Efficiency of Outpatient ECT

Rachel Dew, W. Vaughn McCall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficiency of acute-phase outpatient electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), maintenance ECT, and inpatient ECT regarding completion of scheduled treatments. Background: Psychiatric research suggests a trend toward greater use of outpatient ECT and that this modality may offer certain advantages over inpatient ECT. Possible concerns about outpatient ECT may be uncompleted treatments due to transportation problems, forgotten appointments, noncompliance with NPO status, or other variables more easily controlled in the inpatient setting. In addition, without the constant monitoring offered by the hospital setting, physicians prescribing outpatient ECT may less successfully gauge the number of required treatments. Methods: Completion rates of all scheduled ECTs in a tertiary care hospital setting were monitored prospectively for 8 months. Completed treatment totals were estimated by numbers of outpatient treatments billed for, institutional policy prohibiting charges for missed appointments. Outpatients scheduled for more than 1 treatment per week were considered acute-phase patients; maintenance therapy was defined as 1 or fewer treatments per week. Results: Of 257 scheduled outpatient maintenance treatments, 91% were completed compared with 65% of 456 scheduled inpatient treatments. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001; χ2 = 59.6; df = 1). Completion rate of acute outpatient treatments was 62% of 78 scheduled, showing a statistically significant difference from that of maintenance ECT (P < 0.0001; χ 2 = 39.1; df = 1). No significant difference was detected between the completion rates of inpatient and acute outpatient ECT. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the efficiency of maintenance ECT is high, comparing favorably with that of convulsive therapy for the acutely ill, and further support maintenance ECT as a useful and cost-effective modality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-25
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of ECT
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 26 2004

Fingerprint

Electroconvulsive Therapy
Outpatients
Inpatients
Maintenance
Therapeutics
Appointments and Schedules
Organizational Policy
Convulsive Therapy
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers
Psychiatry
Physicians

Keywords

  • Convulsive therapy
  • ECT
  • Psychiatric services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Efficiency of Outpatient ECT. / Dew, Rachel; McCall, W. Vaughn.

In: Journal of ECT, Vol. 20, No. 1, 26.04.2004, p. 24-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dew, Rachel ; McCall, W. Vaughn. / Efficiency of Outpatient ECT. In: Journal of ECT. 2004 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 24-25.
@article{dce7161aafad425da47b70a2cdd32ca4,
title = "Efficiency of Outpatient ECT",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the efficiency of acute-phase outpatient electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), maintenance ECT, and inpatient ECT regarding completion of scheduled treatments. Background: Psychiatric research suggests a trend toward greater use of outpatient ECT and that this modality may offer certain advantages over inpatient ECT. Possible concerns about outpatient ECT may be uncompleted treatments due to transportation problems, forgotten appointments, noncompliance with NPO status, or other variables more easily controlled in the inpatient setting. In addition, without the constant monitoring offered by the hospital setting, physicians prescribing outpatient ECT may less successfully gauge the number of required treatments. Methods: Completion rates of all scheduled ECTs in a tertiary care hospital setting were monitored prospectively for 8 months. Completed treatment totals were estimated by numbers of outpatient treatments billed for, institutional policy prohibiting charges for missed appointments. Outpatients scheduled for more than 1 treatment per week were considered acute-phase patients; maintenance therapy was defined as 1 or fewer treatments per week. Results: Of 257 scheduled outpatient maintenance treatments, 91{\%} were completed compared with 65{\%} of 456 scheduled inpatient treatments. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001; χ2 = 59.6; df = 1). Completion rate of acute outpatient treatments was 62{\%} of 78 scheduled, showing a statistically significant difference from that of maintenance ECT (P < 0.0001; χ 2 = 39.1; df = 1). No significant difference was detected between the completion rates of inpatient and acute outpatient ECT. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the efficiency of maintenance ECT is high, comparing favorably with that of convulsive therapy for the acutely ill, and further support maintenance ECT as a useful and cost-effective modality.",
keywords = "Convulsive therapy, ECT, Psychiatric services",
author = "Rachel Dew and McCall, {W. Vaughn}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1097/00124509-200403000-00006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "24--25",
journal = "Journal of ECT",
issn = "1095-0680",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency of Outpatient ECT

AU - Dew, Rachel

AU - McCall, W. Vaughn

PY - 2004/4/26

Y1 - 2004/4/26

N2 - Objective: To compare the efficiency of acute-phase outpatient electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), maintenance ECT, and inpatient ECT regarding completion of scheduled treatments. Background: Psychiatric research suggests a trend toward greater use of outpatient ECT and that this modality may offer certain advantages over inpatient ECT. Possible concerns about outpatient ECT may be uncompleted treatments due to transportation problems, forgotten appointments, noncompliance with NPO status, or other variables more easily controlled in the inpatient setting. In addition, without the constant monitoring offered by the hospital setting, physicians prescribing outpatient ECT may less successfully gauge the number of required treatments. Methods: Completion rates of all scheduled ECTs in a tertiary care hospital setting were monitored prospectively for 8 months. Completed treatment totals were estimated by numbers of outpatient treatments billed for, institutional policy prohibiting charges for missed appointments. Outpatients scheduled for more than 1 treatment per week were considered acute-phase patients; maintenance therapy was defined as 1 or fewer treatments per week. Results: Of 257 scheduled outpatient maintenance treatments, 91% were completed compared with 65% of 456 scheduled inpatient treatments. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001; χ2 = 59.6; df = 1). Completion rate of acute outpatient treatments was 62% of 78 scheduled, showing a statistically significant difference from that of maintenance ECT (P < 0.0001; χ 2 = 39.1; df = 1). No significant difference was detected between the completion rates of inpatient and acute outpatient ECT. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the efficiency of maintenance ECT is high, comparing favorably with that of convulsive therapy for the acutely ill, and further support maintenance ECT as a useful and cost-effective modality.

AB - Objective: To compare the efficiency of acute-phase outpatient electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), maintenance ECT, and inpatient ECT regarding completion of scheduled treatments. Background: Psychiatric research suggests a trend toward greater use of outpatient ECT and that this modality may offer certain advantages over inpatient ECT. Possible concerns about outpatient ECT may be uncompleted treatments due to transportation problems, forgotten appointments, noncompliance with NPO status, or other variables more easily controlled in the inpatient setting. In addition, without the constant monitoring offered by the hospital setting, physicians prescribing outpatient ECT may less successfully gauge the number of required treatments. Methods: Completion rates of all scheduled ECTs in a tertiary care hospital setting were monitored prospectively for 8 months. Completed treatment totals were estimated by numbers of outpatient treatments billed for, institutional policy prohibiting charges for missed appointments. Outpatients scheduled for more than 1 treatment per week were considered acute-phase patients; maintenance therapy was defined as 1 or fewer treatments per week. Results: Of 257 scheduled outpatient maintenance treatments, 91% were completed compared with 65% of 456 scheduled inpatient treatments. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001; χ2 = 59.6; df = 1). Completion rate of acute outpatient treatments was 62% of 78 scheduled, showing a statistically significant difference from that of maintenance ECT (P < 0.0001; χ 2 = 39.1; df = 1). No significant difference was detected between the completion rates of inpatient and acute outpatient ECT. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the efficiency of maintenance ECT is high, comparing favorably with that of convulsive therapy for the acutely ill, and further support maintenance ECT as a useful and cost-effective modality.

KW - Convulsive therapy

KW - ECT

KW - Psychiatric services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842633674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842633674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00124509-200403000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00124509-200403000-00006

M3 - Article

C2 - 15087993

AN - SCOPUS:1842633674

VL - 20

SP - 24

EP - 25

JO - Journal of ECT

JF - Journal of ECT

SN - 1095-0680

IS - 1

ER -