Diagnostic value of the rapid assessment of postural instability in parkinson's disease (RAPID) questionnaire

Kwong Yew Raymond Chong, K. H. Lee, John Christopher Morgan, S. H. Mehta, P. Hall, Kapil Dev Sethi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: People with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) develop postural instability in the later stages of the ailment. Postural instability has traditionally been quantified with the Pull test even though its face validity is limited. We previously established cut-off scores for a three-part rapid assessment of postural instability (RAPID) questionnaire as a non-physical complement to the physical test. In the current study, the questionnaire was administered to a new group of PD subjects to evaluate the diagnostic value of the instrument. Methods: Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated for single and combined sections of the questionnaire by using the Pull test as the gold standard for assessing the presence of postural instability. Results: The questionnaire when used in its entirety gave the highest sensitivity (.71), whereas specificity was highest in the activities of daily living (.74) and fear of falling sections (.74). Net specificity decreased to.44 when the scores from the three sections of the questionnaire were combined. Conclusions: The high sensitivity of the RAPID questionnaire suggests that it may be used as an adjunct to the Pull test or solely if it is not convenient or contraindicated. The questionnaire may also be adapted for use via the telephone or internet. The limitation of the Pull test in revealing postural instability may explain the low specificity of the questionnaire, i.e. the questionnaire correctly identifies patients as unstable when the Pull test indicates normal postural control. It is hoped that the rapid identification of postural instability in PD may lead to increased awareness of the disease progression and fewer falls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)718-721
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Practice
Volume66
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Parkinson Disease
Accidental Falls
Surveys and Questionnaires
Activities of Daily Living
Telephone
Reproducibility of Results
Internet
Fear
Disease Progression
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Diagnostic value of the rapid assessment of postural instability in parkinson's disease (RAPID) questionnaire. / Chong, Kwong Yew Raymond; Lee, K. H.; Morgan, John Christopher; Mehta, S. H.; Hall, P.; Sethi, Kapil Dev.

In: International Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol. 66, No. 7, 01.07.2012, p. 718-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3336b472702b4d04b68e3150ade12353,
title = "Diagnostic value of the rapid assessment of postural instability in parkinson's disease (RAPID) questionnaire",
abstract = "Background: People with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) develop postural instability in the later stages of the ailment. Postural instability has traditionally been quantified with the Pull test even though its face validity is limited. We previously established cut-off scores for a three-part rapid assessment of postural instability (RAPID) questionnaire as a non-physical complement to the physical test. In the current study, the questionnaire was administered to a new group of PD subjects to evaluate the diagnostic value of the instrument. Methods: Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated for single and combined sections of the questionnaire by using the Pull test as the gold standard for assessing the presence of postural instability. Results: The questionnaire when used in its entirety gave the highest sensitivity (.71), whereas specificity was highest in the activities of daily living (.74) and fear of falling sections (.74). Net specificity decreased to.44 when the scores from the three sections of the questionnaire were combined. Conclusions: The high sensitivity of the RAPID questionnaire suggests that it may be used as an adjunct to the Pull test or solely if it is not convenient or contraindicated. The questionnaire may also be adapted for use via the telephone or internet. The limitation of the Pull test in revealing postural instability may explain the low specificity of the questionnaire, i.e. the questionnaire correctly identifies patients as unstable when the Pull test indicates normal postural control. It is hoped that the rapid identification of postural instability in PD may lead to increased awareness of the disease progression and fewer falls.",
author = "Chong, {Kwong Yew Raymond} and Lee, {K. H.} and Morgan, {John Christopher} and Mehta, {S. H.} and P. Hall and Sethi, {Kapil Dev}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02927.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "718--721",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Practice",
issn = "1368-5031",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic value of the rapid assessment of postural instability in parkinson's disease (RAPID) questionnaire

AU - Chong, Kwong Yew Raymond

AU - Lee, K. H.

AU - Morgan, John Christopher

AU - Mehta, S. H.

AU - Hall, P.

AU - Sethi, Kapil Dev

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Background: People with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) develop postural instability in the later stages of the ailment. Postural instability has traditionally been quantified with the Pull test even though its face validity is limited. We previously established cut-off scores for a three-part rapid assessment of postural instability (RAPID) questionnaire as a non-physical complement to the physical test. In the current study, the questionnaire was administered to a new group of PD subjects to evaluate the diagnostic value of the instrument. Methods: Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated for single and combined sections of the questionnaire by using the Pull test as the gold standard for assessing the presence of postural instability. Results: The questionnaire when used in its entirety gave the highest sensitivity (.71), whereas specificity was highest in the activities of daily living (.74) and fear of falling sections (.74). Net specificity decreased to.44 when the scores from the three sections of the questionnaire were combined. Conclusions: The high sensitivity of the RAPID questionnaire suggests that it may be used as an adjunct to the Pull test or solely if it is not convenient or contraindicated. The questionnaire may also be adapted for use via the telephone or internet. The limitation of the Pull test in revealing postural instability may explain the low specificity of the questionnaire, i.e. the questionnaire correctly identifies patients as unstable when the Pull test indicates normal postural control. It is hoped that the rapid identification of postural instability in PD may lead to increased awareness of the disease progression and fewer falls.

AB - Background: People with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) develop postural instability in the later stages of the ailment. Postural instability has traditionally been quantified with the Pull test even though its face validity is limited. We previously established cut-off scores for a three-part rapid assessment of postural instability (RAPID) questionnaire as a non-physical complement to the physical test. In the current study, the questionnaire was administered to a new group of PD subjects to evaluate the diagnostic value of the instrument. Methods: Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated for single and combined sections of the questionnaire by using the Pull test as the gold standard for assessing the presence of postural instability. Results: The questionnaire when used in its entirety gave the highest sensitivity (.71), whereas specificity was highest in the activities of daily living (.74) and fear of falling sections (.74). Net specificity decreased to.44 when the scores from the three sections of the questionnaire were combined. Conclusions: The high sensitivity of the RAPID questionnaire suggests that it may be used as an adjunct to the Pull test or solely if it is not convenient or contraindicated. The questionnaire may also be adapted for use via the telephone or internet. The limitation of the Pull test in revealing postural instability may explain the low specificity of the questionnaire, i.e. the questionnaire correctly identifies patients as unstable when the Pull test indicates normal postural control. It is hoped that the rapid identification of postural instability in PD may lead to increased awareness of the disease progression and fewer falls.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862742621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862742621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02927.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02927.x

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 718

EP - 721

JO - International Journal of Clinical Practice

JF - International Journal of Clinical Practice

SN - 1368-5031

IS - 7

ER -