Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease

Hannes Devos, Alice Nieuwboer, Mark Tant, Willy De Weerdt, Wim Vandenberghe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the most accurate clinical predictors of fitness to drive (FTDr) in Huntington disease (HD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 60 active drivers: 30 patients with manifest HD (8 women) and 30 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Mean (SD) age of the HD group was 50 (12) years and median (Q1-Q3) disease duration was 24 (12-48) months. A clinical battery consisting of a driving history questionnaire, the cognitive section of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS), Trail Making Test, and Mini-Mental State Examination, as well as a driving simulator evaluation, were administered to all participants. Additionally, the subjects with HD completed the motor, behavioral, and Total Functional Capacity sections of the UHDRS and underwent an official FTDr evaluation comprising visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests. The blinded neurologist's appraisal of FTDr and the 3 most predictive clinical tests were compared with the official pass/fail FTDr decision. Results: The patients with HD performed worse on all tests of the clinical battery and driving simulator than the healthy controls. Fifteen patients with HD (50%) failed the FTDr evaluation. The blinded neurologist correctly classified 21 patients (70%). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Stroop word reading, and Trail Making Test B provided the best model (R2 - 0.49) to predict FTDr, correctly classifying 26 patients (87%). Conclusions: Half of active drivers with HD fail a driving evaluation and pose a potential hazard on the road. Our results suggest that those at risk can be accurately identified using a clinical screening tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1975-1982
Number of pages8
JournalNeurology
Volume79
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 6 2012

Fingerprint

Huntington Disease
Trail Making Test
Stroop Test
Drive
Reading
Cross-Sectional Studies
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Devos, H., Nieuwboer, A., Tant, M., De Weerdt, W., & Vandenberghe, W. (2012). Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease. Neurology, 79(19), 1975-1982. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735d11

Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease. / Devos, Hannes; Nieuwboer, Alice; Tant, Mark; De Weerdt, Willy; Vandenberghe, Wim.

In: Neurology, Vol. 79, No. 19, 06.11.2012, p. 1975-1982.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Devos, H, Nieuwboer, A, Tant, M, De Weerdt, W & Vandenberghe, W 2012, 'Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease', Neurology, vol. 79, no. 19, pp. 1975-1982. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735d11
Devos H, Nieuwboer A, Tant M, De Weerdt W, Vandenberghe W. Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease. Neurology. 2012 Nov 6;79(19):1975-1982. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735d11
Devos, Hannes ; Nieuwboer, Alice ; Tant, Mark ; De Weerdt, Willy ; Vandenberghe, Wim. / Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease. In: Neurology. 2012 ; Vol. 79, No. 19. pp. 1975-1982.
@article{c0a168c7df1b4a2099ac5d87bae43324,
title = "Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease",
abstract = "Objectives: To identify the most accurate clinical predictors of fitness to drive (FTDr) in Huntington disease (HD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 60 active drivers: 30 patients with manifest HD (8 women) and 30 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Mean (SD) age of the HD group was 50 (12) years and median (Q1-Q3) disease duration was 24 (12-48) months. A clinical battery consisting of a driving history questionnaire, the cognitive section of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS), Trail Making Test, and Mini-Mental State Examination, as well as a driving simulator evaluation, were administered to all participants. Additionally, the subjects with HD completed the motor, behavioral, and Total Functional Capacity sections of the UHDRS and underwent an official FTDr evaluation comprising visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests. The blinded neurologist's appraisal of FTDr and the 3 most predictive clinical tests were compared with the official pass/fail FTDr decision. Results: The patients with HD performed worse on all tests of the clinical battery and driving simulator than the healthy controls. Fifteen patients with HD (50{\%}) failed the FTDr evaluation. The blinded neurologist correctly classified 21 patients (70{\%}). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Stroop word reading, and Trail Making Test B provided the best model (R2 - 0.49) to predict FTDr, correctly classifying 26 patients (87{\%}). Conclusions: Half of active drivers with HD fail a driving evaluation and pose a potential hazard on the road. Our results suggest that those at risk can be accurately identified using a clinical screening tool.",
author = "Hannes Devos and Alice Nieuwboer and Mark Tant and {De Weerdt}, Willy and Wim Vandenberghe",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735d11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1975--1982",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of fitness to drive in huntington disease

AU - Devos, Hannes

AU - Nieuwboer, Alice

AU - Tant, Mark

AU - De Weerdt, Willy

AU - Vandenberghe, Wim

PY - 2012/11/6

Y1 - 2012/11/6

N2 - Objectives: To identify the most accurate clinical predictors of fitness to drive (FTDr) in Huntington disease (HD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 60 active drivers: 30 patients with manifest HD (8 women) and 30 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Mean (SD) age of the HD group was 50 (12) years and median (Q1-Q3) disease duration was 24 (12-48) months. A clinical battery consisting of a driving history questionnaire, the cognitive section of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS), Trail Making Test, and Mini-Mental State Examination, as well as a driving simulator evaluation, were administered to all participants. Additionally, the subjects with HD completed the motor, behavioral, and Total Functional Capacity sections of the UHDRS and underwent an official FTDr evaluation comprising visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests. The blinded neurologist's appraisal of FTDr and the 3 most predictive clinical tests were compared with the official pass/fail FTDr decision. Results: The patients with HD performed worse on all tests of the clinical battery and driving simulator than the healthy controls. Fifteen patients with HD (50%) failed the FTDr evaluation. The blinded neurologist correctly classified 21 patients (70%). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Stroop word reading, and Trail Making Test B provided the best model (R2 - 0.49) to predict FTDr, correctly classifying 26 patients (87%). Conclusions: Half of active drivers with HD fail a driving evaluation and pose a potential hazard on the road. Our results suggest that those at risk can be accurately identified using a clinical screening tool.

AB - Objectives: To identify the most accurate clinical predictors of fitness to drive (FTDr) in Huntington disease (HD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 60 active drivers: 30 patients with manifest HD (8 women) and 30 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Mean (SD) age of the HD group was 50 (12) years and median (Q1-Q3) disease duration was 24 (12-48) months. A clinical battery consisting of a driving history questionnaire, the cognitive section of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS), Trail Making Test, and Mini-Mental State Examination, as well as a driving simulator evaluation, were administered to all participants. Additionally, the subjects with HD completed the motor, behavioral, and Total Functional Capacity sections of the UHDRS and underwent an official FTDr evaluation comprising visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests. The blinded neurologist's appraisal of FTDr and the 3 most predictive clinical tests were compared with the official pass/fail FTDr decision. Results: The patients with HD performed worse on all tests of the clinical battery and driving simulator than the healthy controls. Fifteen patients with HD (50%) failed the FTDr evaluation. The blinded neurologist correctly classified 21 patients (70%). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Stroop word reading, and Trail Making Test B provided the best model (R2 - 0.49) to predict FTDr, correctly classifying 26 patients (87%). Conclusions: Half of active drivers with HD fail a driving evaluation and pose a potential hazard on the road. Our results suggest that those at risk can be accurately identified using a clinical screening tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871213495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871213495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735d11

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735d11

M3 - Article

C2 - 23100397

AN - SCOPUS:84871213495

VL - 79

SP - 1975

EP - 1982

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 19

ER -