Ethics, scientific validity, and the design of epidemiologic studies

Steven S. Coughlin, Tom L. Beauchamp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ethical conflicts between moral principles and methodologic standards sometimes occur in epidemiologic research. When dilemmas are discerned, they may be analyzed using the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and respect for the autonomy of persons. We argue that, in addition to scientific validity, the welfare and rights of research subjects should be taken into account in making decisions regarding all aspects of the design and conduct of epidemiologic studies, and that the commitment of epidemiologists to the advancement of scientific knowledge should not outweigh or override all other considerations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-347
Number of pages5
JournalEpidemiology
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Bioethics
  • Case-control studies
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Gender
  • Proxy respondents
  • Race
  • Social class
  • Study design
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics, scientific validity, and the design of epidemiologic studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this