Effect of Platform Shift on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flap Surgery and Subcrestal Implant Placement in Presence/Absence of Gap Defects

Brent A. Wenzel, Inãki Gamborena, Jaebum Lee, Tiago Fiorini, Peter Schüpbach, Ulf Me Wikesjö, Cristiano Susin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Physiologic remodeling resulting in crestal bone loss appears a common corollary to dental implant surgery. Several hypotheses and clinical strategies have been advanced to explain and avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of clinical protocols uncertain. Purpose: The objective of the present study was to provide a histologic account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at implant sites receiving platform shift/switch and standard abutments following conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement in presence or absence of crestal gap defects using a dog model. Materials and Methods: Four dental implants were placed into the left/right edentulated posterior mandible in five adult male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery including subcrestal placement with/without a 1×5mm (width × depth) gap defect, and using platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Block biopsies were collected for histological/histometric analysis following an 8-week healing interval. Results: No significant differences in crestal resorption were observed among experimental groups; crestal resorption being significantly more advanced at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups; crestal bone-implant contact being consistently below the implant platform at buccal sites (p<.01). Moreover, the peri-implant mucosal profile was not statistically different among groups, the mucosal height being significantly greater at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Also, no significant differences among groups were observed for the apical extension of the epithelial attachment, the epithelial attachment being arrested more than 2mm above the implant platform at both platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Conclusions: Using a clinical strategy including flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement, implant technology comparing platform shift/switch with standard abutments, surgical approach, and abutment selection seems to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-225
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cheek
Epithelial Attachment
Bone and Bones
Dental Implants
Tongue
Dogs
Newfoundland and Labrador
Bone Remodeling
Clinical Protocols
Mandible
Technology
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Alveolar bone
  • Animal models
  • Crestal resorption/remodeling
  • Dental implants
  • Platform shift/switch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effect of Platform Shift on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flap Surgery and Subcrestal Implant Placement in Presence/Absence of Gap Defects. / Wenzel, Brent A.; Gamborena, Inãki; Lee, Jaebum; Fiorini, Tiago; Schüpbach, Peter; Wikesjö, Ulf Me; Susin, Cristiano.

In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 217-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wenzel, Brent A. ; Gamborena, Inãki ; Lee, Jaebum ; Fiorini, Tiago ; Schüpbach, Peter ; Wikesjö, Ulf Me ; Susin, Cristiano. / Effect of Platform Shift on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flap Surgery and Subcrestal Implant Placement in Presence/Absence of Gap Defects. In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 217-225.
@article{7a3b1aed55e54dca9ff72151facecebd,
title = "Effect of Platform Shift on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flap Surgery and Subcrestal Implant Placement in Presence/Absence of Gap Defects",
abstract = "Background: Physiologic remodeling resulting in crestal bone loss appears a common corollary to dental implant surgery. Several hypotheses and clinical strategies have been advanced to explain and avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of clinical protocols uncertain. Purpose: The objective of the present study was to provide a histologic account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at implant sites receiving platform shift/switch and standard abutments following conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement in presence or absence of crestal gap defects using a dog model. Materials and Methods: Four dental implants were placed into the left/right edentulated posterior mandible in five adult male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery including subcrestal placement with/without a 1×5mm (width × depth) gap defect, and using platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Block biopsies were collected for histological/histometric analysis following an 8-week healing interval. Results: No significant differences in crestal resorption were observed among experimental groups; crestal resorption being significantly more advanced at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups; crestal bone-implant contact being consistently below the implant platform at buccal sites (p<.01). Moreover, the peri-implant mucosal profile was not statistically different among groups, the mucosal height being significantly greater at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Also, no significant differences among groups were observed for the apical extension of the epithelial attachment, the epithelial attachment being arrested more than 2mm above the implant platform at both platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Conclusions: Using a clinical strategy including flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement, implant technology comparing platform shift/switch with standard abutments, surgical approach, and abutment selection seems to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile.",
keywords = "Alveolar bone, Animal models, Crestal resorption/remodeling, Dental implants, Platform shift/switch",
author = "Wenzel, {Brent A.} and In{\~a}ki Gamborena and Jaebum Lee and Tiago Fiorini and Peter Sch{\"u}pbach and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf Me} and Cristiano Susin",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cid.12216",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "217--225",
journal = "Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Platform Shift on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flap Surgery and Subcrestal Implant Placement in Presence/Absence of Gap Defects

AU - Wenzel, Brent A.

AU - Gamborena, Inãki

AU - Lee, Jaebum

AU - Fiorini, Tiago

AU - Schüpbach, Peter

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf Me

AU - Susin, Cristiano

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background: Physiologic remodeling resulting in crestal bone loss appears a common corollary to dental implant surgery. Several hypotheses and clinical strategies have been advanced to explain and avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of clinical protocols uncertain. Purpose: The objective of the present study was to provide a histologic account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at implant sites receiving platform shift/switch and standard abutments following conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement in presence or absence of crestal gap defects using a dog model. Materials and Methods: Four dental implants were placed into the left/right edentulated posterior mandible in five adult male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery including subcrestal placement with/without a 1×5mm (width × depth) gap defect, and using platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Block biopsies were collected for histological/histometric analysis following an 8-week healing interval. Results: No significant differences in crestal resorption were observed among experimental groups; crestal resorption being significantly more advanced at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups; crestal bone-implant contact being consistently below the implant platform at buccal sites (p<.01). Moreover, the peri-implant mucosal profile was not statistically different among groups, the mucosal height being significantly greater at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Also, no significant differences among groups were observed for the apical extension of the epithelial attachment, the epithelial attachment being arrested more than 2mm above the implant platform at both platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Conclusions: Using a clinical strategy including flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement, implant technology comparing platform shift/switch with standard abutments, surgical approach, and abutment selection seems to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile.

AB - Background: Physiologic remodeling resulting in crestal bone loss appears a common corollary to dental implant surgery. Several hypotheses and clinical strategies have been advanced to explain and avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of clinical protocols uncertain. Purpose: The objective of the present study was to provide a histologic account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at implant sites receiving platform shift/switch and standard abutments following conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement in presence or absence of crestal gap defects using a dog model. Materials and Methods: Four dental implants were placed into the left/right edentulated posterior mandible in five adult male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery including subcrestal placement with/without a 1×5mm (width × depth) gap defect, and using platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Block biopsies were collected for histological/histometric analysis following an 8-week healing interval. Results: No significant differences in crestal resorption were observed among experimental groups; crestal resorption being significantly more advanced at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups; crestal bone-implant contact being consistently below the implant platform at buccal sites (p<.01). Moreover, the peri-implant mucosal profile was not statistically different among groups, the mucosal height being significantly greater at buccal than at lingual sites (p<.001). Also, no significant differences among groups were observed for the apical extension of the epithelial attachment, the epithelial attachment being arrested more than 2mm above the implant platform at both platform shift/switch and standard abutments. Conclusions: Using a clinical strategy including flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement, implant technology comparing platform shift/switch with standard abutments, surgical approach, and abutment selection seems to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile.

KW - Alveolar bone

KW - Animal models

KW - Crestal resorption/remodeling

KW - Dental implants

KW - Platform shift/switch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895913542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895913542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cid.12216

DO - 10.1111/cid.12216

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 217

EP - 225

JO - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

JF - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 2

ER -