Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial

Elizabeth J. Geller, Kelly J. Hankins, Brent A Parnell, Barbara Robinson Henley, Gena C. Dunivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of two voiding trial methods to predict postoperative voiding dysfunction. Methods: Women undergoing operations for urinary incontinence, prolapse, or both urinary incontinence and prolapse from November 2009 and March 2010 were randomized into one of two groups: retrograde or spontaneous. All patients underwent both techniques of voiding trials with randomization determining order. Results: Fifty women were randomized to 25 per group. Failure rates were 62% for retrograde and 84% for spontaneous. Women who failed both had 12.6±14.4 days of retention compared with 2.5±2.1 days for those who failed only one method (P=.004). The retrograde method had 94.4% sensitivity and 58.1% specificity to detect postoperative voiding dysfunction lasting at least 7 days compared with the spontaneous method with 100% sensitivity and 25.8% specificity. Positive and negative predictive values for the retrograde method were 56.7% and 94.7%, respectively, compared with the spontaneous method with 43.9% and 100%. Retrograde was preferred by patients (51.1% compared with 44.4%) regardless of randomization. Conclusion: The retrograde method is more accurate in evaluating postoperative voiding dysfunction, although both tests had a low positive predictive value. A longer period of retention was seen with failure of both methods. Retrograde was preferred by patients and provides an efficient alternative to the spontaneous method of voiding trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)637-642
Number of pages6
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume118
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Prolapse
Urinary Incontinence
Random Allocation
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction : A randomized controlled trial. / Geller, Elizabeth J.; Hankins, Kelly J.; Parnell, Brent A; Henley, Barbara Robinson; Dunivan, Gena C.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 118, No. 3, 01.09.2011, p. 637-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Geller, Elizabeth J. ; Hankins, Kelly J. ; Parnell, Brent A ; Henley, Barbara Robinson ; Dunivan, Gena C. / Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction : A randomized controlled trial. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011 ; Vol. 118, No. 3. pp. 637-642.
@article{3a7570234c2443e18b24bf38af910007,
title = "Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of two voiding trial methods to predict postoperative voiding dysfunction. Methods: Women undergoing operations for urinary incontinence, prolapse, or both urinary incontinence and prolapse from November 2009 and March 2010 were randomized into one of two groups: retrograde or spontaneous. All patients underwent both techniques of voiding trials with randomization determining order. Results: Fifty women were randomized to 25 per group. Failure rates were 62{\%} for retrograde and 84{\%} for spontaneous. Women who failed both had 12.6±14.4 days of retention compared with 2.5±2.1 days for those who failed only one method (P=.004). The retrograde method had 94.4{\%} sensitivity and 58.1{\%} specificity to detect postoperative voiding dysfunction lasting at least 7 days compared with the spontaneous method with 100{\%} sensitivity and 25.8{\%} specificity. Positive and negative predictive values for the retrograde method were 56.7{\%} and 94.7{\%}, respectively, compared with the spontaneous method with 43.9{\%} and 100{\%}. Retrograde was preferred by patients (51.1{\%} compared with 44.4{\%}) regardless of randomization. Conclusion: The retrograde method is more accurate in evaluating postoperative voiding dysfunction, although both tests had a low positive predictive value. A longer period of retention was seen with failure of both methods. Retrograde was preferred by patients and provides an efficient alternative to the spontaneous method of voiding trial.",
author = "Geller, {Elizabeth J.} and Hankins, {Kelly J.} and Parnell, {Brent A} and Henley, {Barbara Robinson} and Dunivan, {Gena C.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0b013e318229e8dd",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "637--642",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Geller, Elizabeth J.

AU - Hankins, Kelly J.

AU - Parnell, Brent A

AU - Henley, Barbara Robinson

AU - Dunivan, Gena C.

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of two voiding trial methods to predict postoperative voiding dysfunction. Methods: Women undergoing operations for urinary incontinence, prolapse, or both urinary incontinence and prolapse from November 2009 and March 2010 were randomized into one of two groups: retrograde or spontaneous. All patients underwent both techniques of voiding trials with randomization determining order. Results: Fifty women were randomized to 25 per group. Failure rates were 62% for retrograde and 84% for spontaneous. Women who failed both had 12.6±14.4 days of retention compared with 2.5±2.1 days for those who failed only one method (P=.004). The retrograde method had 94.4% sensitivity and 58.1% specificity to detect postoperative voiding dysfunction lasting at least 7 days compared with the spontaneous method with 100% sensitivity and 25.8% specificity. Positive and negative predictive values for the retrograde method were 56.7% and 94.7%, respectively, compared with the spontaneous method with 43.9% and 100%. Retrograde was preferred by patients (51.1% compared with 44.4%) regardless of randomization. Conclusion: The retrograde method is more accurate in evaluating postoperative voiding dysfunction, although both tests had a low positive predictive value. A longer period of retention was seen with failure of both methods. Retrograde was preferred by patients and provides an efficient alternative to the spontaneous method of voiding trial.

AB - Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of two voiding trial methods to predict postoperative voiding dysfunction. Methods: Women undergoing operations for urinary incontinence, prolapse, or both urinary incontinence and prolapse from November 2009 and March 2010 were randomized into one of two groups: retrograde or spontaneous. All patients underwent both techniques of voiding trials with randomization determining order. Results: Fifty women were randomized to 25 per group. Failure rates were 62% for retrograde and 84% for spontaneous. Women who failed both had 12.6±14.4 days of retention compared with 2.5±2.1 days for those who failed only one method (P=.004). The retrograde method had 94.4% sensitivity and 58.1% specificity to detect postoperative voiding dysfunction lasting at least 7 days compared with the spontaneous method with 100% sensitivity and 25.8% specificity. Positive and negative predictive values for the retrograde method were 56.7% and 94.7%, respectively, compared with the spontaneous method with 43.9% and 100%. Retrograde was preferred by patients (51.1% compared with 44.4%) regardless of randomization. Conclusion: The retrograde method is more accurate in evaluating postoperative voiding dysfunction, although both tests had a low positive predictive value. A longer period of retention was seen with failure of both methods. Retrograde was preferred by patients and provides an efficient alternative to the spontaneous method of voiding trial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052167329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052167329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318229e8dd

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318229e8dd

M3 - Article

C2 - 21860294

AN - SCOPUS:80052167329

VL - 118

SP - 637

EP - 642

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 3

ER -