Electromyographic analysis of hip rehabilitation exercises in a group of healthy subjects

Lori Ann Bolgla, Timothy L. Uhl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Single-occasion, repeated-measures design. Objective: To determine the magnitude of hip abductor muscle activation during 6 rehabilitation exercises. Background: Many researchers have reported that hip strengthening, especially of the hip abductors, is an important component of a lower extremity rehabilitation program. Clinicians employ non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing exercise to strengthen the hip musculature; however, researchers have not examined relative differences in muscle activation during commonly used exercises. Information regarding these differences may provide clinicians with a scientific rationale needed for exercise prescription. Methods and Measures: Sixteen healthy subjects (mean ± SD age, 27 ± 5 years; range, 18-42 years; mean ± SD height, 1.7 ± 0.2 m; mean ± SD body mass, 76 ± 15 kg) volunteered for this study. Bipolar surface electrodes were applied to the right gluteus medius muscle. We measured muscle activation as subjects performed 3 non-weight-bearing (sidelying right hip abduction and standing right hip abduction with the hip at 0° and 20° of flexion) and 3 weight-bearing (left-sided pelvic drop and weight-bearing left hip abduction with the hips at 0° and 20° of flexion) exercises. Data were expressed as a percent of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the right gluteus medius. Differences in muscle activation across exercises were determined using a 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures, followed by a sequentially rejective Bonferroni post hoc analysis to identify differences between exercises. Results: The weight-bearing exercises demonstrated significantly greater EMG amplitudes (P<.001) than all non-weight-bearing exercises except non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction. Conclusion: The weight-bearing exercises and non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction exercise resulted in greater muscle activation because of the greater external torque applied to the hip abductor musculature. Although the non-weight-bearing standing hip abduction exercises required the least activation, they may benefit patients who cannot safely perform the weight-bearing or sidelying hip abduction exercises. Clinicians may use results from this study when designing hip rehabilitation programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-494
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise Therapy
Hip
Healthy Volunteers
Exercise
Weight-Bearing
Muscles
Rehabilitation
Research Personnel
Isometric Contraction
Torque

Keywords

  • Gluteus medius
  • Strengthening exercises
  • Surface EMG

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Electromyographic analysis of hip rehabilitation exercises in a group of healthy subjects. / Bolgla, Lori Ann; Uhl, Timothy L.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 35, No. 8, 01.01.2005, p. 487-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9a4dfd1c42447a6ba986d0f3aed611b,
title = "Electromyographic analysis of hip rehabilitation exercises in a group of healthy subjects",
abstract = "Study Design: Single-occasion, repeated-measures design. Objective: To determine the magnitude of hip abductor muscle activation during 6 rehabilitation exercises. Background: Many researchers have reported that hip strengthening, especially of the hip abductors, is an important component of a lower extremity rehabilitation program. Clinicians employ non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing exercise to strengthen the hip musculature; however, researchers have not examined relative differences in muscle activation during commonly used exercises. Information regarding these differences may provide clinicians with a scientific rationale needed for exercise prescription. Methods and Measures: Sixteen healthy subjects (mean ± SD age, 27 ± 5 years; range, 18-42 years; mean ± SD height, 1.7 ± 0.2 m; mean ± SD body mass, 76 ± 15 kg) volunteered for this study. Bipolar surface electrodes were applied to the right gluteus medius muscle. We measured muscle activation as subjects performed 3 non-weight-bearing (sidelying right hip abduction and standing right hip abduction with the hip at 0° and 20° of flexion) and 3 weight-bearing (left-sided pelvic drop and weight-bearing left hip abduction with the hips at 0° and 20° of flexion) exercises. Data were expressed as a percent of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the right gluteus medius. Differences in muscle activation across exercises were determined using a 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures, followed by a sequentially rejective Bonferroni post hoc analysis to identify differences between exercises. Results: The weight-bearing exercises demonstrated significantly greater EMG amplitudes (P<.001) than all non-weight-bearing exercises except non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction. Conclusion: The weight-bearing exercises and non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction exercise resulted in greater muscle activation because of the greater external torque applied to the hip abductor musculature. Although the non-weight-bearing standing hip abduction exercises required the least activation, they may benefit patients who cannot safely perform the weight-bearing or sidelying hip abduction exercises. Clinicians may use results from this study when designing hip rehabilitation programs.",
keywords = "Gluteus medius, Strengthening exercises, Surface EMG",
author = "Bolgla, {Lori Ann} and Uhl, {Timothy L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2519/jospt.2005.35.8.487",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "487--494",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy",
issn = "0190-6011",
publisher = "JOSPT",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electromyographic analysis of hip rehabilitation exercises in a group of healthy subjects

AU - Bolgla, Lori Ann

AU - Uhl, Timothy L.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Study Design: Single-occasion, repeated-measures design. Objective: To determine the magnitude of hip abductor muscle activation during 6 rehabilitation exercises. Background: Many researchers have reported that hip strengthening, especially of the hip abductors, is an important component of a lower extremity rehabilitation program. Clinicians employ non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing exercise to strengthen the hip musculature; however, researchers have not examined relative differences in muscle activation during commonly used exercises. Information regarding these differences may provide clinicians with a scientific rationale needed for exercise prescription. Methods and Measures: Sixteen healthy subjects (mean ± SD age, 27 ± 5 years; range, 18-42 years; mean ± SD height, 1.7 ± 0.2 m; mean ± SD body mass, 76 ± 15 kg) volunteered for this study. Bipolar surface electrodes were applied to the right gluteus medius muscle. We measured muscle activation as subjects performed 3 non-weight-bearing (sidelying right hip abduction and standing right hip abduction with the hip at 0° and 20° of flexion) and 3 weight-bearing (left-sided pelvic drop and weight-bearing left hip abduction with the hips at 0° and 20° of flexion) exercises. Data were expressed as a percent of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the right gluteus medius. Differences in muscle activation across exercises were determined using a 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures, followed by a sequentially rejective Bonferroni post hoc analysis to identify differences between exercises. Results: The weight-bearing exercises demonstrated significantly greater EMG amplitudes (P<.001) than all non-weight-bearing exercises except non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction. Conclusion: The weight-bearing exercises and non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction exercise resulted in greater muscle activation because of the greater external torque applied to the hip abductor musculature. Although the non-weight-bearing standing hip abduction exercises required the least activation, they may benefit patients who cannot safely perform the weight-bearing or sidelying hip abduction exercises. Clinicians may use results from this study when designing hip rehabilitation programs.

AB - Study Design: Single-occasion, repeated-measures design. Objective: To determine the magnitude of hip abductor muscle activation during 6 rehabilitation exercises. Background: Many researchers have reported that hip strengthening, especially of the hip abductors, is an important component of a lower extremity rehabilitation program. Clinicians employ non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing exercise to strengthen the hip musculature; however, researchers have not examined relative differences in muscle activation during commonly used exercises. Information regarding these differences may provide clinicians with a scientific rationale needed for exercise prescription. Methods and Measures: Sixteen healthy subjects (mean ± SD age, 27 ± 5 years; range, 18-42 years; mean ± SD height, 1.7 ± 0.2 m; mean ± SD body mass, 76 ± 15 kg) volunteered for this study. Bipolar surface electrodes were applied to the right gluteus medius muscle. We measured muscle activation as subjects performed 3 non-weight-bearing (sidelying right hip abduction and standing right hip abduction with the hip at 0° and 20° of flexion) and 3 weight-bearing (left-sided pelvic drop and weight-bearing left hip abduction with the hips at 0° and 20° of flexion) exercises. Data were expressed as a percent of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the right gluteus medius. Differences in muscle activation across exercises were determined using a 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures, followed by a sequentially rejective Bonferroni post hoc analysis to identify differences between exercises. Results: The weight-bearing exercises demonstrated significantly greater EMG amplitudes (P<.001) than all non-weight-bearing exercises except non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction. Conclusion: The weight-bearing exercises and non-weight-bearing sidelying hip abduction exercise resulted in greater muscle activation because of the greater external torque applied to the hip abductor musculature. Although the non-weight-bearing standing hip abduction exercises required the least activation, they may benefit patients who cannot safely perform the weight-bearing or sidelying hip abduction exercises. Clinicians may use results from this study when designing hip rehabilitation programs.

KW - Gluteus medius

KW - Strengthening exercises

KW - Surface EMG

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844554144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844554144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.8.487

DO - 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.8.487

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 487

EP - 494

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

SN - 0190-6011

IS - 8

ER -