Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults

Michael P. Foley, Brian Prax, Richard Crowell, Tommy Boone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare cardiorespiratory demands imposed during unassisted ambulation and ambulation with various assistive devices in older adults. Subjects. Ten volunteers (3 male, 7 female) who were not dependent on assistive devices for ambulation, with a mean age 60.3 years (SD=8.4, range=50-74), participated. Methods. Immediately after a 5-minute steady-state session with each of the assistive devices tested (standard walker, wheeled walker, and single-point cane), subjects ambulated for 2 minutes at a self-selected speed with each device and unassisted while selected cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables were monitored. Results. Ambulation with the use of a standard walker was shown to require 212% more oxygen per meter than unassisted ambulation and 104% more oxygen per meter than ambulation with a wheeled walker. Ambulation with a standard walker elicited 200% and 98% higher heart rate per meter as compared with unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a wheeled walker, respectively. No difference was detected for physiologic demands between unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a cane. Conclusion and Discussion. The decision to prescribe a wheeled walker versus a standard walker may be clinically important with patients who have impaired cardiorespiratory systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1313-1319
Number of pages7
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume76
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Self-Help Devices
Walking
Canes
Oxygen
Volunteers
Heart Rate

Keywords

  • Ambulation aids
  • Cardiovascular system
  • Gait analysis
  • general
  • Geriatrics
  • Oxygen cost
  • Respiratory system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults. / Foley, Michael P.; Prax, Brian; Crowell, Richard; Boone, Tommy.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 76, No. 12, 01.01.1996, p. 1313-1319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Foley, MP, Prax, B, Crowell, R & Boone, T 1996, 'Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults', Physical Therapy, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 1313-1319. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/76.12.1313
Foley, Michael P. ; Prax, Brian ; Crowell, Richard ; Boone, Tommy. / Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults. In: Physical Therapy. 1996 ; Vol. 76, No. 12. pp. 1313-1319.
@article{15036bf799e1483984565c903001790d,
title = "Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults",
abstract = "Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare cardiorespiratory demands imposed during unassisted ambulation and ambulation with various assistive devices in older adults. Subjects. Ten volunteers (3 male, 7 female) who were not dependent on assistive devices for ambulation, with a mean age 60.3 years (SD=8.4, range=50-74), participated. Methods. Immediately after a 5-minute steady-state session with each of the assistive devices tested (standard walker, wheeled walker, and single-point cane), subjects ambulated for 2 minutes at a self-selected speed with each device and unassisted while selected cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables were monitored. Results. Ambulation with the use of a standard walker was shown to require 212{\%} more oxygen per meter than unassisted ambulation and 104{\%} more oxygen per meter than ambulation with a wheeled walker. Ambulation with a standard walker elicited 200{\%} and 98{\%} higher heart rate per meter as compared with unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a wheeled walker, respectively. No difference was detected for physiologic demands between unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a cane. Conclusion and Discussion. The decision to prescribe a wheeled walker versus a standard walker may be clinically important with patients who have impaired cardiorespiratory systems.",
keywords = "Ambulation aids, Cardiovascular system, Gait analysis, general, Geriatrics, Oxygen cost, Respiratory system",
author = "Foley, {Michael P.} and Brian Prax and Richard Crowell and Tommy Boone",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ptj/76.12.1313",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1313--1319",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults

AU - Foley, Michael P.

AU - Prax, Brian

AU - Crowell, Richard

AU - Boone, Tommy

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare cardiorespiratory demands imposed during unassisted ambulation and ambulation with various assistive devices in older adults. Subjects. Ten volunteers (3 male, 7 female) who were not dependent on assistive devices for ambulation, with a mean age 60.3 years (SD=8.4, range=50-74), participated. Methods. Immediately after a 5-minute steady-state session with each of the assistive devices tested (standard walker, wheeled walker, and single-point cane), subjects ambulated for 2 minutes at a self-selected speed with each device and unassisted while selected cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables were monitored. Results. Ambulation with the use of a standard walker was shown to require 212% more oxygen per meter than unassisted ambulation and 104% more oxygen per meter than ambulation with a wheeled walker. Ambulation with a standard walker elicited 200% and 98% higher heart rate per meter as compared with unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a wheeled walker, respectively. No difference was detected for physiologic demands between unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a cane. Conclusion and Discussion. The decision to prescribe a wheeled walker versus a standard walker may be clinically important with patients who have impaired cardiorespiratory systems.

AB - Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare cardiorespiratory demands imposed during unassisted ambulation and ambulation with various assistive devices in older adults. Subjects. Ten volunteers (3 male, 7 female) who were not dependent on assistive devices for ambulation, with a mean age 60.3 years (SD=8.4, range=50-74), participated. Methods. Immediately after a 5-minute steady-state session with each of the assistive devices tested (standard walker, wheeled walker, and single-point cane), subjects ambulated for 2 minutes at a self-selected speed with each device and unassisted while selected cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables were monitored. Results. Ambulation with the use of a standard walker was shown to require 212% more oxygen per meter than unassisted ambulation and 104% more oxygen per meter than ambulation with a wheeled walker. Ambulation with a standard walker elicited 200% and 98% higher heart rate per meter as compared with unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a wheeled walker, respectively. No difference was detected for physiologic demands between unassisted ambulation and ambulation with a cane. Conclusion and Discussion. The decision to prescribe a wheeled walker versus a standard walker may be clinically important with patients who have impaired cardiorespiratory systems.

KW - Ambulation aids

KW - Cardiovascular system

KW - Gait analysis

KW - general

KW - Geriatrics

KW - Oxygen cost

KW - Respiratory system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029730696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029730696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ptj/76.12.1313

DO - 10.1093/ptj/76.12.1313

M3 - Article

C2 - 8960000

AN - SCOPUS:0029730696

VL - 76

SP - 1313

EP - 1319

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 12

ER -