Effects of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength.

Y. Shono, M. Terashita, E. L. Pashley, P. D. Brewer, David Henry Pashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It was hypothesized that there is an inverse relationship between resin-enamel bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area, and that there are regional differences in resin-enamel bond strength. METHODS: The facial and lingual surfaces of extracted human third molars were ground down 0.3 mm using 240 grit abrasive paper and were then bonded with either Clearfil Liner Bond 2 or Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus adhesive systems using the manufacturer's instructions. The bonded surfaces then received a resin composite build-up. After 24 h of storage in water, the bonded teeth were vertically serially sectioned into 1.0 mm thick slabs using a diamond saw, and the bonded surface area at the resin-enamel interface was varied from 0.5 to 3.0 mm2 using a diamond saw under microscopic observation. The trimmed region was varied from the occlusal third of the facial or lingual enamel to the middle third, to the cervical third. The trimmed specimens were then glued to a Bencor Multi-T device, placed in an Instron testing machine and stressed to failure at 1 mm/min. A three-factor ANOVA was used to compare bond strengths (buccal vs. lingual, occlusal vs. middle vs. cervical-third, vs. materials). Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area for each material on occlusal enamel. RESULTS: For both bonding systems, there was a highly significant (p < 0.001) inverse exponential relationship between tensile bond strength (y axis) and bonded cross-sectional area (x axis) with y intercepts of 51 and 59 MPa for Clearfill Liner Bond 2 and Multi-Purpose Plus, respectively. Using both materials, the highest bond strengths were measured in the occlusal third, which were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those made to cervical enamel. SIGNIFICANCE: Like resin-dentin bonds, resin-enamel bonds exhibit an inverse relationship with cross-sectional area. This relationship becomes more apparent at bonded surface areas below 2 mm2 and is probably due to reductions in the number of interfacial stress-raisers as samples are made smaller.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-296
Number of pages7
JournalDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Enamels
Tensile Strength
Dental Enamel
Resins
Tongue
Diamond cutting tools
Diamond
Third Molar
Composite Resins
Cheek
Dentin
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Abrasives
Regression analysis
Adhesives
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Regression Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Effects of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength. / Shono, Y.; Terashita, M.; Pashley, E. L.; Brewer, P. D.; Pashley, David Henry.

In: Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, Vol. 13, No. 5, 01.01.1997, p. 290-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shono, Y. ; Terashita, M. ; Pashley, E. L. ; Brewer, P. D. ; Pashley, David Henry. / Effects of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength. In: Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 1997 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 290-296.
@article{886004f5e5f749dfacc2330ab787bcdd,
title = "Effects of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: It was hypothesized that there is an inverse relationship between resin-enamel bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area, and that there are regional differences in resin-enamel bond strength. METHODS: The facial and lingual surfaces of extracted human third molars were ground down 0.3 mm using 240 grit abrasive paper and were then bonded with either Clearfil Liner Bond 2 or Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus adhesive systems using the manufacturer's instructions. The bonded surfaces then received a resin composite build-up. After 24 h of storage in water, the bonded teeth were vertically serially sectioned into 1.0 mm thick slabs using a diamond saw, and the bonded surface area at the resin-enamel interface was varied from 0.5 to 3.0 mm2 using a diamond saw under microscopic observation. The trimmed region was varied from the occlusal third of the facial or lingual enamel to the middle third, to the cervical third. The trimmed specimens were then glued to a Bencor Multi-T device, placed in an Instron testing machine and stressed to failure at 1 mm/min. A three-factor ANOVA was used to compare bond strengths (buccal vs. lingual, occlusal vs. middle vs. cervical-third, vs. materials). Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area for each material on occlusal enamel. RESULTS: For both bonding systems, there was a highly significant (p < 0.001) inverse exponential relationship between tensile bond strength (y axis) and bonded cross-sectional area (x axis) with y intercepts of 51 and 59 MPa for Clearfill Liner Bond 2 and Multi-Purpose Plus, respectively. Using both materials, the highest bond strengths were measured in the occlusal third, which were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those made to cervical enamel. SIGNIFICANCE: Like resin-dentin bonds, resin-enamel bonds exhibit an inverse relationship with cross-sectional area. This relationship becomes more apparent at bonded surface areas below 2 mm2 and is probably due to reductions in the number of interfacial stress-raisers as samples are made smaller.",
author = "Y. Shono and M. Terashita and Pashley, {E. L.} and Brewer, {P. D.} and Pashley, {David Henry}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80098-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "290--296",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength.

AU - Shono, Y.

AU - Terashita, M.

AU - Pashley, E. L.

AU - Brewer, P. D.

AU - Pashley, David Henry

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: It was hypothesized that there is an inverse relationship between resin-enamel bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area, and that there are regional differences in resin-enamel bond strength. METHODS: The facial and lingual surfaces of extracted human third molars were ground down 0.3 mm using 240 grit abrasive paper and were then bonded with either Clearfil Liner Bond 2 or Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus adhesive systems using the manufacturer's instructions. The bonded surfaces then received a resin composite build-up. After 24 h of storage in water, the bonded teeth were vertically serially sectioned into 1.0 mm thick slabs using a diamond saw, and the bonded surface area at the resin-enamel interface was varied from 0.5 to 3.0 mm2 using a diamond saw under microscopic observation. The trimmed region was varied from the occlusal third of the facial or lingual enamel to the middle third, to the cervical third. The trimmed specimens were then glued to a Bencor Multi-T device, placed in an Instron testing machine and stressed to failure at 1 mm/min. A three-factor ANOVA was used to compare bond strengths (buccal vs. lingual, occlusal vs. middle vs. cervical-third, vs. materials). Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area for each material on occlusal enamel. RESULTS: For both bonding systems, there was a highly significant (p < 0.001) inverse exponential relationship between tensile bond strength (y axis) and bonded cross-sectional area (x axis) with y intercepts of 51 and 59 MPa for Clearfill Liner Bond 2 and Multi-Purpose Plus, respectively. Using both materials, the highest bond strengths were measured in the occlusal third, which were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those made to cervical enamel. SIGNIFICANCE: Like resin-dentin bonds, resin-enamel bonds exhibit an inverse relationship with cross-sectional area. This relationship becomes more apparent at bonded surface areas below 2 mm2 and is probably due to reductions in the number of interfacial stress-raisers as samples are made smaller.

AB - OBJECTIVE: It was hypothesized that there is an inverse relationship between resin-enamel bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area, and that there are regional differences in resin-enamel bond strength. METHODS: The facial and lingual surfaces of extracted human third molars were ground down 0.3 mm using 240 grit abrasive paper and were then bonded with either Clearfil Liner Bond 2 or Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus adhesive systems using the manufacturer's instructions. The bonded surfaces then received a resin composite build-up. After 24 h of storage in water, the bonded teeth were vertically serially sectioned into 1.0 mm thick slabs using a diamond saw, and the bonded surface area at the resin-enamel interface was varied from 0.5 to 3.0 mm2 using a diamond saw under microscopic observation. The trimmed region was varied from the occlusal third of the facial or lingual enamel to the middle third, to the cervical third. The trimmed specimens were then glued to a Bencor Multi-T device, placed in an Instron testing machine and stressed to failure at 1 mm/min. A three-factor ANOVA was used to compare bond strengths (buccal vs. lingual, occlusal vs. middle vs. cervical-third, vs. materials). Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between bond strength and bonded cross-sectional area for each material on occlusal enamel. RESULTS: For both bonding systems, there was a highly significant (p < 0.001) inverse exponential relationship between tensile bond strength (y axis) and bonded cross-sectional area (x axis) with y intercepts of 51 and 59 MPa for Clearfill Liner Bond 2 and Multi-Purpose Plus, respectively. Using both materials, the highest bond strengths were measured in the occlusal third, which were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those made to cervical enamel. SIGNIFICANCE: Like resin-dentin bonds, resin-enamel bonds exhibit an inverse relationship with cross-sectional area. This relationship becomes more apparent at bonded surface areas below 2 mm2 and is probably due to reductions in the number of interfacial stress-raisers as samples are made smaller.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031240098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031240098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80098-X

DO - 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80098-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 9823088

AN - SCOPUS:0031240098

VL - 13

SP - 290

EP - 296

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 5

ER -