Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants

Stacey L. Halum, Gregory N. Postma, Jamie A. Koufman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Medialization laryngoplasty (ML) is a commonly performed procedure for vocal fold motion impairment with glottic incompetence. Although implant extrusion is a well-known risk of ML, management of this complication is rarely mentioned in the literature. The aim of this study was to review our experience with endoscopic implant retrieval for a group of patients with extruding ML implants. Methods: All patients identified in our institution from January 1989 through August 2004 with a history of ML and extruded implants were identified. Case management was reviewed, including information on presentation, management techniques, and outcomes. Results: Five patients presented with extruding ML (Gore-Tex [n = 2] or silastic [n = 3]) implants. All patients presented with worsening dysphonia and evidence of fullness and/or granulation tissue at the extrusion site. Endoscopic removal was performed using either sharp dissection or CO2 laser dissection. After removal, four patients underwent vocal fold injection augmentation. Conclusions: Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe, effective, and even preferred alternative to external transcervical removal in selected cases of extruding implants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1051-1054
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume115
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2005

Fingerprint

Laryngoplasty
Vocal Cords
Dissection
Dysphonia
Gas Lasers
Granulation Tissue
Case Management
Tongue
Injections

Keywords

  • Endoscopic management
  • Implant extrusion
  • Medialization laryngoplasty
  • Thyroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants. / Halum, Stacey L.; Postma, Gregory N.; Koufman, Jamie A.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 115, No. 6, 01.06.2005, p. 1051-1054.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Halum, Stacey L. ; Postma, Gregory N. ; Koufman, Jamie A. / Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants. In: Laryngoscope. 2005 ; Vol. 115, No. 6. pp. 1051-1054.
@article{1d023d662492445bb8213a98daceaa3d,
title = "Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants",
abstract = "Background: Medialization laryngoplasty (ML) is a commonly performed procedure for vocal fold motion impairment with glottic incompetence. Although implant extrusion is a well-known risk of ML, management of this complication is rarely mentioned in the literature. The aim of this study was to review our experience with endoscopic implant retrieval for a group of patients with extruding ML implants. Methods: All patients identified in our institution from January 1989 through August 2004 with a history of ML and extruded implants were identified. Case management was reviewed, including information on presentation, management techniques, and outcomes. Results: Five patients presented with extruding ML (Gore-Tex [n = 2] or silastic [n = 3]) implants. All patients presented with worsening dysphonia and evidence of fullness and/or granulation tissue at the extrusion site. Endoscopic removal was performed using either sharp dissection or CO2 laser dissection. After removal, four patients underwent vocal fold injection augmentation. Conclusions: Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe, effective, and even preferred alternative to external transcervical removal in selected cases of extruding implants.",
keywords = "Endoscopic management, Implant extrusion, Medialization laryngoplasty, Thyroplasty",
author = "Halum, {Stacey L.} and Postma, {Gregory N.} and Koufman, {Jamie A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.MLG.0000163342.10412.EB",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "1051--1054",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants

AU - Halum, Stacey L.

AU - Postma, Gregory N.

AU - Koufman, Jamie A.

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - Background: Medialization laryngoplasty (ML) is a commonly performed procedure for vocal fold motion impairment with glottic incompetence. Although implant extrusion is a well-known risk of ML, management of this complication is rarely mentioned in the literature. The aim of this study was to review our experience with endoscopic implant retrieval for a group of patients with extruding ML implants. Methods: All patients identified in our institution from January 1989 through August 2004 with a history of ML and extruded implants were identified. Case management was reviewed, including information on presentation, management techniques, and outcomes. Results: Five patients presented with extruding ML (Gore-Tex [n = 2] or silastic [n = 3]) implants. All patients presented with worsening dysphonia and evidence of fullness and/or granulation tissue at the extrusion site. Endoscopic removal was performed using either sharp dissection or CO2 laser dissection. After removal, four patients underwent vocal fold injection augmentation. Conclusions: Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe, effective, and even preferred alternative to external transcervical removal in selected cases of extruding implants.

AB - Background: Medialization laryngoplasty (ML) is a commonly performed procedure for vocal fold motion impairment with glottic incompetence. Although implant extrusion is a well-known risk of ML, management of this complication is rarely mentioned in the literature. The aim of this study was to review our experience with endoscopic implant retrieval for a group of patients with extruding ML implants. Methods: All patients identified in our institution from January 1989 through August 2004 with a history of ML and extruded implants were identified. Case management was reviewed, including information on presentation, management techniques, and outcomes. Results: Five patients presented with extruding ML (Gore-Tex [n = 2] or silastic [n = 3]) implants. All patients presented with worsening dysphonia and evidence of fullness and/or granulation tissue at the extrusion site. Endoscopic removal was performed using either sharp dissection or CO2 laser dissection. After removal, four patients underwent vocal fold injection augmentation. Conclusions: Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe, effective, and even preferred alternative to external transcervical removal in selected cases of extruding implants.

KW - Endoscopic management

KW - Implant extrusion

KW - Medialization laryngoplasty

KW - Thyroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20144362864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20144362864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163342.10412.EB

DO - 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163342.10412.EB

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15933519

AN - SCOPUS:20144362864

VL - 115

SP - 1051

EP - 1054

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 6

ER -