Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals

Li Na Niu, Xiao Juan Luo, Guo Hua Li, Eduardo A. Bortoluzzi, Jing Mao, Ji Hua Chen, James L. Gutmann, David H. Pashley, Franklin Chi Meng Tay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives The effects of different EndoActivator® (EA) sonic activation protocols on root canal debridement efficacy were examined. Methods Root canals in 48 single-rooted teeth were instrumented, irrigated initially with NaOCl and divided into 6 groups (N = 8) based on the application time of QMix (antimicrobial calcium-chelating irrigant), and the time and sequence of EA irrigant activation - Positive Control: 90 s QMix; Negative Control: 90 s saline; Group 1A: 15 s QMix + 15 s QMix with EA-activation; Group 1B: 30 s QMix + 30 s of QMix with EA-activation; Group 2A: 15 s QMix with EA-activation + 15 s QMix; Group 2B: 30 s QMix with EA-activation + 30 s QMix. Split roots were examined with scanning electron microscopy for assignment of smear and debris scores in locations along the coronal, middle and apical thirds of the canals. The overall cleanliness of pooled canal locations in the Positive Control and the 4 experimental groups were compared with chi-square tests. Results Significant differences were detected among the 5 groups (P < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that the overall canal cleanliness was in the order (from best to worst): 1B = 2B > 2A > 1A > Positive Control. Completely clean canals could not be achieved due to the absence of continuous irrigant flow for EA to clear intraradicular debris. Conclusions Irrespective of the sonic activation sequence, irrigant activation for 30 s during a 60-s period of QMix application appears to maximise the smear layer and debris removal potential of the EndoActivator® system. Clinical significance Sonic activation of root canal irrigants produces cleaner root canals and reduces the time required for final delivery of a canal wall smear later-removing irrigant when compared to the use of needle irrigation alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001-1009
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume42
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Dental Pulp Cavity
Debridement
Tooth
Root Canal Irrigants
Smear Layer
Chi-Square Distribution
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Needles
Calcium

Keywords

  • Cleanliness
  • Debris
  • Irrigants
  • Root canal
  • Smear layer
  • Sonic activation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals. / Niu, Li Na; Luo, Xiao Juan; Li, Guo Hua; Bortoluzzi, Eduardo A.; Mao, Jing; Chen, Ji Hua; Gutmann, James L.; Pashley, David H.; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 42, No. 8, 01.01.2014, p. 1001-1009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niu, LN, Luo, XJ, Li, GH, Bortoluzzi, EA, Mao, J, Chen, JH, Gutmann, JL, Pashley, DH & Tay, FCM 2014, 'Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals', Journal of Dentistry, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1001-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.007
Niu, Li Na ; Luo, Xiao Juan ; Li, Guo Hua ; Bortoluzzi, Eduardo A. ; Mao, Jing ; Chen, Ji Hua ; Gutmann, James L. ; Pashley, David H. ; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng. / Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 8. pp. 1001-1009.
@article{e9060fbf70cf40a9b5e7193309c5c01e,
title = "Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals",
abstract = "Objectives The effects of different EndoActivator{\circledR} (EA) sonic activation protocols on root canal debridement efficacy were examined. Methods Root canals in 48 single-rooted teeth were instrumented, irrigated initially with NaOCl and divided into 6 groups (N = 8) based on the application time of QMix (antimicrobial calcium-chelating irrigant), and the time and sequence of EA irrigant activation - Positive Control: 90 s QMix; Negative Control: 90 s saline; Group 1A: 15 s QMix + 15 s QMix with EA-activation; Group 1B: 30 s QMix + 30 s of QMix with EA-activation; Group 2A: 15 s QMix with EA-activation + 15 s QMix; Group 2B: 30 s QMix with EA-activation + 30 s QMix. Split roots were examined with scanning electron microscopy for assignment of smear and debris scores in locations along the coronal, middle and apical thirds of the canals. The overall cleanliness of pooled canal locations in the Positive Control and the 4 experimental groups were compared with chi-square tests. Results Significant differences were detected among the 5 groups (P < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that the overall canal cleanliness was in the order (from best to worst): 1B = 2B > 2A > 1A > Positive Control. Completely clean canals could not be achieved due to the absence of continuous irrigant flow for EA to clear intraradicular debris. Conclusions Irrespective of the sonic activation sequence, irrigant activation for 30 s during a 60-s period of QMix application appears to maximise the smear layer and debris removal potential of the EndoActivator{\circledR} system. Clinical significance Sonic activation of root canal irrigants produces cleaner root canals and reduces the time required for final delivery of a canal wall smear later-removing irrigant when compared to the use of needle irrigation alone.",
keywords = "Cleanliness, Debris, Irrigants, Root canal, Smear layer, Sonic activation",
author = "Niu, {Li Na} and Luo, {Xiao Juan} and Li, {Guo Hua} and Bortoluzzi, {Eduardo A.} and Jing Mao and Chen, {Ji Hua} and Gutmann, {James L.} and Pashley, {David H.} and Tay, {Franklin Chi Meng}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1001--1009",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals

AU - Niu, Li Na

AU - Luo, Xiao Juan

AU - Li, Guo Hua

AU - Bortoluzzi, Eduardo A.

AU - Mao, Jing

AU - Chen, Ji Hua

AU - Gutmann, James L.

AU - Pashley, David H.

AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objectives The effects of different EndoActivator® (EA) sonic activation protocols on root canal debridement efficacy were examined. Methods Root canals in 48 single-rooted teeth were instrumented, irrigated initially with NaOCl and divided into 6 groups (N = 8) based on the application time of QMix (antimicrobial calcium-chelating irrigant), and the time and sequence of EA irrigant activation - Positive Control: 90 s QMix; Negative Control: 90 s saline; Group 1A: 15 s QMix + 15 s QMix with EA-activation; Group 1B: 30 s QMix + 30 s of QMix with EA-activation; Group 2A: 15 s QMix with EA-activation + 15 s QMix; Group 2B: 30 s QMix with EA-activation + 30 s QMix. Split roots were examined with scanning electron microscopy for assignment of smear and debris scores in locations along the coronal, middle and apical thirds of the canals. The overall cleanliness of pooled canal locations in the Positive Control and the 4 experimental groups were compared with chi-square tests. Results Significant differences were detected among the 5 groups (P < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that the overall canal cleanliness was in the order (from best to worst): 1B = 2B > 2A > 1A > Positive Control. Completely clean canals could not be achieved due to the absence of continuous irrigant flow for EA to clear intraradicular debris. Conclusions Irrespective of the sonic activation sequence, irrigant activation for 30 s during a 60-s period of QMix application appears to maximise the smear layer and debris removal potential of the EndoActivator® system. Clinical significance Sonic activation of root canal irrigants produces cleaner root canals and reduces the time required for final delivery of a canal wall smear later-removing irrigant when compared to the use of needle irrigation alone.

AB - Objectives The effects of different EndoActivator® (EA) sonic activation protocols on root canal debridement efficacy were examined. Methods Root canals in 48 single-rooted teeth were instrumented, irrigated initially with NaOCl and divided into 6 groups (N = 8) based on the application time of QMix (antimicrobial calcium-chelating irrigant), and the time and sequence of EA irrigant activation - Positive Control: 90 s QMix; Negative Control: 90 s saline; Group 1A: 15 s QMix + 15 s QMix with EA-activation; Group 1B: 30 s QMix + 30 s of QMix with EA-activation; Group 2A: 15 s QMix with EA-activation + 15 s QMix; Group 2B: 30 s QMix with EA-activation + 30 s QMix. Split roots were examined with scanning electron microscopy for assignment of smear and debris scores in locations along the coronal, middle and apical thirds of the canals. The overall cleanliness of pooled canal locations in the Positive Control and the 4 experimental groups were compared with chi-square tests. Results Significant differences were detected among the 5 groups (P < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that the overall canal cleanliness was in the order (from best to worst): 1B = 2B > 2A > 1A > Positive Control. Completely clean canals could not be achieved due to the absence of continuous irrigant flow for EA to clear intraradicular debris. Conclusions Irrespective of the sonic activation sequence, irrigant activation for 30 s during a 60-s period of QMix application appears to maximise the smear layer and debris removal potential of the EndoActivator® system. Clinical significance Sonic activation of root canal irrigants produces cleaner root canals and reduces the time required for final delivery of a canal wall smear later-removing irrigant when compared to the use of needle irrigation alone.

KW - Cleanliness

KW - Debris

KW - Irrigants

KW - Root canal

KW - Smear layer

KW - Sonic activation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905039407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905039407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.007

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1001

EP - 1009

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 8

ER -