Electromyographic analysis of effort in grip strength assessment

B. R. Niebuhr, R. Marion, Scott Hasson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to investigate the use of surface EMG in assessing effort while measuring grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer. We hypothesized that sincere, maximal grip contractions could be distinguished from feigned, submaximal contractions by differences in the amplitude and frequeney content of the EMG, as well as by differences in force. Healthy subjects (seven men and ten women) were instructed on different trials to give a sincere (maximal, 100%) effort or a feigned (50% of maximal) effort with the right hand. The subjects were tested at each of the five handle positions of the Jamar dynamometer. Surface EMG was obtained for the right palmaris longus/flexor carpi radialis muscles. Consistent with previous research, we found that the 50% efforts, compared to 100% efforts, showed, (1) lower peak force, (2) a slower rise to peak force; and (3) a different pattern of force measurements as a function of handle position. Feigned and sincere efforts also differed in the EMG. As hypothesized, amplitude was lower for 50% than 100% efforts. The frequency spectra of the EMG were obtained by Fourier analysis. The 50% efforts showed a higher frequency EMG than did the 100%. The results supported the hypothesis that surface EMG may provide a measure of effort in a grip strength task. Analysis of the EMG, in conjunction with force analysis, has the potential of being a valuable tool for the elinician needing to determine whether a patient is giving a sincere, maximal effort or is feigning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-156
Number of pages8
JournalElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume33
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Hand Strength
Fourier Analysis
Research
Healthy Volunteers
Hand
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Electromyographic analysis of effort in grip strength assessment. / Niebuhr, B. R.; Marion, R.; Hasson, Scott.

In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 149-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niebuhr, BR, Marion, R & Hasson, S 1993, 'Electromyographic analysis of effort in grip strength assessment', Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 149-156.
Niebuhr, B. R. ; Marion, R. ; Hasson, Scott. / Electromyographic analysis of effort in grip strength assessment. In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1993 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 149-156.
@article{58396076cc7345bca8a0f8a7c7a0431e,
title = "Electromyographic analysis of effort in grip strength assessment",
abstract = "The purpose of the present research was to investigate the use of surface EMG in assessing effort while measuring grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer. We hypothesized that sincere, maximal grip contractions could be distinguished from feigned, submaximal contractions by differences in the amplitude and frequeney content of the EMG, as well as by differences in force. Healthy subjects (seven men and ten women) were instructed on different trials to give a sincere (maximal, 100{\%}) effort or a feigned (50{\%} of maximal) effort with the right hand. The subjects were tested at each of the five handle positions of the Jamar dynamometer. Surface EMG was obtained for the right palmaris longus/flexor carpi radialis muscles. Consistent with previous research, we found that the 50{\%} efforts, compared to 100{\%} efforts, showed, (1) lower peak force, (2) a slower rise to peak force; and (3) a different pattern of force measurements as a function of handle position. Feigned and sincere efforts also differed in the EMG. As hypothesized, amplitude was lower for 50{\%} than 100{\%} efforts. The frequency spectra of the EMG were obtained by Fourier analysis. The 50{\%} efforts showed a higher frequency EMG than did the 100{\%}. The results supported the hypothesis that surface EMG may provide a measure of effort in a grip strength task. Analysis of the EMG, in conjunction with force analysis, has the potential of being a valuable tool for the elinician needing to determine whether a patient is giving a sincere, maximal effort or is feigning.",
author = "Niebuhr, {B. R.} and R. Marion and Scott Hasson",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "149--156",
journal = "Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "0301-150X",
publisher = "Editions Nauwelaerts SA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electromyographic analysis of effort in grip strength assessment

AU - Niebuhr, B. R.

AU - Marion, R.

AU - Hasson, Scott

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - The purpose of the present research was to investigate the use of surface EMG in assessing effort while measuring grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer. We hypothesized that sincere, maximal grip contractions could be distinguished from feigned, submaximal contractions by differences in the amplitude and frequeney content of the EMG, as well as by differences in force. Healthy subjects (seven men and ten women) were instructed on different trials to give a sincere (maximal, 100%) effort or a feigned (50% of maximal) effort with the right hand. The subjects were tested at each of the five handle positions of the Jamar dynamometer. Surface EMG was obtained for the right palmaris longus/flexor carpi radialis muscles. Consistent with previous research, we found that the 50% efforts, compared to 100% efforts, showed, (1) lower peak force, (2) a slower rise to peak force; and (3) a different pattern of force measurements as a function of handle position. Feigned and sincere efforts also differed in the EMG. As hypothesized, amplitude was lower for 50% than 100% efforts. The frequency spectra of the EMG were obtained by Fourier analysis. The 50% efforts showed a higher frequency EMG than did the 100%. The results supported the hypothesis that surface EMG may provide a measure of effort in a grip strength task. Analysis of the EMG, in conjunction with force analysis, has the potential of being a valuable tool for the elinician needing to determine whether a patient is giving a sincere, maximal effort or is feigning.

AB - The purpose of the present research was to investigate the use of surface EMG in assessing effort while measuring grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer. We hypothesized that sincere, maximal grip contractions could be distinguished from feigned, submaximal contractions by differences in the amplitude and frequeney content of the EMG, as well as by differences in force. Healthy subjects (seven men and ten women) were instructed on different trials to give a sincere (maximal, 100%) effort or a feigned (50% of maximal) effort with the right hand. The subjects were tested at each of the five handle positions of the Jamar dynamometer. Surface EMG was obtained for the right palmaris longus/flexor carpi radialis muscles. Consistent with previous research, we found that the 50% efforts, compared to 100% efforts, showed, (1) lower peak force, (2) a slower rise to peak force; and (3) a different pattern of force measurements as a function of handle position. Feigned and sincere efforts also differed in the EMG. As hypothesized, amplitude was lower for 50% than 100% efforts. The frequency spectra of the EMG were obtained by Fourier analysis. The 50% efforts showed a higher frequency EMG than did the 100%. The results supported the hypothesis that surface EMG may provide a measure of effort in a grip strength task. Analysis of the EMG, in conjunction with force analysis, has the potential of being a valuable tool for the elinician needing to determine whether a patient is giving a sincere, maximal effort or is feigning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027155207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027155207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8495655

AN - SCOPUS:0027155207

VL - 33

SP - 149

EP - 156

JO - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 0301-150X

IS - 3

ER -