Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns - Are all your epilepsy patients controlled?

Selim R. Benbadis, Leanne Heriaud, William O. Tatum IV, Fernando Vale Diaz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Epilepsy surgery is a standard of care in the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy, but is underutilised. We describe the results of epilepsy surgery and the referral patterns at a referral epilepsy programme. Methods: We reviewed the outcome of epilepsy surgery performed at the University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital epilepsy programme for the years 2000 and 2001. The typical presurgical evaluation included clinical evaluation, EEG-video monitoring, MRI with dedicated epilepsy protocol, PET, SPECT, neuropsychological testing and Wada testing. We used the Engel outcome classification, and focused on the referral information to determine how and when in the course of their illness patients arrive at a referral epilepsy centre. Results: In the 2-year period (2000-2001), a total of 36 epilepsy surgeries were performed. Twenty-nine temporal lobectomies, six extratemporal resections and one corpus callosotomy. Ages varied from 17 to 65 years. Overall results were: 30 (83%) seizure-free [class I], 5 (17%) rare seizures or almost seizure-free [class II] and 1 no improvement. Of the 29 temporal lobectomies, 27 (93%) are completely seizure-free [class I] and 2 (7%) are >90% improved [class II]. Duration of seizures before being seen at the epilepsy centre averaged 18 years (range 2-58 years). Twenty-two (61%) were sent by their neurologists, while 14 (39%) came self-referred without having discussed surgery with their neurologists. Five (14%) were specifically advised by their neurologist to not consider surgery. Two had participated in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) before being seen at the epilepsy centre. Conclusions: Epilepsy surgery has high efficacy and very low morbidity. Yet, there continues to be a long delay in the referral of patients to the epilepsy centre, suggesting that surgery for epilepsy is underutilised.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-170
Number of pages4
JournalSeizure
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Referral and Consultation
Seizures
Standard of Care
Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
General Hospitals
Anticonvulsants
Electroencephalography
Clinical Trials
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Antiepileptic drugs
  • Drug trials
  • Epilepsy surgery
  • Intractable seizures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns - Are all your epilepsy patients controlled? / Benbadis, Selim R.; Heriaud, Leanne; Tatum IV, William O.; Vale Diaz, Fernando.

In: Seizure, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.01.2003, p. 167-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Benbadis, Selim R. ; Heriaud, Leanne ; Tatum IV, William O. ; Vale Diaz, Fernando. / Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns - Are all your epilepsy patients controlled?. In: Seizure. 2003 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 167-170.
@article{309e53d5e5104e09870fda9794df77ec,
title = "Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns - Are all your epilepsy patients controlled?",
abstract = "Rationale: Epilepsy surgery is a standard of care in the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy, but is underutilised. We describe the results of epilepsy surgery and the referral patterns at a referral epilepsy programme. Methods: We reviewed the outcome of epilepsy surgery performed at the University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital epilepsy programme for the years 2000 and 2001. The typical presurgical evaluation included clinical evaluation, EEG-video monitoring, MRI with dedicated epilepsy protocol, PET, SPECT, neuropsychological testing and Wada testing. We used the Engel outcome classification, and focused on the referral information to determine how and when in the course of their illness patients arrive at a referral epilepsy centre. Results: In the 2-year period (2000-2001), a total of 36 epilepsy surgeries were performed. Twenty-nine temporal lobectomies, six extratemporal resections and one corpus callosotomy. Ages varied from 17 to 65 years. Overall results were: 30 (83{\%}) seizure-free [class I], 5 (17{\%}) rare seizures or almost seizure-free [class II] and 1 no improvement. Of the 29 temporal lobectomies, 27 (93{\%}) are completely seizure-free [class I] and 2 (7{\%}) are >90{\%} improved [class II]. Duration of seizures before being seen at the epilepsy centre averaged 18 years (range 2-58 years). Twenty-two (61{\%}) were sent by their neurologists, while 14 (39{\%}) came self-referred without having discussed surgery with their neurologists. Five (14{\%}) were specifically advised by their neurologist to not consider surgery. Two had participated in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) before being seen at the epilepsy centre. Conclusions: Epilepsy surgery has high efficacy and very low morbidity. Yet, there continues to be a long delay in the referral of patients to the epilepsy centre, suggesting that surgery for epilepsy is underutilised.",
keywords = "Antiepileptic drugs, Drug trials, Epilepsy surgery, Intractable seizures",
author = "Benbadis, {Selim R.} and Leanne Heriaud and {Tatum IV}, {William O.} and {Vale Diaz}, Fernando",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1059-1311(02)00320-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "167--170",
journal = "Seizure : the journal of the British Epilepsy Association",
issn = "1059-1311",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns - Are all your epilepsy patients controlled?

AU - Benbadis, Selim R.

AU - Heriaud, Leanne

AU - Tatum IV, William O.

AU - Vale Diaz, Fernando

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Rationale: Epilepsy surgery is a standard of care in the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy, but is underutilised. We describe the results of epilepsy surgery and the referral patterns at a referral epilepsy programme. Methods: We reviewed the outcome of epilepsy surgery performed at the University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital epilepsy programme for the years 2000 and 2001. The typical presurgical evaluation included clinical evaluation, EEG-video monitoring, MRI with dedicated epilepsy protocol, PET, SPECT, neuropsychological testing and Wada testing. We used the Engel outcome classification, and focused on the referral information to determine how and when in the course of their illness patients arrive at a referral epilepsy centre. Results: In the 2-year period (2000-2001), a total of 36 epilepsy surgeries were performed. Twenty-nine temporal lobectomies, six extratemporal resections and one corpus callosotomy. Ages varied from 17 to 65 years. Overall results were: 30 (83%) seizure-free [class I], 5 (17%) rare seizures or almost seizure-free [class II] and 1 no improvement. Of the 29 temporal lobectomies, 27 (93%) are completely seizure-free [class I] and 2 (7%) are >90% improved [class II]. Duration of seizures before being seen at the epilepsy centre averaged 18 years (range 2-58 years). Twenty-two (61%) were sent by their neurologists, while 14 (39%) came self-referred without having discussed surgery with their neurologists. Five (14%) were specifically advised by their neurologist to not consider surgery. Two had participated in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) before being seen at the epilepsy centre. Conclusions: Epilepsy surgery has high efficacy and very low morbidity. Yet, there continues to be a long delay in the referral of patients to the epilepsy centre, suggesting that surgery for epilepsy is underutilised.

AB - Rationale: Epilepsy surgery is a standard of care in the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy, but is underutilised. We describe the results of epilepsy surgery and the referral patterns at a referral epilepsy programme. Methods: We reviewed the outcome of epilepsy surgery performed at the University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital epilepsy programme for the years 2000 and 2001. The typical presurgical evaluation included clinical evaluation, EEG-video monitoring, MRI with dedicated epilepsy protocol, PET, SPECT, neuropsychological testing and Wada testing. We used the Engel outcome classification, and focused on the referral information to determine how and when in the course of their illness patients arrive at a referral epilepsy centre. Results: In the 2-year period (2000-2001), a total of 36 epilepsy surgeries were performed. Twenty-nine temporal lobectomies, six extratemporal resections and one corpus callosotomy. Ages varied from 17 to 65 years. Overall results were: 30 (83%) seizure-free [class I], 5 (17%) rare seizures or almost seizure-free [class II] and 1 no improvement. Of the 29 temporal lobectomies, 27 (93%) are completely seizure-free [class I] and 2 (7%) are >90% improved [class II]. Duration of seizures before being seen at the epilepsy centre averaged 18 years (range 2-58 years). Twenty-two (61%) were sent by their neurologists, while 14 (39%) came self-referred without having discussed surgery with their neurologists. Five (14%) were specifically advised by their neurologist to not consider surgery. Two had participated in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) before being seen at the epilepsy centre. Conclusions: Epilepsy surgery has high efficacy and very low morbidity. Yet, there continues to be a long delay in the referral of patients to the epilepsy centre, suggesting that surgery for epilepsy is underutilised.

KW - Antiepileptic drugs

KW - Drug trials

KW - Epilepsy surgery

KW - Intractable seizures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037389721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037389721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1059-1311(02)00320-5

DO - 10.1016/S1059-1311(02)00320-5

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 167

EP - 170

JO - Seizure : the journal of the British Epilepsy Association

JF - Seizure : the journal of the British Epilepsy Association

SN - 1059-1311

IS - 3

ER -