Does blood flow accurately predict thrombosis or failure of hemodialysis synthetic grafts? A meta-analysis

W. D. Paulson, S. O. Ram, C. G. Birk, J. Work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of studies have reported that a single low blood flow (Qa) measurement in synthetic hemodialysis grafts predicts thrombosis or failure. In a meta-analysis of these studies, we computed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that evaluated the predictive accuracy of a Qa measurement. The ROC curves plotted sensitivity versus false-positive rate for predicting thrombosis or failure at different Qa thresholds. A perfect predictor has an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0, whereas a predictor with no discriminative ability has an AUC of 0.5. We identified studies through a literature search and included our own unpublished data. A random-effects model was used to combine the ROC curves from different studies. Of 19 identified studies, 12 were suitable for computing binormal ROC curves (6 predicted thrombosis; 6 predicted failure). The studies measured Qa and then observed outcome during periods of 1.5 to more than 6 months. The combined AUCs from these studies indicate Qa was a relatively poor predictor, with 0.70 ± 0.04 (range, 0.61 to 0.84) for thrombosis and 0.76 ± 0.07 (range, 0.62 to 0.90) for failure. The wide range of AUCs also shows there was much heterogeneity between studies. We conclude that a single Qa measurement does not appear to have enough accuracy to be a clinically useful predictor of graft thrombosis or failure. Serial Qa measurements and identification of factors that caused heterogeneity between studies may be needed to achieve sufficient accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)478-485
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Renal Dialysis
Meta-Analysis
Thrombosis
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Transplants

Keywords

  • Blood vessel prosthesis
  • Graft blood flow
  • Hemodialysis
  • Stenosis
  • Thrombosis
  • Vascular graff occlusion
  • Vascular patency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Does blood flow accurately predict thrombosis or failure of hemodialysis synthetic grafts? A meta-analysis. / Paulson, W. D.; Ram, S. O.; Birk, C. G.; Work, J.

In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.01.1999, p. 478-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02addcffb01946879f4f331f144c13b8,
title = "Does blood flow accurately predict thrombosis or failure of hemodialysis synthetic grafts? A meta-analysis",
abstract = "A number of studies have reported that a single low blood flow (Qa) measurement in synthetic hemodialysis grafts predicts thrombosis or failure. In a meta-analysis of these studies, we computed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that evaluated the predictive accuracy of a Qa measurement. The ROC curves plotted sensitivity versus false-positive rate for predicting thrombosis or failure at different Qa thresholds. A perfect predictor has an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0, whereas a predictor with no discriminative ability has an AUC of 0.5. We identified studies through a literature search and included our own unpublished data. A random-effects model was used to combine the ROC curves from different studies. Of 19 identified studies, 12 were suitable for computing binormal ROC curves (6 predicted thrombosis; 6 predicted failure). The studies measured Qa and then observed outcome during periods of 1.5 to more than 6 months. The combined AUCs from these studies indicate Qa was a relatively poor predictor, with 0.70 ± 0.04 (range, 0.61 to 0.84) for thrombosis and 0.76 ± 0.07 (range, 0.62 to 0.90) for failure. The wide range of AUCs also shows there was much heterogeneity between studies. We conclude that a single Qa measurement does not appear to have enough accuracy to be a clinically useful predictor of graft thrombosis or failure. Serial Qa measurements and identification of factors that caused heterogeneity between studies may be needed to achieve sufficient accuracy.",
keywords = "Blood vessel prosthesis, Graft blood flow, Hemodialysis, Stenosis, Thrombosis, Vascular graff occlusion, Vascular patency",
author = "Paulson, {W. D.} and Ram, {S. O.} and Birk, {C. G.} and J. Work",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70075-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "478--485",
journal = "American Journal of Kidney Diseases",
issn = "0272-6386",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does blood flow accurately predict thrombosis or failure of hemodialysis synthetic grafts? A meta-analysis

AU - Paulson, W. D.

AU - Ram, S. O.

AU - Birk, C. G.

AU - Work, J.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - A number of studies have reported that a single low blood flow (Qa) measurement in synthetic hemodialysis grafts predicts thrombosis or failure. In a meta-analysis of these studies, we computed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that evaluated the predictive accuracy of a Qa measurement. The ROC curves plotted sensitivity versus false-positive rate for predicting thrombosis or failure at different Qa thresholds. A perfect predictor has an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0, whereas a predictor with no discriminative ability has an AUC of 0.5. We identified studies through a literature search and included our own unpublished data. A random-effects model was used to combine the ROC curves from different studies. Of 19 identified studies, 12 were suitable for computing binormal ROC curves (6 predicted thrombosis; 6 predicted failure). The studies measured Qa and then observed outcome during periods of 1.5 to more than 6 months. The combined AUCs from these studies indicate Qa was a relatively poor predictor, with 0.70 ± 0.04 (range, 0.61 to 0.84) for thrombosis and 0.76 ± 0.07 (range, 0.62 to 0.90) for failure. The wide range of AUCs also shows there was much heterogeneity between studies. We conclude that a single Qa measurement does not appear to have enough accuracy to be a clinically useful predictor of graft thrombosis or failure. Serial Qa measurements and identification of factors that caused heterogeneity between studies may be needed to achieve sufficient accuracy.

AB - A number of studies have reported that a single low blood flow (Qa) measurement in synthetic hemodialysis grafts predicts thrombosis or failure. In a meta-analysis of these studies, we computed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that evaluated the predictive accuracy of a Qa measurement. The ROC curves plotted sensitivity versus false-positive rate for predicting thrombosis or failure at different Qa thresholds. A perfect predictor has an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0, whereas a predictor with no discriminative ability has an AUC of 0.5. We identified studies through a literature search and included our own unpublished data. A random-effects model was used to combine the ROC curves from different studies. Of 19 identified studies, 12 were suitable for computing binormal ROC curves (6 predicted thrombosis; 6 predicted failure). The studies measured Qa and then observed outcome during periods of 1.5 to more than 6 months. The combined AUCs from these studies indicate Qa was a relatively poor predictor, with 0.70 ± 0.04 (range, 0.61 to 0.84) for thrombosis and 0.76 ± 0.07 (range, 0.62 to 0.90) for failure. The wide range of AUCs also shows there was much heterogeneity between studies. We conclude that a single Qa measurement does not appear to have enough accuracy to be a clinically useful predictor of graft thrombosis or failure. Serial Qa measurements and identification of factors that caused heterogeneity between studies may be needed to achieve sufficient accuracy.

KW - Blood vessel prosthesis

KW - Graft blood flow

KW - Hemodialysis

KW - Stenosis

KW - Thrombosis

KW - Vascular graff occlusion

KW - Vascular patency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032832089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032832089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70075-2

DO - 10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70075-2

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 478

EP - 485

JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

SN - 0272-6386

IS - 3

ER -