Environmental impact of ongoing sources of metal contamination on remediated sediments

Anna Sophia Knox, Michael H Paller, Charles E. Milliken, Todd M. Redder, John R. Wolfe, John Seaman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A challenge to all remedial approaches for contaminated sediments is the continued influx of contaminants from uncontrolled sources following remediation. We investigated the effects of ongoing contamination in mesocosms employing sediments remediated by different types of active and passive caps and in-situ treatment. Our hypothesis was that the sequestering agents used in active caps and in situ treatment will bind elements (arsenic, chromium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, nickel, lead, selenium, and zinc) from ongoing sources thereby reducing their bioavailability and protecting underlying remediated sediments from recontamination. Most element concentrations in surface water remained significantly lower in mesocosms with apatite and mixed amendment caps than in mesocosms with passive caps (sand), uncapped sediment, and spike solution throughout the 2520 h experiment. Element concentrations were significantly higher in Lumbriculus variegatus from untreated sediment than in Lumbriculus from most active caps. Pearson correlations between element concentrations in Lumbriculus and metal concentrations in the top 2.5 cm of sediment or cap measured by diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) sediment probes were generally strong (as high as 0.98) and significant (p < 0.05) for almost all tested elements. Metal concentrations in both Lumbriculus and sediment/cap were lowest in apatite, mixed amendment, and activated carbon treatments. These findings show that some active caps can protect remediated sediments by reducing the bioavailable pool of metals/metalloids in ongoing sources of contamination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-117
Number of pages10
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume563-564
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Environmental impact
Sediments
Contamination
environmental impact
Metals
metal
sediment
Apatites
Apatite
Chemical elements
apatite
Sequestering Agents
Activated carbon treatment
Metalloids
contamination
Selenium
Arsenic
Chromium
Cobalt
Nickel

Keywords

  • Active caps
  • Bioavailability
  • Metals
  • Passive caps
  • Re-contamination
  • Remediated sediment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

Knox, A. S., Paller, M. H., Milliken, C. E., Redder, T. M., Wolfe, J. R., & Seaman, J. (2016). Environmental impact of ongoing sources of metal contamination on remediated sediments. Science of the Total Environment, 563-564, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.050

Environmental impact of ongoing sources of metal contamination on remediated sediments. / Knox, Anna Sophia; Paller, Michael H; Milliken, Charles E.; Redder, Todd M.; Wolfe, John R.; Seaman, John.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 563-564, 01.09.2016, p. 108-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Knox, Anna Sophia ; Paller, Michael H ; Milliken, Charles E. ; Redder, Todd M. ; Wolfe, John R. ; Seaman, John. / Environmental impact of ongoing sources of metal contamination on remediated sediments. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2016 ; Vol. 563-564. pp. 108-117.
@article{381539231272466eac800360fd7907e7,
title = "Environmental impact of ongoing sources of metal contamination on remediated sediments",
abstract = "A challenge to all remedial approaches for contaminated sediments is the continued influx of contaminants from uncontrolled sources following remediation. We investigated the effects of ongoing contamination in mesocosms employing sediments remediated by different types of active and passive caps and in-situ treatment. Our hypothesis was that the sequestering agents used in active caps and in situ treatment will bind elements (arsenic, chromium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, nickel, lead, selenium, and zinc) from ongoing sources thereby reducing their bioavailability and protecting underlying remediated sediments from recontamination. Most element concentrations in surface water remained significantly lower in mesocosms with apatite and mixed amendment caps than in mesocosms with passive caps (sand), uncapped sediment, and spike solution throughout the 2520 h experiment. Element concentrations were significantly higher in Lumbriculus variegatus from untreated sediment than in Lumbriculus from most active caps. Pearson correlations between element concentrations in Lumbriculus and metal concentrations in the top 2.5 cm of sediment or cap measured by diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) sediment probes were generally strong (as high as 0.98) and significant (p < 0.05) for almost all tested elements. Metal concentrations in both Lumbriculus and sediment/cap were lowest in apatite, mixed amendment, and activated carbon treatments. These findings show that some active caps can protect remediated sediments by reducing the bioavailable pool of metals/metalloids in ongoing sources of contamination.",
keywords = "Active caps, Bioavailability, Metals, Passive caps, Re-contamination, Remediated sediment",
author = "Knox, {Anna Sophia} and Paller, {Michael H} and Milliken, {Charles E.} and Redder, {Todd M.} and Wolfe, {John R.} and John Seaman",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "563-564",
pages = "108--117",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental impact of ongoing sources of metal contamination on remediated sediments

AU - Knox, Anna Sophia

AU - Paller, Michael H

AU - Milliken, Charles E.

AU - Redder, Todd M.

AU - Wolfe, John R.

AU - Seaman, John

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - A challenge to all remedial approaches for contaminated sediments is the continued influx of contaminants from uncontrolled sources following remediation. We investigated the effects of ongoing contamination in mesocosms employing sediments remediated by different types of active and passive caps and in-situ treatment. Our hypothesis was that the sequestering agents used in active caps and in situ treatment will bind elements (arsenic, chromium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, nickel, lead, selenium, and zinc) from ongoing sources thereby reducing their bioavailability and protecting underlying remediated sediments from recontamination. Most element concentrations in surface water remained significantly lower in mesocosms with apatite and mixed amendment caps than in mesocosms with passive caps (sand), uncapped sediment, and spike solution throughout the 2520 h experiment. Element concentrations were significantly higher in Lumbriculus variegatus from untreated sediment than in Lumbriculus from most active caps. Pearson correlations between element concentrations in Lumbriculus and metal concentrations in the top 2.5 cm of sediment or cap measured by diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) sediment probes were generally strong (as high as 0.98) and significant (p < 0.05) for almost all tested elements. Metal concentrations in both Lumbriculus and sediment/cap were lowest in apatite, mixed amendment, and activated carbon treatments. These findings show that some active caps can protect remediated sediments by reducing the bioavailable pool of metals/metalloids in ongoing sources of contamination.

AB - A challenge to all remedial approaches for contaminated sediments is the continued influx of contaminants from uncontrolled sources following remediation. We investigated the effects of ongoing contamination in mesocosms employing sediments remediated by different types of active and passive caps and in-situ treatment. Our hypothesis was that the sequestering agents used in active caps and in situ treatment will bind elements (arsenic, chromium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, nickel, lead, selenium, and zinc) from ongoing sources thereby reducing their bioavailability and protecting underlying remediated sediments from recontamination. Most element concentrations in surface water remained significantly lower in mesocosms with apatite and mixed amendment caps than in mesocosms with passive caps (sand), uncapped sediment, and spike solution throughout the 2520 h experiment. Element concentrations were significantly higher in Lumbriculus variegatus from untreated sediment than in Lumbriculus from most active caps. Pearson correlations between element concentrations in Lumbriculus and metal concentrations in the top 2.5 cm of sediment or cap measured by diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) sediment probes were generally strong (as high as 0.98) and significant (p < 0.05) for almost all tested elements. Metal concentrations in both Lumbriculus and sediment/cap were lowest in apatite, mixed amendment, and activated carbon treatments. These findings show that some active caps can protect remediated sediments by reducing the bioavailable pool of metals/metalloids in ongoing sources of contamination.

KW - Active caps

KW - Bioavailability

KW - Metals

KW - Passive caps

KW - Re-contamination

KW - Remediated sediment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964556458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964556458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.050

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.050

M3 - Article

VL - 563-564

SP - 108

EP - 117

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -