpu.2018.0105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1438--1454",
journal = "Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved",
issn = "1049-2089",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining “Community” from the perspectives of individuals with sickle cell disease in rural Georgia

AU - Lawrence, Raymona H.

AU - Apenteng, Bettye A.

AU - Schueths, April M.

AU - Pattanaik, Swaha

AU - Gibson, Robert W

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) often struggle to transition from pediatric to adult-centered medical environments. One probable cause is that many transition programs do not focus on what happens when patients leave the medical environment and return to their communities. Little is known about how individuals with SCD define community. Therefore, we worked with health care providers at four rural Georgia SCD outreach clinics to conduct qualitative interviews with 21 individuals who had transitioned to adult SCD care. The biopsychosocial ecological model was the framework for the study. Findings indicated that individuals with SCD describe five aspects of community that span across the family, community, and society-levels of the biopsychosocial ecological model: 1) immediate family, friends, and social circle; 2) relationships with medical providers; 3) geographic community/neighbors; 4) church/spiritual support; and 5) society. Interventions designed to improve SCD in rural communities may be most effective if they include not only support from family but also enhanced neighborhood supports and links between adults with SCD and relevant community organizations.

AB - Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) often struggle to transition from pediatric to adult-centered medical environments. One probable cause is that many transition programs do not focus on what happens when patients leave the medical environment and return to their communities. Little is known about how individuals with SCD define community. Therefore, we worked with health care providers at four rural Georgia SCD outreach clinics to conduct qualitative interviews with 21 individuals who had transitioned to adult SCD care. The biopsychosocial ecological model was the framework for the study. Findings indicated that individuals with SCD describe five aspects of community that span across the family, community, and society-levels of the biopsychosocial ecological model: 1) immediate family, friends, and social circle; 2) relationships with medical providers; 3) geographic community/neighbors; 4) church/spiritual support; and 5) society. Interventions designed to improve SCD in rural communities may be most effective if they include not only support from family but also enhanced neighborhood supports and links between adults with SCD and relevant community organizations.

KW - Biopsychosocial ecological model

KW - Community engagement

KW - Rural

KW - Sickle cell disease

KW - Transition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056609425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056609425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/hpu.2018.0105

DO - 10.1353/hpu.2018.0105

M3 - Article

C2 - 30449756

AN - SCOPUS:85056609425

VL - 29

SP - 1438

EP - 1454

JO - Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

JF - Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

SN - 1049-2089

IS - 4

ER -