Effect of Curing Light Barriers and Light Types on Radiant Exposure and Composite Conversion

Rhoda Joyner Sword, Uyen Ngoc Do, Jonathan Hu Chang, Frederick Rueggeberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Previous research investigated the effects of curing tip barriers on light output and composite properties, but no study has measured the effect of a wide variety of barriers and curing light types on delivered radiant exposure and the resulting composite cure 2 mm below the radiated surface. Materials and Methods Six barrier materials and six curing light types were tested. Spectroradiometry was used to measure irradiance with and without barriers for each light type, and radiant exposure values were determined for a commercial camphorquinone-based dental composite material. Composite monomer conversion was measured at 10 minutes following exposure for each light type/barrier condition (N = 5) using infrared spectroscopy. Results were subjected to one-way analyses of variance for radiant exposure and conversion among barrier types within a given curing light: preset alpha 0.05. Results All barriers significantly reduced radiant exposure compared with the uncovered tip, but the use of the two polywave LEDs covered with a latex-based barrier demonstrated significantly lower conversion values. Conclusions Although light-curing barriers reduce radiant exposure to a restorative material over a recommended exposure, this reduction is not sufficient to cause significant reduction in composite cure, except when using a latex-based barrier and a polywave LED curing light. Clinical Significance Clinicians need to be aware of the possible interaction between curing light barriers and curing light type in order to optimally photocure restorative materials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-42
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Light
Latex
Dental Materials
Spectrum Analysis
Analysis of Variance
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effect of Curing Light Barriers and Light Types on Radiant Exposure and Composite Conversion. / Sword, Rhoda Joyner; Do, Uyen Ngoc; Chang, Jonathan Hu; Rueggeberg, Frederick.

In: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 29-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e4874cc0cd7c4ace8bb88d9eb3211f2f,
title = "Effect of Curing Light Barriers and Light Types on Radiant Exposure and Composite Conversion",
abstract = "Purpose Previous research investigated the effects of curing tip barriers on light output and composite properties, but no study has measured the effect of a wide variety of barriers and curing light types on delivered radiant exposure and the resulting composite cure 2 mm below the radiated surface. Materials and Methods Six barrier materials and six curing light types were tested. Spectroradiometry was used to measure irradiance with and without barriers for each light type, and radiant exposure values were determined for a commercial camphorquinone-based dental composite material. Composite monomer conversion was measured at 10 minutes following exposure for each light type/barrier condition (N = 5) using infrared spectroscopy. Results were subjected to one-way analyses of variance for radiant exposure and conversion among barrier types within a given curing light: preset alpha 0.05. Results All barriers significantly reduced radiant exposure compared with the uncovered tip, but the use of the two polywave LEDs covered with a latex-based barrier demonstrated significantly lower conversion values. Conclusions Although light-curing barriers reduce radiant exposure to a restorative material over a recommended exposure, this reduction is not sufficient to cause significant reduction in composite cure, except when using a latex-based barrier and a polywave LED curing light. Clinical Significance Clinicians need to be aware of the possible interaction between curing light barriers and curing light type in order to optimally photocure restorative materials.",
author = "Sword, {Rhoda Joyner} and Do, {Uyen Ngoc} and Chang, {Jonathan Hu} and Frederick Rueggeberg",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jerd.12173",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "29--42",
journal = "Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry",
issn = "1496-4155",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Curing Light Barriers and Light Types on Radiant Exposure and Composite Conversion

AU - Sword, Rhoda Joyner

AU - Do, Uyen Ngoc

AU - Chang, Jonathan Hu

AU - Rueggeberg, Frederick

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose Previous research investigated the effects of curing tip barriers on light output and composite properties, but no study has measured the effect of a wide variety of barriers and curing light types on delivered radiant exposure and the resulting composite cure 2 mm below the radiated surface. Materials and Methods Six barrier materials and six curing light types were tested. Spectroradiometry was used to measure irradiance with and without barriers for each light type, and radiant exposure values were determined for a commercial camphorquinone-based dental composite material. Composite monomer conversion was measured at 10 minutes following exposure for each light type/barrier condition (N = 5) using infrared spectroscopy. Results were subjected to one-way analyses of variance for radiant exposure and conversion among barrier types within a given curing light: preset alpha 0.05. Results All barriers significantly reduced radiant exposure compared with the uncovered tip, but the use of the two polywave LEDs covered with a latex-based barrier demonstrated significantly lower conversion values. Conclusions Although light-curing barriers reduce radiant exposure to a restorative material over a recommended exposure, this reduction is not sufficient to cause significant reduction in composite cure, except when using a latex-based barrier and a polywave LED curing light. Clinical Significance Clinicians need to be aware of the possible interaction between curing light barriers and curing light type in order to optimally photocure restorative materials.

AB - Purpose Previous research investigated the effects of curing tip barriers on light output and composite properties, but no study has measured the effect of a wide variety of barriers and curing light types on delivered radiant exposure and the resulting composite cure 2 mm below the radiated surface. Materials and Methods Six barrier materials and six curing light types were tested. Spectroradiometry was used to measure irradiance with and without barriers for each light type, and radiant exposure values were determined for a commercial camphorquinone-based dental composite material. Composite monomer conversion was measured at 10 minutes following exposure for each light type/barrier condition (N = 5) using infrared spectroscopy. Results were subjected to one-way analyses of variance for radiant exposure and conversion among barrier types within a given curing light: preset alpha 0.05. Results All barriers significantly reduced radiant exposure compared with the uncovered tip, but the use of the two polywave LEDs covered with a latex-based barrier demonstrated significantly lower conversion values. Conclusions Although light-curing barriers reduce radiant exposure to a restorative material over a recommended exposure, this reduction is not sufficient to cause significant reduction in composite cure, except when using a latex-based barrier and a polywave LED curing light. Clinical Significance Clinicians need to be aware of the possible interaction between curing light barriers and curing light type in order to optimally photocure restorative materials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956963699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956963699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jerd.12173

DO - 10.1111/jerd.12173

M3 - Article

C2 - 26177387

AN - SCOPUS:84956963699

VL - 28

SP - 29

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

JF - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

SN - 1496-4155

IS - 1

ER -