Ependymal cell contribution to scar formation after spinal cord injury is minimal, local and dependent on direct ependymal injury

Yilong Ren, Yan Ao, Timothy M. O'Shea, Joshua E. Burda, Alexander M. Bernstein, Andrew J. Brumm, Nagendran Muthusamy, H. Troy Ghashghaei, S. Thomas Carmichael, Liming Cheng, Michael V. Sofroniew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ependyma have been proposed as adult neural stem cells that provide the majority of newly proliferated scar-forming astrocytes that protect tissue and function after spinal cord injury (SCI). This proposal was based on small, midline stab SCI. Here, we tested the generality of this proposal by using a genetic knock-in cell fate mapping strategy in different murine SCI models. After large crush injuries across the entire spinal cord, ependyma-derived progeny remained local, did not migrate and contributed few cells of any kind and less than 2%, if any, of the total newly proliferated and molecularly confirmed scar-forming astrocytes. Stab injuries that were near to but did not directly damage ependyma, contained no ependyma-derived cells. Our findings show that ependymal contribution of progeny after SCI is minimal, local and dependent on direct ependymal injury, indicating that ependyma are not a major source of endogenous neural stem cells or neuroprotective astrocytes after SCI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number41122
JournalScientific reports
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ependymal cell contribution to scar formation after spinal cord injury is minimal, local and dependent on direct ependymal injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this