Effect of ECT treatment number on the ictal EEG

Andrew D. Krystal, Richard D. Weiner, C. Edward Coffey, W. Vaughn McCall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that attributes of the ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) may be clinically useful for estimating the extent to which the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) stimulus exceeds the seizure threshold (relative stimulus intensity). Such a tool could allow a practitioner, who chose, on the basis of expected therapeutic response and side effect rates, to implement stimulus dosing to maintain relative stimulus intensity over the treatment course, despite the uncertain rise in seizure threshold that occurs. One potential confounding factor is a possible systematic change in the ictal EEG over the treatment course that is not due to changes in seizure threshold. We explored the effect of treatment number by comparing ictal EEG data obtained at treatments across the ECT course that were delivered at the identical relative stimulus intensity. We found that the ictal EEG at treatment 1 was characterized by a greater mid-ictal amplitude and post-ictal suppression (trend) than subsequent treatments for barely suprathreshold unilateral ECT, but not for barely suprathreshold bilateral or moderately suprathreshold unilateral ECT, and that this change may affect therapeutic effectiveness. These findings suggest the importance of treatment-number effects for the clinical application of the ictal EEG and point to possible physiological differences between unilateral and bilateral ECT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-189
Number of pages11
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 17 1996

Fingerprint

Electroconvulsive Therapy
Electroencephalography
Stroke
Seizures
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Affective disorder
  • Electroconvulsive therapy
  • Electroencephalogram
  • Seizure threshold

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Effect of ECT treatment number on the ictal EEG. / Krystal, Andrew D.; Weiner, Richard D.; Coffey, C. Edward; McCall, W. Vaughn.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 62, No. 2, 17.05.1996, p. 179-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krystal, Andrew D. ; Weiner, Richard D. ; Coffey, C. Edward ; McCall, W. Vaughn. / Effect of ECT treatment number on the ictal EEG. In: Psychiatry Research. 1996 ; Vol. 62, No. 2. pp. 179-189.
@article{93e2427d351143e0aa23c0bb6f68fb42,
title = "Effect of ECT treatment number on the ictal EEG",
abstract = "Recent evidence suggests that attributes of the ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) may be clinically useful for estimating the extent to which the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) stimulus exceeds the seizure threshold (relative stimulus intensity). Such a tool could allow a practitioner, who chose, on the basis of expected therapeutic response and side effect rates, to implement stimulus dosing to maintain relative stimulus intensity over the treatment course, despite the uncertain rise in seizure threshold that occurs. One potential confounding factor is a possible systematic change in the ictal EEG over the treatment course that is not due to changes in seizure threshold. We explored the effect of treatment number by comparing ictal EEG data obtained at treatments across the ECT course that were delivered at the identical relative stimulus intensity. We found that the ictal EEG at treatment 1 was characterized by a greater mid-ictal amplitude and post-ictal suppression (trend) than subsequent treatments for barely suprathreshold unilateral ECT, but not for barely suprathreshold bilateral or moderately suprathreshold unilateral ECT, and that this change may affect therapeutic effectiveness. These findings suggest the importance of treatment-number effects for the clinical application of the ictal EEG and point to possible physiological differences between unilateral and bilateral ECT.",
keywords = "Affective disorder, Electroconvulsive therapy, Electroencephalogram, Seizure threshold",
author = "Krystal, {Andrew D.} and Weiner, {Richard D.} and Coffey, {C. Edward} and McCall, {W. Vaughn}",
year = "1996",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1016/0165-1781(96)02844-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "179--189",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of ECT treatment number on the ictal EEG

AU - Krystal, Andrew D.

AU - Weiner, Richard D.

AU - Coffey, C. Edward

AU - McCall, W. Vaughn

PY - 1996/5/17

Y1 - 1996/5/17

N2 - Recent evidence suggests that attributes of the ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) may be clinically useful for estimating the extent to which the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) stimulus exceeds the seizure threshold (relative stimulus intensity). Such a tool could allow a practitioner, who chose, on the basis of expected therapeutic response and side effect rates, to implement stimulus dosing to maintain relative stimulus intensity over the treatment course, despite the uncertain rise in seizure threshold that occurs. One potential confounding factor is a possible systematic change in the ictal EEG over the treatment course that is not due to changes in seizure threshold. We explored the effect of treatment number by comparing ictal EEG data obtained at treatments across the ECT course that were delivered at the identical relative stimulus intensity. We found that the ictal EEG at treatment 1 was characterized by a greater mid-ictal amplitude and post-ictal suppression (trend) than subsequent treatments for barely suprathreshold unilateral ECT, but not for barely suprathreshold bilateral or moderately suprathreshold unilateral ECT, and that this change may affect therapeutic effectiveness. These findings suggest the importance of treatment-number effects for the clinical application of the ictal EEG and point to possible physiological differences between unilateral and bilateral ECT.

AB - Recent evidence suggests that attributes of the ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) may be clinically useful for estimating the extent to which the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) stimulus exceeds the seizure threshold (relative stimulus intensity). Such a tool could allow a practitioner, who chose, on the basis of expected therapeutic response and side effect rates, to implement stimulus dosing to maintain relative stimulus intensity over the treatment course, despite the uncertain rise in seizure threshold that occurs. One potential confounding factor is a possible systematic change in the ictal EEG over the treatment course that is not due to changes in seizure threshold. We explored the effect of treatment number by comparing ictal EEG data obtained at treatments across the ECT course that were delivered at the identical relative stimulus intensity. We found that the ictal EEG at treatment 1 was characterized by a greater mid-ictal amplitude and post-ictal suppression (trend) than subsequent treatments for barely suprathreshold unilateral ECT, but not for barely suprathreshold bilateral or moderately suprathreshold unilateral ECT, and that this change may affect therapeutic effectiveness. These findings suggest the importance of treatment-number effects for the clinical application of the ictal EEG and point to possible physiological differences between unilateral and bilateral ECT.

KW - Affective disorder

KW - Electroconvulsive therapy

KW - Electroencephalogram

KW - Seizure threshold

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029946689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029946689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02844-2

DO - 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02844-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 8771615

AN - SCOPUS:0029946689

VL - 62

SP - 179

EP - 189

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 2

ER -