Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke

A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Hannes Devos, Abiodun Emmanuel Akinwuntan, Alice Nieuwboer, Isabelle Ringoot, Karen Van Berghen, Mark Tant, Carlotte Kiekens, Willy De Weerdt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. No long-term studies have been reported on the effect of training programs on driving after stroke. Objectives. The authorsg' primary aim was to determine the effect of simulator versus cognitive rehabilitation therapy on fitness-to-drive at 5 years poststroke. A second aim was to investigate differences in clinical characteristics between stroke survivors who resumed and stopped driving. Methods. In a previously reported randomized controlled trial, 83 stroke survivors received 15 hours of simulator training (n = 42) or cognitive therapy (n = 41). In this 5-year follow-up study, 61 participants were reassessed. Fitness-to-drive decisions were obtained from medical, visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests; 44 participants (simulator group, n = 21; cognitive group, n = 23) completed all assessments. The primary outcome measures were fitness-to-drive decision and current driving status. Results. The authors found that 5 years after stroke, 18 of 30 participants (60%) in the simulator group were considered fit to drive, compared with 15 of 31 (48%) in the cognitive group (P =.36); 34 of 61 (56%) participants were driving. Current drivers were younger (P =.04), had higher Barthel scores (P =.008), had less comorbidity (P =.01), and were less severely depressed (P =.02) than those who gave up driving. Conclusions. The advantage of simulator-based driving training over cognitive rehabilitation therapy, evident at 6 months poststroke, had faded 5 years later. Poststroke drivers were younger and less severely affected and depressed than nondrivers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)843-850
Number of pages8
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Stroke
Rehabilitation
Comorbidity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Education
Drive

Keywords

  • automobile driving
  • randomized controlled trial
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Devos, H., Akinwuntan, A. E., Nieuwboer, A., Ringoot, I., Van Berghen, K., Tant, M., ... De Weerdt, W. (2010). Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke: A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24(9), 843-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310368687

Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke : A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. / Devos, Hannes; Akinwuntan, Abiodun Emmanuel; Nieuwboer, Alice; Ringoot, Isabelle; Van Berghen, Karen; Tant, Mark; Kiekens, Carlotte; De Weerdt, Willy.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 24, No. 9, 01.11.2010, p. 843-850.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Devos, H, Akinwuntan, AE, Nieuwboer, A, Ringoot, I, Van Berghen, K, Tant, M, Kiekens, C & De Weerdt, W 2010, 'Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke: A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial', Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 843-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310368687
Devos, Hannes ; Akinwuntan, Abiodun Emmanuel ; Nieuwboer, Alice ; Ringoot, Isabelle ; Van Berghen, Karen ; Tant, Mark ; Kiekens, Carlotte ; De Weerdt, Willy. / Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke : A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 843-850.
@article{a47de362c532471ebfc49de4b5c06bc3,
title = "Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke: A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background. No long-term studies have been reported on the effect of training programs on driving after stroke. Objectives. The authorsg' primary aim was to determine the effect of simulator versus cognitive rehabilitation therapy on fitness-to-drive at 5 years poststroke. A second aim was to investigate differences in clinical characteristics between stroke survivors who resumed and stopped driving. Methods. In a previously reported randomized controlled trial, 83 stroke survivors received 15 hours of simulator training (n = 42) or cognitive therapy (n = 41). In this 5-year follow-up study, 61 participants were reassessed. Fitness-to-drive decisions were obtained from medical, visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests; 44 participants (simulator group, n = 21; cognitive group, n = 23) completed all assessments. The primary outcome measures were fitness-to-drive decision and current driving status. Results. The authors found that 5 years after stroke, 18 of 30 participants (60{\%}) in the simulator group were considered fit to drive, compared with 15 of 31 (48{\%}) in the cognitive group (P =.36); 34 of 61 (56{\%}) participants were driving. Current drivers were younger (P =.04), had higher Barthel scores (P =.008), had less comorbidity (P =.01), and were less severely depressed (P =.02) than those who gave up driving. Conclusions. The advantage of simulator-based driving training over cognitive rehabilitation therapy, evident at 6 months poststroke, had faded 5 years later. Poststroke drivers were younger and less severely affected and depressed than nondrivers.",
keywords = "automobile driving, randomized controlled trial, stroke",
author = "Hannes Devos and Akinwuntan, {Abiodun Emmanuel} and Alice Nieuwboer and Isabelle Ringoot and {Van Berghen}, Karen and Mark Tant and Carlotte Kiekens and {De Weerdt}, Willy",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1545968310368687",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "843--850",
journal = "Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of simulator training on fitness-to-drive after stroke

T2 - A 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

AU - Devos, Hannes

AU - Akinwuntan, Abiodun Emmanuel

AU - Nieuwboer, Alice

AU - Ringoot, Isabelle

AU - Van Berghen, Karen

AU - Tant, Mark

AU - Kiekens, Carlotte

AU - De Weerdt, Willy

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Background. No long-term studies have been reported on the effect of training programs on driving after stroke. Objectives. The authorsg' primary aim was to determine the effect of simulator versus cognitive rehabilitation therapy on fitness-to-drive at 5 years poststroke. A second aim was to investigate differences in clinical characteristics between stroke survivors who resumed and stopped driving. Methods. In a previously reported randomized controlled trial, 83 stroke survivors received 15 hours of simulator training (n = 42) or cognitive therapy (n = 41). In this 5-year follow-up study, 61 participants were reassessed. Fitness-to-drive decisions were obtained from medical, visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests; 44 participants (simulator group, n = 21; cognitive group, n = 23) completed all assessments. The primary outcome measures were fitness-to-drive decision and current driving status. Results. The authors found that 5 years after stroke, 18 of 30 participants (60%) in the simulator group were considered fit to drive, compared with 15 of 31 (48%) in the cognitive group (P =.36); 34 of 61 (56%) participants were driving. Current drivers were younger (P =.04), had higher Barthel scores (P =.008), had less comorbidity (P =.01), and were less severely depressed (P =.02) than those who gave up driving. Conclusions. The advantage of simulator-based driving training over cognitive rehabilitation therapy, evident at 6 months poststroke, had faded 5 years later. Poststroke drivers were younger and less severely affected and depressed than nondrivers.

AB - Background. No long-term studies have been reported on the effect of training programs on driving after stroke. Objectives. The authorsg' primary aim was to determine the effect of simulator versus cognitive rehabilitation therapy on fitness-to-drive at 5 years poststroke. A second aim was to investigate differences in clinical characteristics between stroke survivors who resumed and stopped driving. Methods. In a previously reported randomized controlled trial, 83 stroke survivors received 15 hours of simulator training (n = 42) or cognitive therapy (n = 41). In this 5-year follow-up study, 61 participants were reassessed. Fitness-to-drive decisions were obtained from medical, visual, neuropsychological, and on-road tests; 44 participants (simulator group, n = 21; cognitive group, n = 23) completed all assessments. The primary outcome measures were fitness-to-drive decision and current driving status. Results. The authors found that 5 years after stroke, 18 of 30 participants (60%) in the simulator group were considered fit to drive, compared with 15 of 31 (48%) in the cognitive group (P =.36); 34 of 61 (56%) participants were driving. Current drivers were younger (P =.04), had higher Barthel scores (P =.008), had less comorbidity (P =.01), and were less severely depressed (P =.02) than those who gave up driving. Conclusions. The advantage of simulator-based driving training over cognitive rehabilitation therapy, evident at 6 months poststroke, had faded 5 years later. Poststroke drivers were younger and less severely affected and depressed than nondrivers.

KW - automobile driving

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649254048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649254048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1545968310368687

DO - 10.1177/1545968310368687

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 843

EP - 850

JO - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

JF - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 9

ER -