Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients

Larry Brannam, Michael Blaivas, Matthew L Lyon, Michael Flake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

118 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, emergency physicians have to obtain peripheral or central access. The authors describe the patient population for which ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral IVs are used and evaluate the success rates for such lines by ENs. This was a prospective observational study of ENs in a Level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement on difficult-to-stick patients (repeated blind IV placement failure or established history). ENs were trained on an inanimate model after a 45-minute lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded the reason for use of US, type of patient, and success. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and flushing fluids. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluated data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a five-month period no ENs declined to participate. There were 280 (87%) successful attempts. Twelve (29%) of the 41 failure patients required central lines, 9 (22%) received external jugular IVs, and 20 (49%) had peripheral IV access placed under US guidance by another nurse or physician. Twenty-eight percent (90) of all patients were obese, 18% (57) had sickle cell anemia, 10% (31) were renal dialysis patients, 12% (40) were IV drug abusers, and 19% (61) had unspecified chronic illness. The remainder had no reason for difficult access given. There were four arterial punctures. ENs had a high success rate and few complications with use of US guidance for vascular access in a variety of difficult-access patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1361-1363
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004

Fingerprint

Emergencies
Nurses
Physicians
Trauma Centers
Sickle Cell Anemia
Censuses
Drug Users
Punctures
Catheterization
Observational Studies
Blood Vessels
Renal Dialysis
Chronic Disease
Neck
History
Prospective Studies
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • emergency medicine
  • emergency nurse education
  • emergency ultrasound
  • ultrasound
  • ultrasound education
  • ultrasound-assisted line placement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. / Brannam, Larry; Blaivas, Michael; Lyon, Matthew L; Flake, Michael.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 12, 01.12.2004, p. 1361-1363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbab5a3c403140a59061b3a2806b0894,
title = "Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients",
abstract = "Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, emergency physicians have to obtain peripheral or central access. The authors describe the patient population for which ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral IVs are used and evaluate the success rates for such lines by ENs. This was a prospective observational study of ENs in a Level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement on difficult-to-stick patients (repeated blind IV placement failure or established history). ENs were trained on an inanimate model after a 45-minute lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded the reason for use of US, type of patient, and success. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and flushing fluids. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluated data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a five-month period no ENs declined to participate. There were 280 (87{\%}) successful attempts. Twelve (29{\%}) of the 41 failure patients required central lines, 9 (22{\%}) received external jugular IVs, and 20 (49{\%}) had peripheral IV access placed under US guidance by another nurse or physician. Twenty-eight percent (90) of all patients were obese, 18{\%} (57) had sickle cell anemia, 10{\%} (31) were renal dialysis patients, 12{\%} (40) were IV drug abusers, and 19{\%} (61) had unspecified chronic illness. The remainder had no reason for difficult access given. There were four arterial punctures. ENs had a high success rate and few complications with use of US guidance for vascular access in a variety of difficult-access patients.",
keywords = "emergency medicine, emergency nurse education, emergency ultrasound, ultrasound, ultrasound education, ultrasound-assisted line placement",
author = "Larry Brannam and Michael Blaivas and Lyon, {Matthew L} and Michael Flake",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "1361--1363",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients

AU - Brannam, Larry

AU - Blaivas, Michael

AU - Lyon, Matthew L

AU - Flake, Michael

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, emergency physicians have to obtain peripheral or central access. The authors describe the patient population for which ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral IVs are used and evaluate the success rates for such lines by ENs. This was a prospective observational study of ENs in a Level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement on difficult-to-stick patients (repeated blind IV placement failure or established history). ENs were trained on an inanimate model after a 45-minute lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded the reason for use of US, type of patient, and success. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and flushing fluids. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluated data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a five-month period no ENs declined to participate. There were 280 (87%) successful attempts. Twelve (29%) of the 41 failure patients required central lines, 9 (22%) received external jugular IVs, and 20 (49%) had peripheral IV access placed under US guidance by another nurse or physician. Twenty-eight percent (90) of all patients were obese, 18% (57) had sickle cell anemia, 10% (31) were renal dialysis patients, 12% (40) were IV drug abusers, and 19% (61) had unspecified chronic illness. The remainder had no reason for difficult access given. There were four arterial punctures. ENs had a high success rate and few complications with use of US guidance for vascular access in a variety of difficult-access patients.

AB - Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, emergency physicians have to obtain peripheral or central access. The authors describe the patient population for which ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral IVs are used and evaluate the success rates for such lines by ENs. This was a prospective observational study of ENs in a Level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement on difficult-to-stick patients (repeated blind IV placement failure or established history). ENs were trained on an inanimate model after a 45-minute lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded the reason for use of US, type of patient, and success. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and flushing fluids. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluated data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a five-month period no ENs declined to participate. There were 280 (87%) successful attempts. Twelve (29%) of the 41 failure patients required central lines, 9 (22%) received external jugular IVs, and 20 (49%) had peripheral IV access placed under US guidance by another nurse or physician. Twenty-eight percent (90) of all patients were obese, 18% (57) had sickle cell anemia, 10% (31) were renal dialysis patients, 12% (40) were IV drug abusers, and 19% (61) had unspecified chronic illness. The remainder had no reason for difficult access given. There were four arterial punctures. ENs had a high success rate and few complications with use of US guidance for vascular access in a variety of difficult-access patients.

KW - emergency medicine

KW - emergency nurse education

KW - emergency ultrasound

KW - ultrasound

KW - ultrasound education

KW - ultrasound-assisted line placement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9644287898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9644287898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.027

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.027

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1361

EP - 1363

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 12

ER -