Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research

Scott Y.H. Kim, Paul S. Appelbaum, Jeffrey Swan, T. Scott Stroup, Joseph Patrick McEvoy, Donald C. Goff, Dilip V. Jeste, J. Steven Lamberti, Adrian Leibovici, Eric D. Caine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although people with schizophrenia display impaired abilities for consent, it is not known how much impairment constitutes incapacity. Aims: To assess a method for determining the categorical capacity status of potential participants in schizophrenia research. Method: Expert-judgement validation of capacity thresholds on the sub-scales of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in 91 people with severe mental illness and 40 controls. Results: The ROC areas under the curve for the understanding, appreciation and reasoning sub-scales of the MacCAT-CR were 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90). These findings yielded negative and positive predictive values of incapacity that can guide the practice of investigators and research ethics committees. Conclusions: By performing such validation studies for a few categories of research with varying risks and benefits, it might be possible to create evidence-based capacity determination guidelines for most schizophrenia research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-43
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume191
Issue numberJULY
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007

Fingerprint

Informed Consent
Schizophrenia
Research
ROC Curve
Mental Competency
Aptitude
Validation Studies
Research Ethics Committees
Area Under Curve
Research Personnel
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. / Kim, Scott Y.H.; Appelbaum, Paul S.; Swan, Jeffrey; Stroup, T. Scott; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick; Goff, Donald C.; Jeste, Dilip V.; Lamberti, J. Steven; Leibovici, Adrian; Caine, Eric D.

In: British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 191, No. JULY, 01.07.2007, p. 38-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, SYH, Appelbaum, PS, Swan, J, Stroup, TS, McEvoy, JP, Goff, DC, Jeste, DV, Lamberti, JS, Leibovici, A & Caine, ED 2007, 'Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research', British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 191, no. JULY, pp. 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.033324
Kim, Scott Y.H. ; Appelbaum, Paul S. ; Swan, Jeffrey ; Stroup, T. Scott ; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick ; Goff, Donald C. ; Jeste, Dilip V. ; Lamberti, J. Steven ; Leibovici, Adrian ; Caine, Eric D. / Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. In: British Journal of Psychiatry. 2007 ; Vol. 191, No. JULY. pp. 38-43.
@article{a88d38fc40084b33bd8901e3494ea618,
title = "Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research",
abstract = "Background: Although people with schizophrenia display impaired abilities for consent, it is not known how much impairment constitutes incapacity. Aims: To assess a method for determining the categorical capacity status of potential participants in schizophrenia research. Method: Expert-judgement validation of capacity thresholds on the sub-scales of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in 91 people with severe mental illness and 40 controls. Results: The ROC areas under the curve for the understanding, appreciation and reasoning sub-scales of the MacCAT-CR were 0.94 (95{\%} CI 0.88-0.99), 0.85 (95{\%} CI 0.76-0.94) and 0.80 (95{\%} CI 0.70-0.90). These findings yielded negative and positive predictive values of incapacity that can guide the practice of investigators and research ethics committees. Conclusions: By performing such validation studies for a few categories of research with varying risks and benefits, it might be possible to create evidence-based capacity determination guidelines for most schizophrenia research.",
author = "Kim, {Scott Y.H.} and Appelbaum, {Paul S.} and Jeffrey Swan and Stroup, {T. Scott} and McEvoy, {Joseph Patrick} and Goff, {Donald C.} and Jeste, {Dilip V.} and Lamberti, {J. Steven} and Adrian Leibovici and Caine, {Eric D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1192/bjp.bp.106.033324",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "38--43",
journal = "British Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0007-1250",
publisher = "Royal College of Psychiatrists",
number = "JULY",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research

AU - Kim, Scott Y.H.

AU - Appelbaum, Paul S.

AU - Swan, Jeffrey

AU - Stroup, T. Scott

AU - McEvoy, Joseph Patrick

AU - Goff, Donald C.

AU - Jeste, Dilip V.

AU - Lamberti, J. Steven

AU - Leibovici, Adrian

AU - Caine, Eric D.

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - Background: Although people with schizophrenia display impaired abilities for consent, it is not known how much impairment constitutes incapacity. Aims: To assess a method for determining the categorical capacity status of potential participants in schizophrenia research. Method: Expert-judgement validation of capacity thresholds on the sub-scales of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in 91 people with severe mental illness and 40 controls. Results: The ROC areas under the curve for the understanding, appreciation and reasoning sub-scales of the MacCAT-CR were 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90). These findings yielded negative and positive predictive values of incapacity that can guide the practice of investigators and research ethics committees. Conclusions: By performing such validation studies for a few categories of research with varying risks and benefits, it might be possible to create evidence-based capacity determination guidelines for most schizophrenia research.

AB - Background: Although people with schizophrenia display impaired abilities for consent, it is not known how much impairment constitutes incapacity. Aims: To assess a method for determining the categorical capacity status of potential participants in schizophrenia research. Method: Expert-judgement validation of capacity thresholds on the sub-scales of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in 91 people with severe mental illness and 40 controls. Results: The ROC areas under the curve for the understanding, appreciation and reasoning sub-scales of the MacCAT-CR were 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90). These findings yielded negative and positive predictive values of incapacity that can guide the practice of investigators and research ethics committees. Conclusions: By performing such validation studies for a few categories of research with varying risks and benefits, it might be possible to create evidence-based capacity determination guidelines for most schizophrenia research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447123365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447123365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.033324

DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.033324

M3 - Article

C2 - 17602123

AN - SCOPUS:34447123365

VL - 191

SP - 38

EP - 43

JO - British Journal of Psychiatry

JF - British Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0007-1250

IS - JULY

ER -