Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jessica M. Pisegna, Asako Kaneoka, William Gordon Pearson, Sandeep Kumar, Susan E. Langmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this review is to evaluate the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. Methods: Thirteen databases were systematically searched through July 2014. Studies had to meet pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each study's methodological quality was examined. Effect sizes were calculated from extracted data and combined for an overall summary statistic. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included. These trials revealed a significant, moderate pooled effect size (0.55; 95% CI = 0.17, 0.93; p = 0.004). Studies stimulating the affected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.46 (95% CI = -0.18, 1.11; p = 0.16); studies stimulating the unaffected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.65 (95% CI = 0.14, 1.16; p = 0.01). At long-term follow up, three studies demonstrated a large but non-significant pooled effect size (0.81, p = 0.11). Conclusions: This review found evidence for the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. A significant effect size resulted when stimulating the unaffected rather than the affected hemisphere. This finding is in agreement with previous studies implicating the plasticity of cortical neurons in the unaffected hemisphere. Significance: Non-invasive brain stimulation appears to assist cortical reorganization in post-stroke dysphagia but emerging factors highlight the need for more data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)956-968
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume127
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Deglutition Disorders
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Stroke
Brain
Databases
Neurons

Keywords

  • Dysphagia
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation
  • Post-stroke population
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
  • Unilateral lesion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. / Pisegna, Jessica M.; Kaneoka, Asako; Pearson, William Gordon; Kumar, Sandeep; Langmore, Susan E.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 127, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 956-968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pisegna, Jessica M. ; Kaneoka, Asako ; Pearson, William Gordon ; Kumar, Sandeep ; Langmore, Susan E. / Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016 ; Vol. 127, No. 1. pp. 956-968.
@article{1d9ae283f65d4cc68e9e4cbf5db08487,
title = "Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials",
abstract = "Objective: The primary aim of this review is to evaluate the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. Methods: Thirteen databases were systematically searched through July 2014. Studies had to meet pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each study's methodological quality was examined. Effect sizes were calculated from extracted data and combined for an overall summary statistic. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included. These trials revealed a significant, moderate pooled effect size (0.55; 95{\%} CI = 0.17, 0.93; p = 0.004). Studies stimulating the affected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.46 (95{\%} CI = -0.18, 1.11; p = 0.16); studies stimulating the unaffected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.65 (95{\%} CI = 0.14, 1.16; p = 0.01). At long-term follow up, three studies demonstrated a large but non-significant pooled effect size (0.81, p = 0.11). Conclusions: This review found evidence for the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. A significant effect size resulted when stimulating the unaffected rather than the affected hemisphere. This finding is in agreement with previous studies implicating the plasticity of cortical neurons in the unaffected hemisphere. Significance: Non-invasive brain stimulation appears to assist cortical reorganization in post-stroke dysphagia but emerging factors highlight the need for more data.",
keywords = "Dysphagia, Non-invasive brain stimulation, Post-stroke population, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), Unilateral lesion",
author = "Pisegna, {Jessica M.} and Asako Kaneoka and Pearson, {William Gordon} and Sandeep Kumar and Langmore, {Susan E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "956--968",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AU - Pisegna, Jessica M.

AU - Kaneoka, Asako

AU - Pearson, William Gordon

AU - Kumar, Sandeep

AU - Langmore, Susan E.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective: The primary aim of this review is to evaluate the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. Methods: Thirteen databases were systematically searched through July 2014. Studies had to meet pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each study's methodological quality was examined. Effect sizes were calculated from extracted data and combined for an overall summary statistic. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included. These trials revealed a significant, moderate pooled effect size (0.55; 95% CI = 0.17, 0.93; p = 0.004). Studies stimulating the affected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.46 (95% CI = -0.18, 1.11; p = 0.16); studies stimulating the unaffected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.65 (95% CI = 0.14, 1.16; p = 0.01). At long-term follow up, three studies demonstrated a large but non-significant pooled effect size (0.81, p = 0.11). Conclusions: This review found evidence for the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. A significant effect size resulted when stimulating the unaffected rather than the affected hemisphere. This finding is in agreement with previous studies implicating the plasticity of cortical neurons in the unaffected hemisphere. Significance: Non-invasive brain stimulation appears to assist cortical reorganization in post-stroke dysphagia but emerging factors highlight the need for more data.

AB - Objective: The primary aim of this review is to evaluate the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. Methods: Thirteen databases were systematically searched through July 2014. Studies had to meet pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each study's methodological quality was examined. Effect sizes were calculated from extracted data and combined for an overall summary statistic. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included. These trials revealed a significant, moderate pooled effect size (0.55; 95% CI = 0.17, 0.93; p = 0.004). Studies stimulating the affected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.46 (95% CI = -0.18, 1.11; p = 0.16); studies stimulating the unaffected hemisphere had a combined effect size of 0.65 (95% CI = 0.14, 1.16; p = 0.01). At long-term follow up, three studies demonstrated a large but non-significant pooled effect size (0.81, p = 0.11). Conclusions: This review found evidence for the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. A significant effect size resulted when stimulating the unaffected rather than the affected hemisphere. This finding is in agreement with previous studies implicating the plasticity of cortical neurons in the unaffected hemisphere. Significance: Non-invasive brain stimulation appears to assist cortical reorganization in post-stroke dysphagia but emerging factors highlight the need for more data.

KW - Dysphagia

KW - Non-invasive brain stimulation

KW - Post-stroke population

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

KW - Unilateral lesion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930599637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930599637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.069

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.069

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 956

EP - 968

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 1

ER -