Effect of Platform Shift/Switch and Concave Abutments on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile following Flap and Flapless Implant Surgery

Inãki Gamborena, Jaebum Lee, Tiago Fiorini, Brent A. Wenzel, Peter Schüpbach, Ulf M E Wikesjö, Cristiano Susin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Crestal remodeling/bone loss appears to be a common sequel to dental implant placement. Several hypotheses/clinical strategies have been proposed to explain/avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of these clinical approaches uncertain. Objective: The objective of the present study was to provide a histological account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at platform shift/switch and concave abutments following flapless and conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement using a dog model. Methods: Four dental implants each were placed in the left/right mandibular posterior jaw quadrants in five adult male Hound/Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery with a 1×5mm gap defect or using a flapless approach, both involving placement 2mm subcrestally and platform shift/switch versus concave abutments. Block biopsies for histological/histometric analysis were collected at 8 weeks. Results: No significant differences were observed regarding crestal bone levels, with all groups showing mean bone levels above the implant platform. Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups. Moreover, peri-implant mucosal profiles were not statistically different among groups for buccal sites; average mucosal height reached 4.1 to 4.9mm above the implant platform. Comparison between buccal and lingual sites showed a nonsignificant tendency toward greater crestal resorption at buccal sites, adjusting for other factors. Mean crestal bone-implant contact level approximated the implant platform for lingual sites while consistently remaining below the platform at the buccal sites. Peri-implant mucosal height was significantly higher at buccal than at lingual sites, with the epithelial attachment located a significant distance away from the implant platform at buccal sites. Conclusions: The surgical approaches (subcrestal implant placement by flap surgery or a flapless approach) and abutment designs (platform shift/switch or concave) used in this study seem to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile. Bioclinical strategies should be developed to circumvent the limitations of current clinical protocol.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)908-916
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cheek
Bone and Bones
Tongue
Dental Implants
Bone Remodeling
Epithelial Attachment
Dogs
Newfoundland and Labrador
Clinical Protocols
Jaw
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Alveolar bone
  • Animal models
  • Crestal resorption/remodeling
  • Dental implants
  • Platform shift/switch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effect of Platform Shift/Switch and Concave Abutments on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile following Flap and Flapless Implant Surgery. / Gamborena, Inãki; Lee, Jaebum; Fiorini, Tiago; Wenzel, Brent A.; Schüpbach, Peter; Wikesjö, Ulf M E; Susin, Cristiano.

In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 908-916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gamborena, Inãki ; Lee, Jaebum ; Fiorini, Tiago ; Wenzel, Brent A. ; Schüpbach, Peter ; Wikesjö, Ulf M E ; Susin, Cristiano. / Effect of Platform Shift/Switch and Concave Abutments on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile following Flap and Flapless Implant Surgery. In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 908-916.
@article{c82f2a874ab24338bac6b04eb7f0e6bc,
title = "Effect of Platform Shift/Switch and Concave Abutments on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile following Flap and Flapless Implant Surgery",
abstract = "Background: Crestal remodeling/bone loss appears to be a common sequel to dental implant placement. Several hypotheses/clinical strategies have been proposed to explain/avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of these clinical approaches uncertain. Objective: The objective of the present study was to provide a histological account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at platform shift/switch and concave abutments following flapless and conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement using a dog model. Methods: Four dental implants each were placed in the left/right mandibular posterior jaw quadrants in five adult male Hound/Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery with a 1×5mm gap defect or using a flapless approach, both involving placement 2mm subcrestally and platform shift/switch versus concave abutments. Block biopsies for histological/histometric analysis were collected at 8 weeks. Results: No significant differences were observed regarding crestal bone levels, with all groups showing mean bone levels above the implant platform. Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups. Moreover, peri-implant mucosal profiles were not statistically different among groups for buccal sites; average mucosal height reached 4.1 to 4.9mm above the implant platform. Comparison between buccal and lingual sites showed a nonsignificant tendency toward greater crestal resorption at buccal sites, adjusting for other factors. Mean crestal bone-implant contact level approximated the implant platform for lingual sites while consistently remaining below the platform at the buccal sites. Peri-implant mucosal height was significantly higher at buccal than at lingual sites, with the epithelial attachment located a significant distance away from the implant platform at buccal sites. Conclusions: The surgical approaches (subcrestal implant placement by flap surgery or a flapless approach) and abutment designs (platform shift/switch or concave) used in this study seem to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile. Bioclinical strategies should be developed to circumvent the limitations of current clinical protocol.",
keywords = "Alveolar bone, Animal models, Crestal resorption/remodeling, Dental implants, Platform shift/switch",
author = "In{\~a}ki Gamborena and Jaebum Lee and Tiago Fiorini and Wenzel, {Brent A.} and Peter Sch{\"u}pbach and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf M E} and Cristiano Susin",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cid.12208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "908--916",
journal = "Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Platform Shift/Switch and Concave Abutments on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile following Flap and Flapless Implant Surgery

AU - Gamborena, Inãki

AU - Lee, Jaebum

AU - Fiorini, Tiago

AU - Wenzel, Brent A.

AU - Schüpbach, Peter

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M E

AU - Susin, Cristiano

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Crestal remodeling/bone loss appears to be a common sequel to dental implant placement. Several hypotheses/clinical strategies have been proposed to explain/avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of these clinical approaches uncertain. Objective: The objective of the present study was to provide a histological account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at platform shift/switch and concave abutments following flapless and conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement using a dog model. Methods: Four dental implants each were placed in the left/right mandibular posterior jaw quadrants in five adult male Hound/Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery with a 1×5mm gap defect or using a flapless approach, both involving placement 2mm subcrestally and platform shift/switch versus concave abutments. Block biopsies for histological/histometric analysis were collected at 8 weeks. Results: No significant differences were observed regarding crestal bone levels, with all groups showing mean bone levels above the implant platform. Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups. Moreover, peri-implant mucosal profiles were not statistically different among groups for buccal sites; average mucosal height reached 4.1 to 4.9mm above the implant platform. Comparison between buccal and lingual sites showed a nonsignificant tendency toward greater crestal resorption at buccal sites, adjusting for other factors. Mean crestal bone-implant contact level approximated the implant platform for lingual sites while consistently remaining below the platform at the buccal sites. Peri-implant mucosal height was significantly higher at buccal than at lingual sites, with the epithelial attachment located a significant distance away from the implant platform at buccal sites. Conclusions: The surgical approaches (subcrestal implant placement by flap surgery or a flapless approach) and abutment designs (platform shift/switch or concave) used in this study seem to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile. Bioclinical strategies should be developed to circumvent the limitations of current clinical protocol.

AB - Background: Crestal remodeling/bone loss appears to be a common sequel to dental implant placement. Several hypotheses/clinical strategies have been proposed to explain/avert crestal remodeling; however, causative mechanisms remain unclear and the efficacy of these clinical approaches uncertain. Objective: The objective of the present study was to provide a histological account of crestal bone levels and mucosal profile at platform shift/switch and concave abutments following flapless and conventional flap surgery and subcrestal implant placement using a dog model. Methods: Four dental implants each were placed in the left/right mandibular posterior jaw quadrants in five adult male Hound/Labrador mongrel dogs using flap surgery with a 1×5mm gap defect or using a flapless approach, both involving placement 2mm subcrestally and platform shift/switch versus concave abutments. Block biopsies for histological/histometric analysis were collected at 8 weeks. Results: No significant differences were observed regarding crestal bone levels, with all groups showing mean bone levels above the implant platform. Similarly, crestal bone-implant contact was not significantly different among groups. Moreover, peri-implant mucosal profiles were not statistically different among groups for buccal sites; average mucosal height reached 4.1 to 4.9mm above the implant platform. Comparison between buccal and lingual sites showed a nonsignificant tendency toward greater crestal resorption at buccal sites, adjusting for other factors. Mean crestal bone-implant contact level approximated the implant platform for lingual sites while consistently remaining below the platform at the buccal sites. Peri-implant mucosal height was significantly higher at buccal than at lingual sites, with the epithelial attachment located a significant distance away from the implant platform at buccal sites. Conclusions: The surgical approaches (subcrestal implant placement by flap surgery or a flapless approach) and abutment designs (platform shift/switch or concave) used in this study seem to have a limited impact on crestal remodeling, associated bone loss, and mucosal profile. Bioclinical strategies should be developed to circumvent the limitations of current clinical protocol.

KW - Alveolar bone

KW - Animal models

KW - Crestal resorption/remodeling

KW - Dental implants

KW - Platform shift/switch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943363604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943363604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cid.12208

DO - 10.1111/cid.12208

M3 - Article

C2 - 25881715

AN - SCOPUS:84943363604

VL - 17

SP - 908

EP - 916

JO - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

JF - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 5

ER -