TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of matrix metalloproteinase-inhibiting solutions and aging methods on dentin bond strength
AU - Perote, Letícia C.C.Costa
AU - Kamozaki, Maria Beatriz Beber
AU - Gutierrez, Natália C.
AU - Tay, Franklin R.
AU - Pucci, Cesar R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Quintessenz.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Purpose: This study examined the effects of matrix metalloproteinase-inhibiting solutions and aging methods on the bond strength between resin composite and human dentin. Materials and Methods: Crown segments of 105 human non-carious molars were bonded using simulated pulpal pressure at 20 cm water pressure. The teeth were randomly split into 5 groups according to the solution applied: CG (control, no solution), CHX (0.2% chlorhexidine), EPE (10% ethanolic propolis extract), APE (aqueous propolis extract), and E (70% ethanol). Each solution was left on the acid-etched dentin for 1 min. Adper Single Bond 2 and resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) were applied to all specimens. The 5 groups were subdivided according to the aging method: SI (sectioned immediately); S (storage in artificial saliva for 6 months); and T (thermomechanical aging with 240,000 mechanical cycles and 1000 thermal cycles). Specimens were sectioned into sticks and subjected to microtensile testing. Bond strength data were analyzed by two-factor ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: For the factor "solution", there was no significant difference among the groups (p = 0.32). For the factor "aging method", significant differences were found (p < 0.001), with the following mean bond strengths (MPa): SI: 31.1; S: 24.4; T: 26.8. Conclusions: The use of matrix metalloproteinase-inhibiting solutions on dentin as an adjunct to the application of an etch-and-rinse adhesive does not prevent the loss of bond strength after aging. Nevertheless, these solutions have no adverse effect on adhesion to tooth structure.
AB - Purpose: This study examined the effects of matrix metalloproteinase-inhibiting solutions and aging methods on the bond strength between resin composite and human dentin. Materials and Methods: Crown segments of 105 human non-carious molars were bonded using simulated pulpal pressure at 20 cm water pressure. The teeth were randomly split into 5 groups according to the solution applied: CG (control, no solution), CHX (0.2% chlorhexidine), EPE (10% ethanolic propolis extract), APE (aqueous propolis extract), and E (70% ethanol). Each solution was left on the acid-etched dentin for 1 min. Adper Single Bond 2 and resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) were applied to all specimens. The 5 groups were subdivided according to the aging method: SI (sectioned immediately); S (storage in artificial saliva for 6 months); and T (thermomechanical aging with 240,000 mechanical cycles and 1000 thermal cycles). Specimens were sectioned into sticks and subjected to microtensile testing. Bond strength data were analyzed by two-factor ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: For the factor "solution", there was no significant difference among the groups (p = 0.32). For the factor "aging method", significant differences were found (p < 0.001), with the following mean bond strengths (MPa): SI: 31.1; S: 24.4; T: 26.8. Conclusions: The use of matrix metalloproteinase-inhibiting solutions on dentin as an adjunct to the application of an etch-and-rinse adhesive does not prevent the loss of bond strength after aging. Nevertheless, these solutions have no adverse effect on adhesion to tooth structure.
KW - Aging
KW - Matrix metalloproteinase
KW - Resin composite
KW - Tensile strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953856526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953856526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3290/j.jad.a34594
DO - 10.3290/j.jad.a34594
M3 - Article
C2 - 26295068
AN - SCOPUS:84953856526
SN - 1461-5185
VL - 17
SP - 347
EP - 352
JO - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
JF - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
IS - 4
ER -