Effect of work glove and type of muscle action on grip fatigue

Shirley L. Fleming, Caroline W. Jansen, Scott Hasson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fatigue plays a major role in limiting work performance. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the effect of wearing a work glove on handgrip fatigue; (2) to compare the effect of a sustained grip contraction of concentric versus eccentric nature, named in this study isometric and eccentric; and (3) to determine if there is a relationship between physiological muscle performance and subjective perceptional fatigue during isometric and eccentric gripping. The study had 2 x 2 repeated measures design. The two factors were: (1) glove condition (glove, no glove); and (2) type of contraction (eccentric and isometric). The measurements taken were: (1) time to limit of endurance (T(lim)); (2) rate of perceived effort (RPE); (3) mean power frequency (MPF) derived from the electromyogram (EMG); and (4) the fatigue objective-subjective relationship (FOSR, which is the correlation coefficient between RPE and MPF). Twenty-one normal subjects maintained a handgrip of 60% of their maximal effort until exhaustion for each of the four conditions. During each trial EMG values were recorded every 5 s and RPE values were recorded every 10 s. The RPE was recorded as a subjective value selected from a l0-point Borg scale. The results showed that T(lim) was greater for the no glove condition (p < 0.0005) and for the eccentric muscle action (p < 0.05). The FOSR was greatest for the glove condition (p < 0.03) and for the isometric muscle action (p < 0.013). The MPF decline showed no significant difference for any condition. These data indicate that glove condition and type of handgrip contraction have an effect on physiological fatigue and subjective perception of fatigue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-612
Number of pages12
JournalErgonomics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1997

Fingerprint

Hand Strength
fatigue
Fatigue
Muscle
Fatigue of materials
Muscles
Electromyography
Isometric Contraction
endurance
performance
Values
Durability
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of work glove and type of muscle action on grip fatigue. / Fleming, Shirley L.; Jansen, Caroline W.; Hasson, Scott.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 01.06.1997, p. 601-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fleming, SL, Jansen, CW & Hasson, S 1997, 'Effect of work glove and type of muscle action on grip fatigue', Ergonomics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397187900
Fleming, Shirley L. ; Jansen, Caroline W. ; Hasson, Scott. / Effect of work glove and type of muscle action on grip fatigue. In: Ergonomics. 1997 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 601-612.
@article{b52665db5df44cfda99f8c469df0c7f9,
title = "Effect of work glove and type of muscle action on grip fatigue",
abstract = "Fatigue plays a major role in limiting work performance. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the effect of wearing a work glove on handgrip fatigue; (2) to compare the effect of a sustained grip contraction of concentric versus eccentric nature, named in this study isometric and eccentric; and (3) to determine if there is a relationship between physiological muscle performance and subjective perceptional fatigue during isometric and eccentric gripping. The study had 2 x 2 repeated measures design. The two factors were: (1) glove condition (glove, no glove); and (2) type of contraction (eccentric and isometric). The measurements taken were: (1) time to limit of endurance (T(lim)); (2) rate of perceived effort (RPE); (3) mean power frequency (MPF) derived from the electromyogram (EMG); and (4) the fatigue objective-subjective relationship (FOSR, which is the correlation coefficient between RPE and MPF). Twenty-one normal subjects maintained a handgrip of 60{\%} of their maximal effort until exhaustion for each of the four conditions. During each trial EMG values were recorded every 5 s and RPE values were recorded every 10 s. The RPE was recorded as a subjective value selected from a l0-point Borg scale. The results showed that T(lim) was greater for the no glove condition (p < 0.0005) and for the eccentric muscle action (p < 0.05). The FOSR was greatest for the glove condition (p < 0.03) and for the isometric muscle action (p < 0.013). The MPF decline showed no significant difference for any condition. These data indicate that glove condition and type of handgrip contraction have an effect on physiological fatigue and subjective perception of fatigue.",
author = "Fleming, {Shirley L.} and Jansen, {Caroline W.} and Scott Hasson",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/001401397187900",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "601--612",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of work glove and type of muscle action on grip fatigue

AU - Fleming, Shirley L.

AU - Jansen, Caroline W.

AU - Hasson, Scott

PY - 1997/6/1

Y1 - 1997/6/1

N2 - Fatigue plays a major role in limiting work performance. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the effect of wearing a work glove on handgrip fatigue; (2) to compare the effect of a sustained grip contraction of concentric versus eccentric nature, named in this study isometric and eccentric; and (3) to determine if there is a relationship between physiological muscle performance and subjective perceptional fatigue during isometric and eccentric gripping. The study had 2 x 2 repeated measures design. The two factors were: (1) glove condition (glove, no glove); and (2) type of contraction (eccentric and isometric). The measurements taken were: (1) time to limit of endurance (T(lim)); (2) rate of perceived effort (RPE); (3) mean power frequency (MPF) derived from the electromyogram (EMG); and (4) the fatigue objective-subjective relationship (FOSR, which is the correlation coefficient between RPE and MPF). Twenty-one normal subjects maintained a handgrip of 60% of their maximal effort until exhaustion for each of the four conditions. During each trial EMG values were recorded every 5 s and RPE values were recorded every 10 s. The RPE was recorded as a subjective value selected from a l0-point Borg scale. The results showed that T(lim) was greater for the no glove condition (p < 0.0005) and for the eccentric muscle action (p < 0.05). The FOSR was greatest for the glove condition (p < 0.03) and for the isometric muscle action (p < 0.013). The MPF decline showed no significant difference for any condition. These data indicate that glove condition and type of handgrip contraction have an effect on physiological fatigue and subjective perception of fatigue.

AB - Fatigue plays a major role in limiting work performance. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the effect of wearing a work glove on handgrip fatigue; (2) to compare the effect of a sustained grip contraction of concentric versus eccentric nature, named in this study isometric and eccentric; and (3) to determine if there is a relationship between physiological muscle performance and subjective perceptional fatigue during isometric and eccentric gripping. The study had 2 x 2 repeated measures design. The two factors were: (1) glove condition (glove, no glove); and (2) type of contraction (eccentric and isometric). The measurements taken were: (1) time to limit of endurance (T(lim)); (2) rate of perceived effort (RPE); (3) mean power frequency (MPF) derived from the electromyogram (EMG); and (4) the fatigue objective-subjective relationship (FOSR, which is the correlation coefficient between RPE and MPF). Twenty-one normal subjects maintained a handgrip of 60% of their maximal effort until exhaustion for each of the four conditions. During each trial EMG values were recorded every 5 s and RPE values were recorded every 10 s. The RPE was recorded as a subjective value selected from a l0-point Borg scale. The results showed that T(lim) was greater for the no glove condition (p < 0.0005) and for the eccentric muscle action (p < 0.05). The FOSR was greatest for the glove condition (p < 0.03) and for the isometric muscle action (p < 0.013). The MPF decline showed no significant difference for any condition. These data indicate that glove condition and type of handgrip contraction have an effect on physiological fatigue and subjective perception of fatigue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031172878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031172878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/001401397187900

DO - 10.1080/001401397187900

M3 - Article

C2 - 9174412

AN - SCOPUS:0031172878

VL - 40

SP - 601

EP - 612

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 6

ER -