Drug screening and changing marijuana policy: Validation of new single question drug screening tools

J. Paul Seale, J Aaron Johnson, Nicholas Cline, Christopher Buchanan, Chris Kiker, Lindsey Cochran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Illicit drug use is common in U.S. medical settings. A validated Single Drug Screening Question (SDSQ) containing the word “illegal” is widely used. As marijuana policies change, the present wording may not perform as expected in states legalizing use. This study compares the performance of the validated SDSQ with three different SDSQ wordings. Methods: Patients, 18 years and older, presenting to a U.S. hospital emergency department were asked to complete a survey containing the existing SDSQ, three new SDSQ versions without the word “illegal,” and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Patients were also encouraged to provide a sample for saliva drug testing. Results: Of 297 eligible patients, 200 (67.3%) completed the survey and 141 (70.5% of interview participants) completed saliva testing. Overlapping confidence intervals on the Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis confirmed that sensitivities of all SDSQs were statistically similar for detecting self-reported drug use (65–71%). Combining questionnaire and saliva testing increased drug use detection by 2% and resulted in lower SDSQ sensitivity (58–67%). Specificities were 99–100%. The SDSQ with the highest sensitivity was: “In the last twelve months, did you smoke pot (marijuana), use another street drug, or use a prescription medication “recreationally” (just for the feeling, or using more than prescribed)?” Conclusions: All four SDSQs demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and high specificity. Removing the term ‘illegal’ does not result in higher, or lower, reported drug use, though results could vary in states with legalized marijuana. Future research should replicate this study in one or more of these states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-109
Number of pages6
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume193
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Preclinical Drug Evaluations
Cannabis
Screening
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Saliva
Street Drugs
Interviews
Hospital Departments
Testing
Smoke
Area Under Curve
Prescriptions
Hospital Emergency Service
Emotions
Confidence Intervals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Brief screening
  • Drug screening
  • Drug use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Drug screening and changing marijuana policy : Validation of new single question drug screening tools. / Seale, J. Paul; Johnson, J Aaron; Cline, Nicholas; Buchanan, Christopher; Kiker, Chris; Cochran, Lindsey.

In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 193, 01.12.2018, p. 104-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seale, J. Paul ; Johnson, J Aaron ; Cline, Nicholas ; Buchanan, Christopher ; Kiker, Chris ; Cochran, Lindsey. / Drug screening and changing marijuana policy : Validation of new single question drug screening tools. In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2018 ; Vol. 193. pp. 104-109.
@article{d8d6b67a6d4e406cbeb0e8a0029fcd75,
title = "Drug screening and changing marijuana policy: Validation of new single question drug screening tools",
abstract = "Background: Illicit drug use is common in U.S. medical settings. A validated Single Drug Screening Question (SDSQ) containing the word “illegal” is widely used. As marijuana policies change, the present wording may not perform as expected in states legalizing use. This study compares the performance of the validated SDSQ with three different SDSQ wordings. Methods: Patients, 18 years and older, presenting to a U.S. hospital emergency department were asked to complete a survey containing the existing SDSQ, three new SDSQ versions without the word “illegal,” and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Patients were also encouraged to provide a sample for saliva drug testing. Results: Of 297 eligible patients, 200 (67.3{\%}) completed the survey and 141 (70.5{\%} of interview participants) completed saliva testing. Overlapping confidence intervals on the Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis confirmed that sensitivities of all SDSQs were statistically similar for detecting self-reported drug use (65–71{\%}). Combining questionnaire and saliva testing increased drug use detection by 2{\%} and resulted in lower SDSQ sensitivity (58–67{\%}). Specificities were 99–100{\%}. The SDSQ with the highest sensitivity was: “In the last twelve months, did you smoke pot (marijuana), use another street drug, or use a prescription medication “recreationally” (just for the feeling, or using more than prescribed)?” Conclusions: All four SDSQs demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and high specificity. Removing the term ‘illegal’ does not result in higher, or lower, reported drug use, though results could vary in states with legalized marijuana. Future research should replicate this study in one or more of these states.",
keywords = "Brief screening, Drug screening, Drug use",
author = "Seale, {J. Paul} and Johnson, {J Aaron} and Nicholas Cline and Christopher Buchanan and Chris Kiker and Lindsey Cochran",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "104--109",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug screening and changing marijuana policy

T2 - Validation of new single question drug screening tools

AU - Seale, J. Paul

AU - Johnson, J Aaron

AU - Cline, Nicholas

AU - Buchanan, Christopher

AU - Kiker, Chris

AU - Cochran, Lindsey

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Background: Illicit drug use is common in U.S. medical settings. A validated Single Drug Screening Question (SDSQ) containing the word “illegal” is widely used. As marijuana policies change, the present wording may not perform as expected in states legalizing use. This study compares the performance of the validated SDSQ with three different SDSQ wordings. Methods: Patients, 18 years and older, presenting to a U.S. hospital emergency department were asked to complete a survey containing the existing SDSQ, three new SDSQ versions without the word “illegal,” and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Patients were also encouraged to provide a sample for saliva drug testing. Results: Of 297 eligible patients, 200 (67.3%) completed the survey and 141 (70.5% of interview participants) completed saliva testing. Overlapping confidence intervals on the Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis confirmed that sensitivities of all SDSQs were statistically similar for detecting self-reported drug use (65–71%). Combining questionnaire and saliva testing increased drug use detection by 2% and resulted in lower SDSQ sensitivity (58–67%). Specificities were 99–100%. The SDSQ with the highest sensitivity was: “In the last twelve months, did you smoke pot (marijuana), use another street drug, or use a prescription medication “recreationally” (just for the feeling, or using more than prescribed)?” Conclusions: All four SDSQs demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and high specificity. Removing the term ‘illegal’ does not result in higher, or lower, reported drug use, though results could vary in states with legalized marijuana. Future research should replicate this study in one or more of these states.

AB - Background: Illicit drug use is common in U.S. medical settings. A validated Single Drug Screening Question (SDSQ) containing the word “illegal” is widely used. As marijuana policies change, the present wording may not perform as expected in states legalizing use. This study compares the performance of the validated SDSQ with three different SDSQ wordings. Methods: Patients, 18 years and older, presenting to a U.S. hospital emergency department were asked to complete a survey containing the existing SDSQ, three new SDSQ versions without the word “illegal,” and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Patients were also encouraged to provide a sample for saliva drug testing. Results: Of 297 eligible patients, 200 (67.3%) completed the survey and 141 (70.5% of interview participants) completed saliva testing. Overlapping confidence intervals on the Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis confirmed that sensitivities of all SDSQs were statistically similar for detecting self-reported drug use (65–71%). Combining questionnaire and saliva testing increased drug use detection by 2% and resulted in lower SDSQ sensitivity (58–67%). Specificities were 99–100%. The SDSQ with the highest sensitivity was: “In the last twelve months, did you smoke pot (marijuana), use another street drug, or use a prescription medication “recreationally” (just for the feeling, or using more than prescribed)?” Conclusions: All four SDSQs demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and high specificity. Removing the term ‘illegal’ does not result in higher, or lower, reported drug use, though results could vary in states with legalized marijuana. Future research should replicate this study in one or more of these states.

KW - Brief screening

KW - Drug screening

KW - Drug use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055132089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055132089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.030

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 30352333

AN - SCOPUS:85055132089

VL - 193

SP - 104

EP - 109

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

ER -