Ethics, scientific validity, and the design of epidemiologic studies

Steven Scott Coughlin, Tom L. Beauchamp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ethical conflicts between moral principles and methodologic standards sometimes occur in epidemiologic research. When dilemmas are discerned, they may be analyzed using the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and respect for the autonomy of persons. We argue that, in addition to scientific validity, the welfare and rights of research subjects should be taken into account in making decisions regarding all aspects of the design and conduct of epidemiologic studies, and that the commitment of epidemiologists to the advancement of scientific knowledge should not outweigh or override all other considerations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-347
Number of pages5
JournalEpidemiology
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Beneficence
Ethics
Epidemiologic Studies
Research Subjects
Social Justice
Decision Making
Research
Conflict (Psychology)
Epidemiologists

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Bioethics
  • Case-control studies
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Gender
  • Proxy respondents
  • Race
  • Social class
  • Study design
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Ethics, scientific validity, and the design of epidemiologic studies. / Coughlin, Steven Scott; Beauchamp, Tom L.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 01.01.1992, p. 343-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b6da4d43e0f34271a107441f7ea7c7ea,
title = "Ethics, scientific validity, and the design of epidemiologic studies",
abstract = "Ethical conflicts between moral principles and methodologic standards sometimes occur in epidemiologic research. When dilemmas are discerned, they may be analyzed using the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and respect for the autonomy of persons. We argue that, in addition to scientific validity, the welfare and rights of research subjects should be taken into account in making decisions regarding all aspects of the design and conduct of epidemiologic studies, and that the commitment of epidemiologists to the advancement of scientific knowledge should not outweigh or override all other considerations.",
keywords = "Bias, Bioethics, Case-control studies, Epidemiologic methods, Gender, Proxy respondents, Race, Social class, Study design, Validity",
author = "Coughlin, {Steven Scott} and Beauchamp, {Tom L.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00001648-199207000-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "343--347",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics, scientific validity, and the design of epidemiologic studies

AU - Coughlin, Steven Scott

AU - Beauchamp, Tom L.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Ethical conflicts between moral principles and methodologic standards sometimes occur in epidemiologic research. When dilemmas are discerned, they may be analyzed using the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and respect for the autonomy of persons. We argue that, in addition to scientific validity, the welfare and rights of research subjects should be taken into account in making decisions regarding all aspects of the design and conduct of epidemiologic studies, and that the commitment of epidemiologists to the advancement of scientific knowledge should not outweigh or override all other considerations.

AB - Ethical conflicts between moral principles and methodologic standards sometimes occur in epidemiologic research. When dilemmas are discerned, they may be analyzed using the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and respect for the autonomy of persons. We argue that, in addition to scientific validity, the welfare and rights of research subjects should be taken into account in making decisions regarding all aspects of the design and conduct of epidemiologic studies, and that the commitment of epidemiologists to the advancement of scientific knowledge should not outweigh or override all other considerations.

KW - Bias

KW - Bioethics

KW - Case-control studies

KW - Epidemiologic methods

KW - Gender

KW - Proxy respondents

KW - Race

KW - Social class

KW - Study design

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026687555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026687555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001648-199207000-00009

DO - 10.1097/00001648-199207000-00009

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 343

EP - 347

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 4

ER -