Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions: effect of pain levels

John G. Arena, Richard A. Sherman, Glenda M. Bruno, Timothy R Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity recordings of bilateral paraspinal muscle tension were measured twice on 20 non-pain controls and on 46 low back pain subjects (21 individuals with intervertebral disk disorders and 25 subjects with unspecified musculoskeletal backache) during 6 positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported, and prone. Back pain subjects were measured during both low pain and high pain states. Results revealed a non-significant trend for all subjects, regardless of diagnosis, to have higher paraspinal muscle tension levels on the second (or high pain) assessment. A significant diagnosis by position interaction was observed which was similar to the interaction in our previous study which employed only a single measurement session. Analysis of simple main effects revealed this to be due to control subjects during the standing position having lower EMG levels than the back pain groups, and intervertebral disk disorder subjects having higher EMG levels than the other groups during the supported sitting position. As in our previous study, diagnosis was found to be a clinically significant factor, in that controls had much fewer clinically abnormal readings than back pain patients. The lack of a significant effect for pain state is congruent with findings in the headache literature. The importance of clearly defined diagnostic categories in low back pain research and the utility of measuring subjects in various positions is discussed, as are possible explanations for lack of significant pain state findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-28
Number of pages6
JournalPain
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Low Back Pain
Paraspinal Muscles
Pain
Muscle Tonus
Intervertebral Disc
Posture
Pain Measurement
Headache
Reading
Research

Keywords

  • EMG levels
  • Low back pain
  • Paraspinal muscle tension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions : effect of pain levels. / Arena, John G.; Sherman, Richard A.; Bruno, Glenda M.; Young, Timothy R.

In: Pain, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 23-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arena, John G. ; Sherman, Richard A. ; Bruno, Glenda M. ; Young, Timothy R. / Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions : effect of pain levels. In: Pain. 1991 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 23-28.
@article{6827e6b5caed456ab28cae9f88351016,
title = "Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions: effect of pain levels",
abstract = "Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity recordings of bilateral paraspinal muscle tension were measured twice on 20 non-pain controls and on 46 low back pain subjects (21 individuals with intervertebral disk disorders and 25 subjects with unspecified musculoskeletal backache) during 6 positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported, and prone. Back pain subjects were measured during both low pain and high pain states. Results revealed a non-significant trend for all subjects, regardless of diagnosis, to have higher paraspinal muscle tension levels on the second (or high pain) assessment. A significant diagnosis by position interaction was observed which was similar to the interaction in our previous study which employed only a single measurement session. Analysis of simple main effects revealed this to be due to control subjects during the standing position having lower EMG levels than the back pain groups, and intervertebral disk disorder subjects having higher EMG levels than the other groups during the supported sitting position. As in our previous study, diagnosis was found to be a clinically significant factor, in that controls had much fewer clinically abnormal readings than back pain patients. The lack of a significant effect for pain state is congruent with findings in the headache literature. The importance of clearly defined diagnostic categories in low back pain research and the utility of measuring subjects in various positions is discussed, as are possible explanations for lack of significant pain state findings.",
keywords = "EMG levels, Low back pain, Paraspinal muscle tension",
author = "Arena, {John G.} and Sherman, {Richard A.} and Bruno, {Glenda M.} and Young, {Timothy R}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0304-3959(91)90160-Y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "23--28",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions

T2 - effect of pain levels

AU - Arena, John G.

AU - Sherman, Richard A.

AU - Bruno, Glenda M.

AU - Young, Timothy R

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity recordings of bilateral paraspinal muscle tension were measured twice on 20 non-pain controls and on 46 low back pain subjects (21 individuals with intervertebral disk disorders and 25 subjects with unspecified musculoskeletal backache) during 6 positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported, and prone. Back pain subjects were measured during both low pain and high pain states. Results revealed a non-significant trend for all subjects, regardless of diagnosis, to have higher paraspinal muscle tension levels on the second (or high pain) assessment. A significant diagnosis by position interaction was observed which was similar to the interaction in our previous study which employed only a single measurement session. Analysis of simple main effects revealed this to be due to control subjects during the standing position having lower EMG levels than the back pain groups, and intervertebral disk disorder subjects having higher EMG levels than the other groups during the supported sitting position. As in our previous study, diagnosis was found to be a clinically significant factor, in that controls had much fewer clinically abnormal readings than back pain patients. The lack of a significant effect for pain state is congruent with findings in the headache literature. The importance of clearly defined diagnostic categories in low back pain research and the utility of measuring subjects in various positions is discussed, as are possible explanations for lack of significant pain state findings.

AB - Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity recordings of bilateral paraspinal muscle tension were measured twice on 20 non-pain controls and on 46 low back pain subjects (21 individuals with intervertebral disk disorders and 25 subjects with unspecified musculoskeletal backache) during 6 positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported, and prone. Back pain subjects were measured during both low pain and high pain states. Results revealed a non-significant trend for all subjects, regardless of diagnosis, to have higher paraspinal muscle tension levels on the second (or high pain) assessment. A significant diagnosis by position interaction was observed which was similar to the interaction in our previous study which employed only a single measurement session. Analysis of simple main effects revealed this to be due to control subjects during the standing position having lower EMG levels than the back pain groups, and intervertebral disk disorder subjects having higher EMG levels than the other groups during the supported sitting position. As in our previous study, diagnosis was found to be a clinically significant factor, in that controls had much fewer clinically abnormal readings than back pain patients. The lack of a significant effect for pain state is congruent with findings in the headache literature. The importance of clearly defined diagnostic categories in low back pain research and the utility of measuring subjects in various positions is discussed, as are possible explanations for lack of significant pain state findings.

KW - EMG levels

KW - Low back pain

KW - Paraspinal muscle tension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025756298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025756298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90160-Y

DO - 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90160-Y

M3 - Article

C2 - 1830645

AN - SCOPUS:0025756298

VL - 45

SP - 23

EP - 28

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 1

ER -