Does motor cerebral dominance develop secondary to sensory dominance?

R. S. el-Mallakh, R. J. Wyatt, Stephen Warwick Looney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current research and theoretical frameworks for understanding motor dominance assume that motor dominance is primary. Various developmental clues, however, suggest that the maturation of proprioceptive sensory processing predates that of motor control. We hypothesized that the observed adult pattern of lateralized motor dominance may develop as a consequence of preexisting lateralized "sensory" or "proprioceptive dominance." To test whether motor preference could develop in response to sensory dominance, we investigated sighting eye dominance, eye lid winking, and handedness in 164 individuals. Subjects winked the nondominant eye significantly more frequently than the dominant eye and independently of their handedness, lending partial support to the idea that motor function can develop in response to sensory function. Specific investigation of the development of the proprioceptive system would be needed to evaluate whether lateralization of motor handedness develops as a consequence of "proprioceptive" lateralization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-652
Number of pages6
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cerebral Dominance
Functional Laterality
ocular Dominance
Blinking
Prednisolone
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Does motor cerebral dominance develop secondary to sensory dominance? / el-Mallakh, R. S.; Wyatt, R. J.; Looney, Stephen Warwick.

In: Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 76, No. 2, 01.01.1993, p. 647-652.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c31be07d10c4939a33a4f82a05c15d2,
title = "Does motor cerebral dominance develop secondary to sensory dominance?",
abstract = "Current research and theoretical frameworks for understanding motor dominance assume that motor dominance is primary. Various developmental clues, however, suggest that the maturation of proprioceptive sensory processing predates that of motor control. We hypothesized that the observed adult pattern of lateralized motor dominance may develop as a consequence of preexisting lateralized {"}sensory{"} or {"}proprioceptive dominance.{"} To test whether motor preference could develop in response to sensory dominance, we investigated sighting eye dominance, eye lid winking, and handedness in 164 individuals. Subjects winked the nondominant eye significantly more frequently than the dominant eye and independently of their handedness, lending partial support to the idea that motor function can develop in response to sensory function. Specific investigation of the development of the proprioceptive system would be needed to evaluate whether lateralization of motor handedness develops as a consequence of {"}proprioceptive{"} lateralization.",
author = "el-Mallakh, {R. S.} and Wyatt, {R. J.} and Looney, {Stephen Warwick}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.647",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "647--652",
journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",
issn = "0031-5125",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does motor cerebral dominance develop secondary to sensory dominance?

AU - el-Mallakh, R. S.

AU - Wyatt, R. J.

AU - Looney, Stephen Warwick

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Current research and theoretical frameworks for understanding motor dominance assume that motor dominance is primary. Various developmental clues, however, suggest that the maturation of proprioceptive sensory processing predates that of motor control. We hypothesized that the observed adult pattern of lateralized motor dominance may develop as a consequence of preexisting lateralized "sensory" or "proprioceptive dominance." To test whether motor preference could develop in response to sensory dominance, we investigated sighting eye dominance, eye lid winking, and handedness in 164 individuals. Subjects winked the nondominant eye significantly more frequently than the dominant eye and independently of their handedness, lending partial support to the idea that motor function can develop in response to sensory function. Specific investigation of the development of the proprioceptive system would be needed to evaluate whether lateralization of motor handedness develops as a consequence of "proprioceptive" lateralization.

AB - Current research and theoretical frameworks for understanding motor dominance assume that motor dominance is primary. Various developmental clues, however, suggest that the maturation of proprioceptive sensory processing predates that of motor control. We hypothesized that the observed adult pattern of lateralized motor dominance may develop as a consequence of preexisting lateralized "sensory" or "proprioceptive dominance." To test whether motor preference could develop in response to sensory dominance, we investigated sighting eye dominance, eye lid winking, and handedness in 164 individuals. Subjects winked the nondominant eye significantly more frequently than the dominant eye and independently of their handedness, lending partial support to the idea that motor function can develop in response to sensory function. Specific investigation of the development of the proprioceptive system would be needed to evaluate whether lateralization of motor handedness develops as a consequence of "proprioceptive" lateralization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027583587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027583587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.647

DO - 10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.647

M3 - Article

C2 - 8483682

AN - SCOPUS:0027583587

VL - 76

SP - 647

EP - 652

JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

SN - 0031-5125

IS - 2

ER -