Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke

Annette Johnson, D. K. Kido, W. D. Shannon, M. M. Bahn, M. H. Gado, B. C.P. Lee, C. J. Moran, F. J. Wippold, B. Littenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare a reduced (three-sequence) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol with a full (eight- to 10-sequence) MR imaging protocol in adults suspected of having stroke. Materials And Methods: Six neuroradiologists interpreted a consecutive sample of 265 MR images in patients suspected of having stroke. Each read reduced-protocol images in a discrete series of 40 patients (one read images in only 15) and corresponding full-protocol images 1 month later (reduced/full protocol). Five of the readers each read images in 10 additional cases, five each as full/full and reduced/reduced protocol controls. κ values between full and reduced protocols, reader assessment of protocol adequacy, confidence level, and need for additional sequences or examinations were evaluated. Results: In the reduced/full protocol, the κ value for detecting ischemia was 0.797; and that for detecting any clinically important abnormality, 0.635. Statistically similar κ values were found with the full/full control design (κ = 0.802 and 0.715, respectively). The full protocol was judged more adequate than the reduced protocol (2.0 of 5.0 points vs 1.6, P < .001) and generated greater diagnostic confidence (8.6 of 10.0 points vs 8.9, P = .01), less need for additional sequences (2.7 of 6.0 points vs 1.5, P < .001), and more requests for additional examinations (28.4% vs 36.3%). CONCLUSION: Disagreement between interpretations of reduced- and full-protocol images might be attributable to baseline-level intra-observer inconsistency, as demonstrated in control designs. A greater number of sequences did not lead to greater consistency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)791-797
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume218
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stroke
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Ischemia

Keywords

  • Brain, MR
  • Brain, ischemia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Johnson, A., Kido, D. K., Shannon, W. D., Bahn, M. M., Gado, M. H., Lee, B. C. P., ... Littenberg, B. (2001). Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke. Radiology, 218(3), 791-797. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr32791

Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke. / Johnson, Annette; Kido, D. K.; Shannon, W. D.; Bahn, M. M.; Gado, M. H.; Lee, B. C.P.; Moran, C. J.; Wippold, F. J.; Littenberg, B.

In: Radiology, Vol. 218, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 791-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, A, Kido, DK, Shannon, WD, Bahn, MM, Gado, MH, Lee, BCP, Moran, CJ, Wippold, FJ & Littenberg, B 2001, 'Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke', Radiology, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 791-797. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr32791
Johnson, Annette ; Kido, D. K. ; Shannon, W. D. ; Bahn, M. M. ; Gado, M. H. ; Lee, B. C.P. ; Moran, C. J. ; Wippold, F. J. ; Littenberg, B. / Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke. In: Radiology. 2001 ; Vol. 218, No. 3. pp. 791-797.
@article{dfd8e51cd26245379b1684c2a449f676,
title = "Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare a reduced (three-sequence) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol with a full (eight- to 10-sequence) MR imaging protocol in adults suspected of having stroke. Materials And Methods: Six neuroradiologists interpreted a consecutive sample of 265 MR images in patients suspected of having stroke. Each read reduced-protocol images in a discrete series of 40 patients (one read images in only 15) and corresponding full-protocol images 1 month later (reduced/full protocol). Five of the readers each read images in 10 additional cases, five each as full/full and reduced/reduced protocol controls. κ values between full and reduced protocols, reader assessment of protocol adequacy, confidence level, and need for additional sequences or examinations were evaluated. Results: In the reduced/full protocol, the κ value for detecting ischemia was 0.797; and that for detecting any clinically important abnormality, 0.635. Statistically similar κ values were found with the full/full control design (κ = 0.802 and 0.715, respectively). The full protocol was judged more adequate than the reduced protocol (2.0 of 5.0 points vs 1.6, P < .001) and generated greater diagnostic confidence (8.6 of 10.0 points vs 8.9, P = .01), less need for additional sequences (2.7 of 6.0 points vs 1.5, P < .001), and more requests for additional examinations (28.4{\%} vs 36.3{\%}). CONCLUSION: Disagreement between interpretations of reduced- and full-protocol images might be attributable to baseline-level intra-observer inconsistency, as demonstrated in control designs. A greater number of sequences did not lead to greater consistency.",
keywords = "Brain, MR, Brain, ischemia",
author = "Annette Johnson and Kido, {D. K.} and Shannon, {W. D.} and Bahn, {M. M.} and Gado, {M. H.} and Lee, {B. C.P.} and Moran, {C. J.} and Wippold, {F. J.} and B. Littenberg",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr32791",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "218",
pages = "791--797",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a reduced MR imaging sequencing protocol in adult patients with stroke

AU - Johnson, Annette

AU - Kido, D. K.

AU - Shannon, W. D.

AU - Bahn, M. M.

AU - Gado, M. H.

AU - Lee, B. C.P.

AU - Moran, C. J.

AU - Wippold, F. J.

AU - Littenberg, B.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare a reduced (three-sequence) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol with a full (eight- to 10-sequence) MR imaging protocol in adults suspected of having stroke. Materials And Methods: Six neuroradiologists interpreted a consecutive sample of 265 MR images in patients suspected of having stroke. Each read reduced-protocol images in a discrete series of 40 patients (one read images in only 15) and corresponding full-protocol images 1 month later (reduced/full protocol). Five of the readers each read images in 10 additional cases, five each as full/full and reduced/reduced protocol controls. κ values between full and reduced protocols, reader assessment of protocol adequacy, confidence level, and need for additional sequences or examinations were evaluated. Results: In the reduced/full protocol, the κ value for detecting ischemia was 0.797; and that for detecting any clinically important abnormality, 0.635. Statistically similar κ values were found with the full/full control design (κ = 0.802 and 0.715, respectively). The full protocol was judged more adequate than the reduced protocol (2.0 of 5.0 points vs 1.6, P < .001) and generated greater diagnostic confidence (8.6 of 10.0 points vs 8.9, P = .01), less need for additional sequences (2.7 of 6.0 points vs 1.5, P < .001), and more requests for additional examinations (28.4% vs 36.3%). CONCLUSION: Disagreement between interpretations of reduced- and full-protocol images might be attributable to baseline-level intra-observer inconsistency, as demonstrated in control designs. A greater number of sequences did not lead to greater consistency.

AB - Purpose: To compare a reduced (three-sequence) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol with a full (eight- to 10-sequence) MR imaging protocol in adults suspected of having stroke. Materials And Methods: Six neuroradiologists interpreted a consecutive sample of 265 MR images in patients suspected of having stroke. Each read reduced-protocol images in a discrete series of 40 patients (one read images in only 15) and corresponding full-protocol images 1 month later (reduced/full protocol). Five of the readers each read images in 10 additional cases, five each as full/full and reduced/reduced protocol controls. κ values between full and reduced protocols, reader assessment of protocol adequacy, confidence level, and need for additional sequences or examinations were evaluated. Results: In the reduced/full protocol, the κ value for detecting ischemia was 0.797; and that for detecting any clinically important abnormality, 0.635. Statistically similar κ values were found with the full/full control design (κ = 0.802 and 0.715, respectively). The full protocol was judged more adequate than the reduced protocol (2.0 of 5.0 points vs 1.6, P < .001) and generated greater diagnostic confidence (8.6 of 10.0 points vs 8.9, P = .01), less need for additional sequences (2.7 of 6.0 points vs 1.5, P < .001), and more requests for additional examinations (28.4% vs 36.3%). CONCLUSION: Disagreement between interpretations of reduced- and full-protocol images might be attributable to baseline-level intra-observer inconsistency, as demonstrated in control designs. A greater number of sequences did not lead to greater consistency.

KW - Brain, MR

KW - Brain, ischemia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035117901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035117901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr32791

DO - 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr32791

M3 - Article

C2 - 11230658

AN - SCOPUS:0035117901

VL - 218

SP - 791

EP - 797

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -