Defining "good" and "poor" outcomes in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: A multidimensional data-driven approach

Ilya A. Lipkovich, Walter Deberdt, John G. Csernansky, Peter Buckley, Joseph Peuskens, Sara Kollack-Walker, Matthew Rotelli, John P. Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study's goal was to characterize the typology of patient outcomes based on social and occupational functioning and psychiatric symptoms following antipsychotic drug treatment, and to explore predictors of group membership representing the best/worst outcomes. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to define groups of patients (n = 1449) based on endpoint values for psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and useful work measured up to 30 weeks of treatment. Stepwise logistic regression was used to construct predictive models of cluster membership for baseline predictors, and with 2/4/8 weeks of treatment. Five distinct clusters of patients were identified at endpoint (Clusters A-E). Patients in Cluster A (25.6%, best outcome) had minimal psychiatric symptoms and mild functional impairment, while patients in Cluster D (14.3%) and E (14.8%) (worst outcome) had moderate-to-severe symptoms and severe functional impairment. Occupational functioning, disorganized thinking, and positive symptoms were sufficient to describe the clusters. Membership in the best/worst clusters was predicted by baseline scores for functioning and symptom severity, and by early changes in symptoms with treatment. Psychiatric symptoms and functioning provided complementary information to describe treatment outcomes. Early symptom response significantly improved the prediction of outcome, suggesting that early monitoring of treatment response may be useful in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume170
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 30 2009

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
Schizophrenia
Psychiatry
Therapeutics
Antipsychotic Agents
Cluster Analysis
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Antipsychotic
  • Cluster analysis
  • Functioning
  • Psychiatric symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Lipkovich, I. A., Deberdt, W., Csernansky, J. G., Buckley, P., Peuskens, J., Kollack-Walker, S., ... Houston, J. P. (2009). Defining "good" and "poor" outcomes in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: A multidimensional data-driven approach. Psychiatry Research, 170(2-3), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.09.004

Defining "good" and "poor" outcomes in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder : A multidimensional data-driven approach. / Lipkovich, Ilya A.; Deberdt, Walter; Csernansky, John G.; Buckley, Peter; Peuskens, Joseph; Kollack-Walker, Sara; Rotelli, Matthew; Houston, John P.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 170, No. 2-3, 30.12.2009, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lipkovich, IA, Deberdt, W, Csernansky, JG, Buckley, P, Peuskens, J, Kollack-Walker, S, Rotelli, M & Houston, JP 2009, 'Defining "good" and "poor" outcomes in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: A multidimensional data-driven approach', Psychiatry Research, vol. 170, no. 2-3, pp. 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.09.004
Lipkovich, Ilya A. ; Deberdt, Walter ; Csernansky, John G. ; Buckley, Peter ; Peuskens, Joseph ; Kollack-Walker, Sara ; Rotelli, Matthew ; Houston, John P. / Defining "good" and "poor" outcomes in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder : A multidimensional data-driven approach. In: Psychiatry Research. 2009 ; Vol. 170, No. 2-3. pp. 161-167.
@article{acebca26ef74496fa28d9a5a043c9a6f,
title = "Defining {"}good{"} and {"}poor{"} outcomes in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: A multidimensional data-driven approach",
abstract = "The study's goal was to characterize the typology of patient outcomes based on social and occupational functioning and psychiatric symptoms following antipsychotic drug treatment, and to explore predictors of group membership representing the best/worst outcomes. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to define groups of patients (n = 1449) based on endpoint values for psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and useful work measured up to 30 weeks of treatment. Stepwise logistic regression was used to construct predictive models of cluster membership for baseline predictors, and with 2/4/8 weeks of treatment. Five distinct clusters of patients were identified at endpoint (Clusters A-E). Patients in Cluster A (25.6{\%}, best outcome) had minimal psychiatric symptoms and mild functional impairment, while patients in Cluster D (14.3{\%}) and E (14.8{\%}) (worst outcome) had moderate-to-severe symptoms and severe functional impairment. Occupational functioning, disorganized thinking, and positive symptoms were sufficient to describe the clusters. Membership in the best/worst clusters was predicted by baseline scores for functioning and symptom severity, and by early changes in symptoms with treatment. Psychiatric symptoms and functioning provided complementary information to describe treatment outcomes. Early symptom response significantly improved the prediction of outcome, suggesting that early monitoring of treatment response may be useful in clinical practice.",
keywords = "Antipsychotic, Cluster analysis, Functioning, Psychiatric symptoms",
author = "Lipkovich, {Ilya A.} and Walter Deberdt and Csernansky, {John G.} and Peter Buckley and Joseph Peuskens and Sara Kollack-Walker and Matthew Rotelli and Houston, {John P.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2008.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "161--167",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining "good" and "poor" outcomes in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

T2 - A multidimensional data-driven approach

AU - Lipkovich, Ilya A.

AU - Deberdt, Walter

AU - Csernansky, John G.

AU - Buckley, Peter

AU - Peuskens, Joseph

AU - Kollack-Walker, Sara

AU - Rotelli, Matthew

AU - Houston, John P.

PY - 2009/12/30

Y1 - 2009/12/30

N2 - The study's goal was to characterize the typology of patient outcomes based on social and occupational functioning and psychiatric symptoms following antipsychotic drug treatment, and to explore predictors of group membership representing the best/worst outcomes. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to define groups of patients (n = 1449) based on endpoint values for psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and useful work measured up to 30 weeks of treatment. Stepwise logistic regression was used to construct predictive models of cluster membership for baseline predictors, and with 2/4/8 weeks of treatment. Five distinct clusters of patients were identified at endpoint (Clusters A-E). Patients in Cluster A (25.6%, best outcome) had minimal psychiatric symptoms and mild functional impairment, while patients in Cluster D (14.3%) and E (14.8%) (worst outcome) had moderate-to-severe symptoms and severe functional impairment. Occupational functioning, disorganized thinking, and positive symptoms were sufficient to describe the clusters. Membership in the best/worst clusters was predicted by baseline scores for functioning and symptom severity, and by early changes in symptoms with treatment. Psychiatric symptoms and functioning provided complementary information to describe treatment outcomes. Early symptom response significantly improved the prediction of outcome, suggesting that early monitoring of treatment response may be useful in clinical practice.

AB - The study's goal was to characterize the typology of patient outcomes based on social and occupational functioning and psychiatric symptoms following antipsychotic drug treatment, and to explore predictors of group membership representing the best/worst outcomes. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to define groups of patients (n = 1449) based on endpoint values for psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and useful work measured up to 30 weeks of treatment. Stepwise logistic regression was used to construct predictive models of cluster membership for baseline predictors, and with 2/4/8 weeks of treatment. Five distinct clusters of patients were identified at endpoint (Clusters A-E). Patients in Cluster A (25.6%, best outcome) had minimal psychiatric symptoms and mild functional impairment, while patients in Cluster D (14.3%) and E (14.8%) (worst outcome) had moderate-to-severe symptoms and severe functional impairment. Occupational functioning, disorganized thinking, and positive symptoms were sufficient to describe the clusters. Membership in the best/worst clusters was predicted by baseline scores for functioning and symptom severity, and by early changes in symptoms with treatment. Psychiatric symptoms and functioning provided complementary information to describe treatment outcomes. Early symptom response significantly improved the prediction of outcome, suggesting that early monitoring of treatment response may be useful in clinical practice.

KW - Antipsychotic

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - Functioning

KW - Psychiatric symptoms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449524675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449524675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.09.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 19897252

AN - SCOPUS:70449524675

VL - 170

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 2-3

ER -