Effects of a minimal intervention to increase physical activity in women

Daily activity records

Barbara J. Speck, Stephen Warwick Looney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Effective interventions to increase physical activity levels are critical in a nation where inactivity is a national public health problem. Objective: This pilot study examined whether a minimal intervention (daily records of physical activity) increased activity levels in a community sample of working women. Methods: In a longitudinal, pretest-posttest design, 49 working women were randomly assigned at the work site level to the control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 24). At pretest and posttest, subjects completed self-report questionnaires that measured psychological, social-environmental, physical activity, and demographic variables. Subjects in the intervention group kept daily records of their physical activities during the 12-week study, while those in the control group kept no records. In order to compare activity in the two groups, all subjects wore pedometers daily that recorded number of steps. Results: There was a significant difference between groups in the pedometer values (mean number of daily steps) at the end of the study period (mean difference ± SE: 2147 ± 636, p = .022) (2000 steps = approximately 1 mile). Multiple regression analysis showed that only the intervention (p = .003) was a significant predictor of the pedometer values. Hierarchical data analysis was used to account for the intra-class correlation of 0.48 within work site. Conclusion: Results from this sample of 49 women indicated that mean activity was greater in the intervention group compared to the control group. Recording daily activity is a cost-effective and acceptable intervention that may increase activity levels in women. However, more research is recommended to study the dual role of activity records as a data collection method as well as a potential intervention to increase physical activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)374-378
Number of pages5
JournalNursing Research
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise
Working Women
Workplace
Control Groups
Self Report
Public Health
Regression Analysis
Demography
Psychology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Daily activity records
  • Intervention
  • Physical activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Effects of a minimal intervention to increase physical activity in women : Daily activity records. / Speck, Barbara J.; Looney, Stephen Warwick.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 50, No. 6, 01.01.2001, p. 374-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{452d67d3a95d49f3b5dae39ab154398d,
title = "Effects of a minimal intervention to increase physical activity in women: Daily activity records",
abstract = "Background: Effective interventions to increase physical activity levels are critical in a nation where inactivity is a national public health problem. Objective: This pilot study examined whether a minimal intervention (daily records of physical activity) increased activity levels in a community sample of working women. Methods: In a longitudinal, pretest-posttest design, 49 working women were randomly assigned at the work site level to the control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 24). At pretest and posttest, subjects completed self-report questionnaires that measured psychological, social-environmental, physical activity, and demographic variables. Subjects in the intervention group kept daily records of their physical activities during the 12-week study, while those in the control group kept no records. In order to compare activity in the two groups, all subjects wore pedometers daily that recorded number of steps. Results: There was a significant difference between groups in the pedometer values (mean number of daily steps) at the end of the study period (mean difference ± SE: 2147 ± 636, p = .022) (2000 steps = approximately 1 mile). Multiple regression analysis showed that only the intervention (p = .003) was a significant predictor of the pedometer values. Hierarchical data analysis was used to account for the intra-class correlation of 0.48 within work site. Conclusion: Results from this sample of 49 women indicated that mean activity was greater in the intervention group compared to the control group. Recording daily activity is a cost-effective and acceptable intervention that may increase activity levels in women. However, more research is recommended to study the dual role of activity records as a data collection method as well as a potential intervention to increase physical activity.",
keywords = "Daily activity records, Intervention, Physical activity",
author = "Speck, {Barbara J.} and Looney, {Stephen Warwick}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00006199-200111000-00008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "374--378",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of a minimal intervention to increase physical activity in women

T2 - Daily activity records

AU - Speck, Barbara J.

AU - Looney, Stephen Warwick

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Background: Effective interventions to increase physical activity levels are critical in a nation where inactivity is a national public health problem. Objective: This pilot study examined whether a minimal intervention (daily records of physical activity) increased activity levels in a community sample of working women. Methods: In a longitudinal, pretest-posttest design, 49 working women were randomly assigned at the work site level to the control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 24). At pretest and posttest, subjects completed self-report questionnaires that measured psychological, social-environmental, physical activity, and demographic variables. Subjects in the intervention group kept daily records of their physical activities during the 12-week study, while those in the control group kept no records. In order to compare activity in the two groups, all subjects wore pedometers daily that recorded number of steps. Results: There was a significant difference between groups in the pedometer values (mean number of daily steps) at the end of the study period (mean difference ± SE: 2147 ± 636, p = .022) (2000 steps = approximately 1 mile). Multiple regression analysis showed that only the intervention (p = .003) was a significant predictor of the pedometer values. Hierarchical data analysis was used to account for the intra-class correlation of 0.48 within work site. Conclusion: Results from this sample of 49 women indicated that mean activity was greater in the intervention group compared to the control group. Recording daily activity is a cost-effective and acceptable intervention that may increase activity levels in women. However, more research is recommended to study the dual role of activity records as a data collection method as well as a potential intervention to increase physical activity.

AB - Background: Effective interventions to increase physical activity levels are critical in a nation where inactivity is a national public health problem. Objective: This pilot study examined whether a minimal intervention (daily records of physical activity) increased activity levels in a community sample of working women. Methods: In a longitudinal, pretest-posttest design, 49 working women were randomly assigned at the work site level to the control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 24). At pretest and posttest, subjects completed self-report questionnaires that measured psychological, social-environmental, physical activity, and demographic variables. Subjects in the intervention group kept daily records of their physical activities during the 12-week study, while those in the control group kept no records. In order to compare activity in the two groups, all subjects wore pedometers daily that recorded number of steps. Results: There was a significant difference between groups in the pedometer values (mean number of daily steps) at the end of the study period (mean difference ± SE: 2147 ± 636, p = .022) (2000 steps = approximately 1 mile). Multiple regression analysis showed that only the intervention (p = .003) was a significant predictor of the pedometer values. Hierarchical data analysis was used to account for the intra-class correlation of 0.48 within work site. Conclusion: Results from this sample of 49 women indicated that mean activity was greater in the intervention group compared to the control group. Recording daily activity is a cost-effective and acceptable intervention that may increase activity levels in women. However, more research is recommended to study the dual role of activity records as a data collection method as well as a potential intervention to increase physical activity.

KW - Daily activity records

KW - Intervention

KW - Physical activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035512728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035512728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00006199-200111000-00008

DO - 10.1097/00006199-200111000-00008

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 374

EP - 378

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 6

ER -