Evaluation methods for the assessment of acute care nurse practitioner inserted central lines

Evidence-based strategies for practice

Jennifer Wilbeck, Marguerite Murphy, Janie Heath, Clare Thomson-Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Assessing acute care nurse practitioners' (ACNPs) procedural competence for central line insertions encourages best patient outcomes and meets requirements of national credentialing bodies. Implementation of processes to effectively evaluate procedural competence is complicated by the lack of validated, evidenced-based metrics to evaluate ACNP practices. Purpose: This article identifies validated, evidenced-based metrics to effectively evaluate ACNP procedural competencies. Methodology: A two-part literature review was performed to 1) determine competency evaluation methods for ACNP skills and to 2) evaluate the use of templates/checklists as a means to encourage compliance with national, evidence-based guidelines. Due to the lack of literature on the use of evaluation tools to assess ACNP procedural competency, literature related to medical training programs and practices was reviewed. Review of Literature: Fifteen articles were identified that met review criteria related to procedural competency evaluation. Eleven methods for competency evaluation were commonly identified in the literature; however, conclusive evidence indentifying the most effective means of procedural competency evaluation was not found. Seven studies and one expert consensus were identified related to use of standardized forms and templates/checklists to improve national guideline compliance. All studies indicated the use of standardized documentation significantly increased compliance with national guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)226-233
Number of pages8
JournalJAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Nurse Practitioners
Evidence-Based Practice
Guidelines
Checklist
Mental Competency
Credentialing
Documentation
Compliance
Consensus
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Evaluation methods for the assessment of acute care nurse practitioner inserted central lines : Evidence-based strategies for practice. / Wilbeck, Jennifer; Murphy, Marguerite; Heath, Janie; Thomson-Smith, Clare.

In: JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.01.2011, p. 226-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{956d167b41714d8cb3688bc4a206f480,
title = "Evaluation methods for the assessment of acute care nurse practitioner inserted central lines: Evidence-based strategies for practice",
abstract = "Background: Assessing acute care nurse practitioners' (ACNPs) procedural competence for central line insertions encourages best patient outcomes and meets requirements of national credentialing bodies. Implementation of processes to effectively evaluate procedural competence is complicated by the lack of validated, evidenced-based metrics to evaluate ACNP practices. Purpose: This article identifies validated, evidenced-based metrics to effectively evaluate ACNP procedural competencies. Methodology: A two-part literature review was performed to 1) determine competency evaluation methods for ACNP skills and to 2) evaluate the use of templates/checklists as a means to encourage compliance with national, evidence-based guidelines. Due to the lack of literature on the use of evaluation tools to assess ACNP procedural competency, literature related to medical training programs and practices was reviewed. Review of Literature: Fifteen articles were identified that met review criteria related to procedural competency evaluation. Eleven methods for competency evaluation were commonly identified in the literature; however, conclusive evidence indentifying the most effective means of procedural competency evaluation was not found. Seven studies and one expert consensus were identified related to use of standardized forms and templates/checklists to improve national guideline compliance. All studies indicated the use of standardized documentation significantly increased compliance with national guidelines.",
author = "Jennifer Wilbeck and Marguerite Murphy and Janie Heath and Clare Thomson-Smith",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2309/java.16-4-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "226--233",
journal = "JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access",
issn = "1552-8855",
publisher = "Association for Vascular Access",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation methods for the assessment of acute care nurse practitioner inserted central lines

T2 - Evidence-based strategies for practice

AU - Wilbeck, Jennifer

AU - Murphy, Marguerite

AU - Heath, Janie

AU - Thomson-Smith, Clare

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Background: Assessing acute care nurse practitioners' (ACNPs) procedural competence for central line insertions encourages best patient outcomes and meets requirements of national credentialing bodies. Implementation of processes to effectively evaluate procedural competence is complicated by the lack of validated, evidenced-based metrics to evaluate ACNP practices. Purpose: This article identifies validated, evidenced-based metrics to effectively evaluate ACNP procedural competencies. Methodology: A two-part literature review was performed to 1) determine competency evaluation methods for ACNP skills and to 2) evaluate the use of templates/checklists as a means to encourage compliance with national, evidence-based guidelines. Due to the lack of literature on the use of evaluation tools to assess ACNP procedural competency, literature related to medical training programs and practices was reviewed. Review of Literature: Fifteen articles were identified that met review criteria related to procedural competency evaluation. Eleven methods for competency evaluation were commonly identified in the literature; however, conclusive evidence indentifying the most effective means of procedural competency evaluation was not found. Seven studies and one expert consensus were identified related to use of standardized forms and templates/checklists to improve national guideline compliance. All studies indicated the use of standardized documentation significantly increased compliance with national guidelines.

AB - Background: Assessing acute care nurse practitioners' (ACNPs) procedural competence for central line insertions encourages best patient outcomes and meets requirements of national credentialing bodies. Implementation of processes to effectively evaluate procedural competence is complicated by the lack of validated, evidenced-based metrics to evaluate ACNP practices. Purpose: This article identifies validated, evidenced-based metrics to effectively evaluate ACNP procedural competencies. Methodology: A two-part literature review was performed to 1) determine competency evaluation methods for ACNP skills and to 2) evaluate the use of templates/checklists as a means to encourage compliance with national, evidence-based guidelines. Due to the lack of literature on the use of evaluation tools to assess ACNP procedural competency, literature related to medical training programs and practices was reviewed. Review of Literature: Fifteen articles were identified that met review criteria related to procedural competency evaluation. Eleven methods for competency evaluation were commonly identified in the literature; however, conclusive evidence indentifying the most effective means of procedural competency evaluation was not found. Seven studies and one expert consensus were identified related to use of standardized forms and templates/checklists to improve national guideline compliance. All studies indicated the use of standardized documentation significantly increased compliance with national guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856093361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856093361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2309/java.16-4-5

DO - 10.2309/java.16-4-5

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 226

EP - 233

JO - JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access

JF - JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access

SN - 1552-8855

IS - 4

ER -