Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen

Michael R. Johnson, Abraham G. Hartzema, Terry L. Mills, Jessica M. De Leon, Mark Yang, Christopher Frueh, Alberto Santos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of the Brief Panic Disorder Screen (BPDS) in samples of African American and Caucasian American primary care patients. Methods. The BPDS was administered to 295 patients scheduled to visit a primary care clinic for medical reasons. The presence or absence of a panic disorder diagnosis was established during a clinical interview with a psychiatrist. Measures of reliability (internal consistency) and validity (criterion validity) were compared between the two ethnic subgroups. Findings. The BPDS demonstrated greater reliability and validity for Caucasians than African Americans. This effect was maintained even after controlling for group differences in key demographic variables. Differences between ethnic groups were apparent in both those with and those without panic disorder (PD). BPDS responses of African Americans with PD demonstrated very low internal consistency whereas a high rate of false positive PD diagnoses was related to higher than expected BPDS scores among African Americans without PD, particularly on the level of fear felt when experiencing shortness of breath or heart palpitations. Discussion. These findings support the notion that cultural differences in the language and meaning associated with anxiety disorders contribute to the difficulty of accurately diagnosing PD in primary care populations. Additional research is needed to provide a better understanding of the cultural aspects of the anxiety experience. Such research would facilitate the development of better screening tools for panic and other anxiety disorders for ethnic minority primary care populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-296
Number of pages14
JournalEthnicity and Health
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Panic Disorder
Reproducibility of Results
anxiety
Caucasian
African Americans
Primary Health Care
psychiatrist
cultural difference
patient care
national minority
ethnic group
Anxiety Disorders
American
Panic
interview
language
experience
Group
Ethnic Groups
Research

Keywords

  • African Americans
  • Panic Disorder
  • Primary Care
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Johnson, M. R., Hartzema, A. G., Mills, T. L., De Leon, J. M., Yang, M., Frueh, C., & Santos, A. (2007). Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen. Ethnicity and Health, 12(3), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850701235069

Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen. / Johnson, Michael R.; Hartzema, Abraham G.; Mills, Terry L.; De Leon, Jessica M.; Yang, Mark; Frueh, Christopher; Santos, Alberto.

In: Ethnicity and Health, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.06.2007, p. 283-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, MR, Hartzema, AG, Mills, TL, De Leon, JM, Yang, M, Frueh, C & Santos, A 2007, 'Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen', Ethnicity and Health, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850701235069
Johnson MR, Hartzema AG, Mills TL, De Leon JM, Yang M, Frueh C et al. Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen. Ethnicity and Health. 2007 Jun 1;12(3):283-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850701235069
Johnson, Michael R. ; Hartzema, Abraham G. ; Mills, Terry L. ; De Leon, Jessica M. ; Yang, Mark ; Frueh, Christopher ; Santos, Alberto. / Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen. In: Ethnicity and Health. 2007 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 283-296.
@article{52f3eddd2f9c4dbdae9ff74f85b66853,
title = "Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen",
abstract = "Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of the Brief Panic Disorder Screen (BPDS) in samples of African American and Caucasian American primary care patients. Methods. The BPDS was administered to 295 patients scheduled to visit a primary care clinic for medical reasons. The presence or absence of a panic disorder diagnosis was established during a clinical interview with a psychiatrist. Measures of reliability (internal consistency) and validity (criterion validity) were compared between the two ethnic subgroups. Findings. The BPDS demonstrated greater reliability and validity for Caucasians than African Americans. This effect was maintained even after controlling for group differences in key demographic variables. Differences between ethnic groups were apparent in both those with and those without panic disorder (PD). BPDS responses of African Americans with PD demonstrated very low internal consistency whereas a high rate of false positive PD diagnoses was related to higher than expected BPDS scores among African Americans without PD, particularly on the level of fear felt when experiencing shortness of breath or heart palpitations. Discussion. These findings support the notion that cultural differences in the language and meaning associated with anxiety disorders contribute to the difficulty of accurately diagnosing PD in primary care populations. Additional research is needed to provide a better understanding of the cultural aspects of the anxiety experience. Such research would facilitate the development of better screening tools for panic and other anxiety disorders for ethnic minority primary care populations.",
keywords = "African Americans, Panic Disorder, Primary Care, Screening",
author = "Johnson, {Michael R.} and Hartzema, {Abraham G.} and Mills, {Terry L.} and {De Leon}, {Jessica M.} and Mark Yang and Christopher Frueh and Alberto Santos",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13557850701235069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "283--296",
journal = "Ethnicity and Health",
issn = "1355-7858",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnic differences in the reliability and validity of a panic disorder screen

AU - Johnson, Michael R.

AU - Hartzema, Abraham G.

AU - Mills, Terry L.

AU - De Leon, Jessica M.

AU - Yang, Mark

AU - Frueh, Christopher

AU - Santos, Alberto

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of the Brief Panic Disorder Screen (BPDS) in samples of African American and Caucasian American primary care patients. Methods. The BPDS was administered to 295 patients scheduled to visit a primary care clinic for medical reasons. The presence or absence of a panic disorder diagnosis was established during a clinical interview with a psychiatrist. Measures of reliability (internal consistency) and validity (criterion validity) were compared between the two ethnic subgroups. Findings. The BPDS demonstrated greater reliability and validity for Caucasians than African Americans. This effect was maintained even after controlling for group differences in key demographic variables. Differences between ethnic groups were apparent in both those with and those without panic disorder (PD). BPDS responses of African Americans with PD demonstrated very low internal consistency whereas a high rate of false positive PD diagnoses was related to higher than expected BPDS scores among African Americans without PD, particularly on the level of fear felt when experiencing shortness of breath or heart palpitations. Discussion. These findings support the notion that cultural differences in the language and meaning associated with anxiety disorders contribute to the difficulty of accurately diagnosing PD in primary care populations. Additional research is needed to provide a better understanding of the cultural aspects of the anxiety experience. Such research would facilitate the development of better screening tools for panic and other anxiety disorders for ethnic minority primary care populations.

AB - Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of the Brief Panic Disorder Screen (BPDS) in samples of African American and Caucasian American primary care patients. Methods. The BPDS was administered to 295 patients scheduled to visit a primary care clinic for medical reasons. The presence or absence of a panic disorder diagnosis was established during a clinical interview with a psychiatrist. Measures of reliability (internal consistency) and validity (criterion validity) were compared between the two ethnic subgroups. Findings. The BPDS demonstrated greater reliability and validity for Caucasians than African Americans. This effect was maintained even after controlling for group differences in key demographic variables. Differences between ethnic groups were apparent in both those with and those without panic disorder (PD). BPDS responses of African Americans with PD demonstrated very low internal consistency whereas a high rate of false positive PD diagnoses was related to higher than expected BPDS scores among African Americans without PD, particularly on the level of fear felt when experiencing shortness of breath or heart palpitations. Discussion. These findings support the notion that cultural differences in the language and meaning associated with anxiety disorders contribute to the difficulty of accurately diagnosing PD in primary care populations. Additional research is needed to provide a better understanding of the cultural aspects of the anxiety experience. Such research would facilitate the development of better screening tools for panic and other anxiety disorders for ethnic minority primary care populations.

KW - African Americans

KW - Panic Disorder

KW - Primary Care

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147122044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147122044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13557850701235069

DO - 10.1080/13557850701235069

M3 - Article

C2 - 17454101

AN - SCOPUS:34147122044

VL - 12

SP - 283

EP - 296

JO - Ethnicity and Health

JF - Ethnicity and Health

SN - 1355-7858

IS - 3

ER -