Effect of the degree of reverse Trendelenburg position on intraocular pressure during prone spine surgery

A randomized controlled trial

Timothy W. Carey, K. Aaron Shaw, Marissa L. Weber, John Glenden DeVine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background context Postoperative vision loss complicates an estimated 1 in 1,100 prone spine surgical cases. This complication has been attributed to ischemic optic neuropathy, with one proposed reason being perioperative elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP). Previous research has studied the effects of table inclination on IOP in awake volunteers; however, the effects in spine surgery patients have not been investigated for reverse Trendelenburg positioning using a prospective, randomized controlled study design. Purpose To assess the effect of table inclination on IOP in patients undergoing prone spine surgery. Study design Single-center, prospective randomized controlled study. Patient sample Nineteen patients with no history of eye pathology, undergoing prone spine surgery at Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, were randomly assigned to a table position: neutral, 5°, or 10° of reverse Trendelenburg. Outcome measures Intraocular pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), estimated blood loss, fluid resuscitation, and ophthalmologic complication were assessed before and after induction and at incremental times during surgery, beginning at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 60-minute increments thereafter. Methods Multivariate analyses evaluated surgical time, IOP, MAP, estimated blood loss, and fluid resuscitation as a function of table inclination to determine the effect of patient positioning on identified risk factors for postoperative vision loss. Results Surgical times ranged from 33 to 325 minutes. A rapid increase in IOP was noted after prone positioning, with continued increases as time elapsed. The neutral group exhibited statistically higher IOP compared with the 5° reverse Trendelenburg group after 60 minutes and the 10° group through 60 minutes of surgery. The trend continued through 120 minutes; however, because of a lack of power, we were unable to determine the statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences between the 5° and 10° reverse Trendelenburg groups. Conclusions Reverse Trendelenburg positioning elicits decreased IOP compared with prone positioning for surgery times less than 120 minutes. Ten degrees of reverse Trendelenburg attenuate the rise in IOP during prone spine surgery superiorly in comparison with 5°. No significant complications were associated with reverse Trendelenburg positioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2118-2126
Number of pages9
JournalSpine Journal
Volume14
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Head-Down Tilt
Intraocular Pressure
Spine
Randomized Controlled Trials
Operative Time
Resuscitation
Arterial Pressure
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Patient Positioning
Volunteers
Multivariate Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pathology

Keywords

  • Intraocular pressure
  • Postoperative vision loss
  • Prone
  • Reverse Trendelenburg
  • Spine
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of the degree of reverse Trendelenburg position on intraocular pressure during prone spine surgery : A randomized controlled trial. / Carey, Timothy W.; Shaw, K. Aaron; Weber, Marissa L.; DeVine, John Glenden.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 14, No. 9, 01.09.2014, p. 2118-2126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ba13cf670844ef6ac6380532a6d9e36,
title = "Effect of the degree of reverse Trendelenburg position on intraocular pressure during prone spine surgery: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background context Postoperative vision loss complicates an estimated 1 in 1,100 prone spine surgical cases. This complication has been attributed to ischemic optic neuropathy, with one proposed reason being perioperative elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP). Previous research has studied the effects of table inclination on IOP in awake volunteers; however, the effects in spine surgery patients have not been investigated for reverse Trendelenburg positioning using a prospective, randomized controlled study design. Purpose To assess the effect of table inclination on IOP in patients undergoing prone spine surgery. Study design Single-center, prospective randomized controlled study. Patient sample Nineteen patients with no history of eye pathology, undergoing prone spine surgery at Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, were randomly assigned to a table position: neutral, 5°, or 10° of reverse Trendelenburg. Outcome measures Intraocular pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), estimated blood loss, fluid resuscitation, and ophthalmologic complication were assessed before and after induction and at incremental times during surgery, beginning at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 60-minute increments thereafter. Methods Multivariate analyses evaluated surgical time, IOP, MAP, estimated blood loss, and fluid resuscitation as a function of table inclination to determine the effect of patient positioning on identified risk factors for postoperative vision loss. Results Surgical times ranged from 33 to 325 minutes. A rapid increase in IOP was noted after prone positioning, with continued increases as time elapsed. The neutral group exhibited statistically higher IOP compared with the 5° reverse Trendelenburg group after 60 minutes and the 10° group through 60 minutes of surgery. The trend continued through 120 minutes; however, because of a lack of power, we were unable to determine the statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences between the 5° and 10° reverse Trendelenburg groups. Conclusions Reverse Trendelenburg positioning elicits decreased IOP compared with prone positioning for surgery times less than 120 minutes. Ten degrees of reverse Trendelenburg attenuate the rise in IOP during prone spine surgery superiorly in comparison with 5°. No significant complications were associated with reverse Trendelenburg positioning.",
keywords = "Intraocular pressure, Postoperative vision loss, Prone, Reverse Trendelenburg, Spine, Surgery",
author = "Carey, {Timothy W.} and Shaw, {K. Aaron} and Weber, {Marissa L.} and DeVine, {John Glenden}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "2118--2126",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of the degree of reverse Trendelenburg position on intraocular pressure during prone spine surgery

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Carey, Timothy W.

AU - Shaw, K. Aaron

AU - Weber, Marissa L.

AU - DeVine, John Glenden

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Background context Postoperative vision loss complicates an estimated 1 in 1,100 prone spine surgical cases. This complication has been attributed to ischemic optic neuropathy, with one proposed reason being perioperative elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP). Previous research has studied the effects of table inclination on IOP in awake volunteers; however, the effects in spine surgery patients have not been investigated for reverse Trendelenburg positioning using a prospective, randomized controlled study design. Purpose To assess the effect of table inclination on IOP in patients undergoing prone spine surgery. Study design Single-center, prospective randomized controlled study. Patient sample Nineteen patients with no history of eye pathology, undergoing prone spine surgery at Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, were randomly assigned to a table position: neutral, 5°, or 10° of reverse Trendelenburg. Outcome measures Intraocular pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), estimated blood loss, fluid resuscitation, and ophthalmologic complication were assessed before and after induction and at incremental times during surgery, beginning at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 60-minute increments thereafter. Methods Multivariate analyses evaluated surgical time, IOP, MAP, estimated blood loss, and fluid resuscitation as a function of table inclination to determine the effect of patient positioning on identified risk factors for postoperative vision loss. Results Surgical times ranged from 33 to 325 minutes. A rapid increase in IOP was noted after prone positioning, with continued increases as time elapsed. The neutral group exhibited statistically higher IOP compared with the 5° reverse Trendelenburg group after 60 minutes and the 10° group through 60 minutes of surgery. The trend continued through 120 minutes; however, because of a lack of power, we were unable to determine the statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences between the 5° and 10° reverse Trendelenburg groups. Conclusions Reverse Trendelenburg positioning elicits decreased IOP compared with prone positioning for surgery times less than 120 minutes. Ten degrees of reverse Trendelenburg attenuate the rise in IOP during prone spine surgery superiorly in comparison with 5°. No significant complications were associated with reverse Trendelenburg positioning.

AB - Background context Postoperative vision loss complicates an estimated 1 in 1,100 prone spine surgical cases. This complication has been attributed to ischemic optic neuropathy, with one proposed reason being perioperative elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP). Previous research has studied the effects of table inclination on IOP in awake volunteers; however, the effects in spine surgery patients have not been investigated for reverse Trendelenburg positioning using a prospective, randomized controlled study design. Purpose To assess the effect of table inclination on IOP in patients undergoing prone spine surgery. Study design Single-center, prospective randomized controlled study. Patient sample Nineteen patients with no history of eye pathology, undergoing prone spine surgery at Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, were randomly assigned to a table position: neutral, 5°, or 10° of reverse Trendelenburg. Outcome measures Intraocular pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), estimated blood loss, fluid resuscitation, and ophthalmologic complication were assessed before and after induction and at incremental times during surgery, beginning at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 60-minute increments thereafter. Methods Multivariate analyses evaluated surgical time, IOP, MAP, estimated blood loss, and fluid resuscitation as a function of table inclination to determine the effect of patient positioning on identified risk factors for postoperative vision loss. Results Surgical times ranged from 33 to 325 minutes. A rapid increase in IOP was noted after prone positioning, with continued increases as time elapsed. The neutral group exhibited statistically higher IOP compared with the 5° reverse Trendelenburg group after 60 minutes and the 10° group through 60 minutes of surgery. The trend continued through 120 minutes; however, because of a lack of power, we were unable to determine the statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences between the 5° and 10° reverse Trendelenburg groups. Conclusions Reverse Trendelenburg positioning elicits decreased IOP compared with prone positioning for surgery times less than 120 minutes. Ten degrees of reverse Trendelenburg attenuate the rise in IOP during prone spine surgery superiorly in comparison with 5°. No significant complications were associated with reverse Trendelenburg positioning.

KW - Intraocular pressure

KW - Postoperative vision loss

KW - Prone

KW - Reverse Trendelenburg

KW - Spine

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906939229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906939229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.025

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.025

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 2118

EP - 2126

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 9

ER -