Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery

JianYue Jin, Fang Fang Yin, Samuel Ryu, Munther Ajlouni, Ho Kim Jae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper systematically studied the dosimetric difference between a 3 mm micro multileaf collimator (MLC), a 5 mm MLC, and a 10 mm MLC for stereotactic radiosurgery using the Brainscan treatment planning system. Thirty-four cases treated with the dynamic conformal arcs technique and 20 cases treated with the intensity modulated radiosurgery/fractionated radiotherapy (IMRS/ IMRT) technique were retrospectively studied. The conformity index, the percentage target coverage, and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) for organs-at-risk (OARs) were used for dosimetric analysis and comparison for different treatment techniques, target volumes, and treatment sites. For the dynamic conformal arcs technique, there were statistically significant differences in the conformity indices between different leaf-width MLCs. The ratio of the conformity indices between different MLCs depended on the target volume. The average conformity index ratios between the 5 mm MLC and the 3 mm MLC were 1.37±0.09, 1.12±0.04, 1.08±0.02 and 1.04±0.01, respectively, for patients with the target volume (V) in groups: (1) V<1 cm3, (2) 1 cm3 <V< 8 cm3, (3) 8 cm3<V<27 cm3, and (4) V>27 CC. The average conformity index ratios between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs were 2.00±0.33, 1.45±0.09, 1.28±0.09, and 1.18±0.05 for patients in these four volume groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the target coverage among different MLCs. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the average conformity index and target coverage ratios were 1.01±0.05 and 1.00±0.02, respectively, between the 5 and 3 mm MLCs, and were 1.04±0.07 and 0.97±0.02, respectively, between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs. The 3 mm MLC showed slightly better overall OAR DVHs than the 5 and 10 mm MLCs, especially for the cranial site with small-volume OARs defined. The results suggest that for the dynamic conformal arcs technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC provides better dose conformity than the wider leaf-width MLCs. This advantage decreases when the target volume increases. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC could have better sparing of small OARs than the wider leaf-width MLC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-411
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Organs at Risk
Radiosurgery
Therapeutics
Radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery. / Jin, JianYue; Yin, Fang Fang; Ryu, Samuel; Ajlouni, Munther; Jae, Ho Kim.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.01.2005, p. 405-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jin, JianYue ; Yin, Fang Fang ; Ryu, Samuel ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Jae, Ho Kim. / Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery. In: Medical Physics. 2005 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 405-411.
@article{e346aed2c5dc46bfbf3c66565af22fd9,
title = "Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery",
abstract = "This paper systematically studied the dosimetric difference between a 3 mm micro multileaf collimator (MLC), a 5 mm MLC, and a 10 mm MLC for stereotactic radiosurgery using the Brainscan treatment planning system. Thirty-four cases treated with the dynamic conformal arcs technique and 20 cases treated with the intensity modulated radiosurgery/fractionated radiotherapy (IMRS/ IMRT) technique were retrospectively studied. The conformity index, the percentage target coverage, and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) for organs-at-risk (OARs) were used for dosimetric analysis and comparison for different treatment techniques, target volumes, and treatment sites. For the dynamic conformal arcs technique, there were statistically significant differences in the conformity indices between different leaf-width MLCs. The ratio of the conformity indices between different MLCs depended on the target volume. The average conformity index ratios between the 5 mm MLC and the 3 mm MLC were 1.37±0.09, 1.12±0.04, 1.08±0.02 and 1.04±0.01, respectively, for patients with the target volume (V) in groups: (1) V<1 cm3, (2) 1 cm3 <V< 8 cm3, (3) 8 cm3<V<27 cm3, and (4) V>27 CC. The average conformity index ratios between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs were 2.00±0.33, 1.45±0.09, 1.28±0.09, and 1.18±0.05 for patients in these four volume groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the target coverage among different MLCs. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the average conformity index and target coverage ratios were 1.01±0.05 and 1.00±0.02, respectively, between the 5 and 3 mm MLCs, and were 1.04±0.07 and 0.97±0.02, respectively, between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs. The 3 mm MLC showed slightly better overall OAR DVHs than the 5 and 10 mm MLCs, especially for the cranial site with small-volume OARs defined. The results suggest that for the dynamic conformal arcs technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC provides better dose conformity than the wider leaf-width MLCs. This advantage decreases when the target volume increases. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC could have better sparing of small OARs than the wider leaf-width MLC.",
author = "JianYue Jin and Yin, {Fang Fang} and Samuel Ryu and Munther Ajlouni and Jae, {Ho Kim}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.1842911",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "405--411",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery

AU - Jin, JianYue

AU - Yin, Fang Fang

AU - Ryu, Samuel

AU - Ajlouni, Munther

AU - Jae, Ho Kim

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - This paper systematically studied the dosimetric difference between a 3 mm micro multileaf collimator (MLC), a 5 mm MLC, and a 10 mm MLC for stereotactic radiosurgery using the Brainscan treatment planning system. Thirty-four cases treated with the dynamic conformal arcs technique and 20 cases treated with the intensity modulated radiosurgery/fractionated radiotherapy (IMRS/ IMRT) technique were retrospectively studied. The conformity index, the percentage target coverage, and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) for organs-at-risk (OARs) were used for dosimetric analysis and comparison for different treatment techniques, target volumes, and treatment sites. For the dynamic conformal arcs technique, there were statistically significant differences in the conformity indices between different leaf-width MLCs. The ratio of the conformity indices between different MLCs depended on the target volume. The average conformity index ratios between the 5 mm MLC and the 3 mm MLC were 1.37±0.09, 1.12±0.04, 1.08±0.02 and 1.04±0.01, respectively, for patients with the target volume (V) in groups: (1) V<1 cm3, (2) 1 cm3 <V< 8 cm3, (3) 8 cm3<V<27 cm3, and (4) V>27 CC. The average conformity index ratios between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs were 2.00±0.33, 1.45±0.09, 1.28±0.09, and 1.18±0.05 for patients in these four volume groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the target coverage among different MLCs. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the average conformity index and target coverage ratios were 1.01±0.05 and 1.00±0.02, respectively, between the 5 and 3 mm MLCs, and were 1.04±0.07 and 0.97±0.02, respectively, between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs. The 3 mm MLC showed slightly better overall OAR DVHs than the 5 and 10 mm MLCs, especially for the cranial site with small-volume OARs defined. The results suggest that for the dynamic conformal arcs technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC provides better dose conformity than the wider leaf-width MLCs. This advantage decreases when the target volume increases. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC could have better sparing of small OARs than the wider leaf-width MLC.

AB - This paper systematically studied the dosimetric difference between a 3 mm micro multileaf collimator (MLC), a 5 mm MLC, and a 10 mm MLC for stereotactic radiosurgery using the Brainscan treatment planning system. Thirty-four cases treated with the dynamic conformal arcs technique and 20 cases treated with the intensity modulated radiosurgery/fractionated radiotherapy (IMRS/ IMRT) technique were retrospectively studied. The conformity index, the percentage target coverage, and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) for organs-at-risk (OARs) were used for dosimetric analysis and comparison for different treatment techniques, target volumes, and treatment sites. For the dynamic conformal arcs technique, there were statistically significant differences in the conformity indices between different leaf-width MLCs. The ratio of the conformity indices between different MLCs depended on the target volume. The average conformity index ratios between the 5 mm MLC and the 3 mm MLC were 1.37±0.09, 1.12±0.04, 1.08±0.02 and 1.04±0.01, respectively, for patients with the target volume (V) in groups: (1) V<1 cm3, (2) 1 cm3 <V< 8 cm3, (3) 8 cm3<V<27 cm3, and (4) V>27 CC. The average conformity index ratios between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs were 2.00±0.33, 1.45±0.09, 1.28±0.09, and 1.18±0.05 for patients in these four volume groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the target coverage among different MLCs. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the average conformity index and target coverage ratios were 1.01±0.05 and 1.00±0.02, respectively, between the 5 and 3 mm MLCs, and were 1.04±0.07 and 0.97±0.02, respectively, between the 10 and 3 mm MLCs. The 3 mm MLC showed slightly better overall OAR DVHs than the 5 and 10 mm MLCs, especially for the cranial site with small-volume OARs defined. The results suggest that for the dynamic conformal arcs technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC provides better dose conformity than the wider leaf-width MLCs. This advantage decreases when the target volume increases. For the IMRS/IMRT technique, the narrower leaf-width MLC could have better sparing of small OARs than the wider leaf-width MLC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14644434363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14644434363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1842911

DO - 10.1118/1.1842911

M3 - Article

C2 - 15789586

AN - SCOPUS:14644434363

VL - 32

SP - 405

EP - 411

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 2

ER -