Drg reimbursement for trauma

The demise of the trauma center (the use of iss grouping as an early predictor of total hospital cost)

C. William Schwab, Gary Young, Ian Civil, Steven E. Ross, Raymond Talucci, Leroy Rosenberg, Khaleel Shaikh, Keith F. O'Malley, Rudolph C. Camishion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All institutional reimbursement for inpatient care in the State of New Jersey is administered by the DRG methodology (Prospective Payment System). This system is essentially identical to federal Medicare. In 1983 our hospital was designated the Level I trauma center for southern New Jersey (population, 2.6 million). Prehospital triage guidelines based on anatomic injury were implemented, and, as a result, an annual 30% increase in severe trauma cases (ISS > 16) was realized. In late 1984 serious financial shortfalls were noticed, especially in the higher ISS cases. A 1-year study (1985) of all patients admitted through the Trauma Center to an intensive care unit was completed (523 patients; mean ISS, 15.16; ISS > 16, 37.8%). All patients were stratified to one of five ISS groups (A: ISS 1-8; B: ISS 9-15; C: ISS 16-24; D: ISS 25- 40; E: ISS > 40). Average cost, reimbursement, ISS, LOS, and mortality were reviewed for the entire aggregate and each severity group. The system of ISS grouping was an accurate method of cost analysis, and prospectively, ISS grouping allowed prediction of length of stay and total hospital cost. In addition, these data allowed early fiscal management decisions and resource allocation. As a reimbursement system, DRG falls short of the cost of care for all ISS levels and groups. As severity of injury rose, costs increased in a linear manner, but reimbursement did not, resulting in a substantial financial loss. The net loss to the hospital in 1 year was $1.86 million. Based on this experience, DRG’s are not capable of supporting trauma care, and if adopted by other state agencies or third party payors, would end the concept of the trauma center.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)939-946
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Costs
Trauma Centers
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Prospective Payment System
Health Insurance Reimbursement
Resource Allocation
Triage
Medicare
Intensive Care Units
Inpatients
Length of Stay
Guidelines
Mortality
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Drg reimbursement for trauma : The demise of the trauma center (the use of iss grouping as an early predictor of total hospital cost). / Schwab, C. William; Young, Gary; Civil, Ian; Ross, Steven E.; Talucci, Raymond; Rosenberg, Leroy; Shaikh, Khaleel; O'Malley, Keith F.; Camishion, Rudolph C.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 28, No. 7, 01.01.1988, p. 939-946.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwab, C. William ; Young, Gary ; Civil, Ian ; Ross, Steven E. ; Talucci, Raymond ; Rosenberg, Leroy ; Shaikh, Khaleel ; O'Malley, Keith F. ; Camishion, Rudolph C. / Drg reimbursement for trauma : The demise of the trauma center (the use of iss grouping as an early predictor of total hospital cost). In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1988 ; Vol. 28, No. 7. pp. 939-946.
@article{d123bef52f1a413c83e7c64532513538,
title = "Drg reimbursement for trauma: The demise of the trauma center (the use of iss grouping as an early predictor of total hospital cost)",
abstract = "All institutional reimbursement for inpatient care in the State of New Jersey is administered by the DRG methodology (Prospective Payment System). This system is essentially identical to federal Medicare. In 1983 our hospital was designated the Level I trauma center for southern New Jersey (population, 2.6 million). Prehospital triage guidelines based on anatomic injury were implemented, and, as a result, an annual 30{\%} increase in severe trauma cases (ISS > 16) was realized. In late 1984 serious financial shortfalls were noticed, especially in the higher ISS cases. A 1-year study (1985) of all patients admitted through the Trauma Center to an intensive care unit was completed (523 patients; mean ISS, 15.16; ISS > 16, 37.8{\%}). All patients were stratified to one of five ISS groups (A: ISS 1-8; B: ISS 9-15; C: ISS 16-24; D: ISS 25- 40; E: ISS > 40). Average cost, reimbursement, ISS, LOS, and mortality were reviewed for the entire aggregate and each severity group. The system of ISS grouping was an accurate method of cost analysis, and prospectively, ISS grouping allowed prediction of length of stay and total hospital cost. In addition, these data allowed early fiscal management decisions and resource allocation. As a reimbursement system, DRG falls short of the cost of care for all ISS levels and groups. As severity of injury rose, costs increased in a linear manner, but reimbursement did not, resulting in a substantial financial loss. The net loss to the hospital in 1 year was $1.86 million. Based on this experience, DRG’s are not capable of supporting trauma care, and if adopted by other state agencies or third party payors, would end the concept of the trauma center.",
author = "Schwab, {C. William} and Gary Young and Ian Civil and Ross, {Steven E.} and Raymond Talucci and Leroy Rosenberg and Khaleel Shaikh and O'Malley, {Keith F.} and Camishion, {Rudolph C.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-198807000-00006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "939--946",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drg reimbursement for trauma

T2 - The demise of the trauma center (the use of iss grouping as an early predictor of total hospital cost)

AU - Schwab, C. William

AU - Young, Gary

AU - Civil, Ian

AU - Ross, Steven E.

AU - Talucci, Raymond

AU - Rosenberg, Leroy

AU - Shaikh, Khaleel

AU - O'Malley, Keith F.

AU - Camishion, Rudolph C.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - All institutional reimbursement for inpatient care in the State of New Jersey is administered by the DRG methodology (Prospective Payment System). This system is essentially identical to federal Medicare. In 1983 our hospital was designated the Level I trauma center for southern New Jersey (population, 2.6 million). Prehospital triage guidelines based on anatomic injury were implemented, and, as a result, an annual 30% increase in severe trauma cases (ISS > 16) was realized. In late 1984 serious financial shortfalls were noticed, especially in the higher ISS cases. A 1-year study (1985) of all patients admitted through the Trauma Center to an intensive care unit was completed (523 patients; mean ISS, 15.16; ISS > 16, 37.8%). All patients were stratified to one of five ISS groups (A: ISS 1-8; B: ISS 9-15; C: ISS 16-24; D: ISS 25- 40; E: ISS > 40). Average cost, reimbursement, ISS, LOS, and mortality were reviewed for the entire aggregate and each severity group. The system of ISS grouping was an accurate method of cost analysis, and prospectively, ISS grouping allowed prediction of length of stay and total hospital cost. In addition, these data allowed early fiscal management decisions and resource allocation. As a reimbursement system, DRG falls short of the cost of care for all ISS levels and groups. As severity of injury rose, costs increased in a linear manner, but reimbursement did not, resulting in a substantial financial loss. The net loss to the hospital in 1 year was $1.86 million. Based on this experience, DRG’s are not capable of supporting trauma care, and if adopted by other state agencies or third party payors, would end the concept of the trauma center.

AB - All institutional reimbursement for inpatient care in the State of New Jersey is administered by the DRG methodology (Prospective Payment System). This system is essentially identical to federal Medicare. In 1983 our hospital was designated the Level I trauma center for southern New Jersey (population, 2.6 million). Prehospital triage guidelines based on anatomic injury were implemented, and, as a result, an annual 30% increase in severe trauma cases (ISS > 16) was realized. In late 1984 serious financial shortfalls were noticed, especially in the higher ISS cases. A 1-year study (1985) of all patients admitted through the Trauma Center to an intensive care unit was completed (523 patients; mean ISS, 15.16; ISS > 16, 37.8%). All patients were stratified to one of five ISS groups (A: ISS 1-8; B: ISS 9-15; C: ISS 16-24; D: ISS 25- 40; E: ISS > 40). Average cost, reimbursement, ISS, LOS, and mortality were reviewed for the entire aggregate and each severity group. The system of ISS grouping was an accurate method of cost analysis, and prospectively, ISS grouping allowed prediction of length of stay and total hospital cost. In addition, these data allowed early fiscal management decisions and resource allocation. As a reimbursement system, DRG falls short of the cost of care for all ISS levels and groups. As severity of injury rose, costs increased in a linear manner, but reimbursement did not, resulting in a substantial financial loss. The net loss to the hospital in 1 year was $1.86 million. Based on this experience, DRG’s are not capable of supporting trauma care, and if adopted by other state agencies or third party payors, would end the concept of the trauma center.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023705875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023705875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-198807000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00005373-198807000-00006

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 939

EP - 946

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 7

ER -