Evaluation of constipation in older adults: Radioopaque markers (ROMs) versus wireless motility capsule (WMC)

Satish Sanku Chander Rao, E. Coss-Adame, J. Valestin, K. Mysore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is scarce information regarding assessment of constipation in older subjects. We examined regional and whole-gut transit time (WGTT) with wireless motility capsule (WMC) and compared this with radioopaque markers (ROM) transit. 39 constipated and 11 healthy older subjects (≥65 years) ingested a ROM capsule and WMC, wore a data receiver and kept stool diaries for 5 days. WMC recordings were analyzed for colonic transit time (CTT), WGTT and gastric emptying time (GET). Radiographs obtained on day 5 assessed ROM transit. Results for each device were compared. The CTT (p= <0.0001), WGTT (p= <0.001) and GET (p= <0.04) as measured by WMC were all slower in constipated subjects compared to healthy subjects. ROM colonic transit was also slower (p= <0.007) in constipated compared to healthy subjects. The diagnostic utility for identifying subjects with constipation as assessed by receiver operating characteristics were similar; 0.85 (WMC) versus 0.73 (ROM). Device agreement for slow colonic transit was 88% with good correlation between WMC and ROM (CTT r= 0.718, p= 0.0001, WGTT r= 0.693, p= 0.0001). Slow transit constipation was identified in 28% with ROM and 32% with WMC. No adverse events were recorded. WMC is a safe and useful device that provides objective diagnosis of delayed colonic and whole gut transit in older constipated adults. It is a radiation-free, physiologic and ambulatory technique that provides additional diagnostic information than ROM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-294
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Constipation
Capsules
evaluation
Healthy Volunteers
Gastric Emptying
Equipment and Supplies
diagnostic
recipient
time
Delayed Diagnosis
ROC Curve
recording
Radiation
event

Keywords

  • Constipation
  • Older adults
  • Radio-opaque marker
  • WMC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Health(social science)
  • Gerontology

Cite this

Evaluation of constipation in older adults : Radioopaque markers (ROMs) versus wireless motility capsule (WMC). / Rao, Satish Sanku Chander; Coss-Adame, E.; Valestin, J.; Mysore, K.

In: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.09.2012, p. 289-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{384ed5deb99449a48b88a88f0ae36363,
title = "Evaluation of constipation in older adults: Radioopaque markers (ROMs) versus wireless motility capsule (WMC)",
abstract = "There is scarce information regarding assessment of constipation in older subjects. We examined regional and whole-gut transit time (WGTT) with wireless motility capsule (WMC) and compared this with radioopaque markers (ROM) transit. 39 constipated and 11 healthy older subjects (≥65 years) ingested a ROM capsule and WMC, wore a data receiver and kept stool diaries for 5 days. WMC recordings were analyzed for colonic transit time (CTT), WGTT and gastric emptying time (GET). Radiographs obtained on day 5 assessed ROM transit. Results for each device were compared. The CTT (p= <0.0001), WGTT (p= <0.001) and GET (p= <0.04) as measured by WMC were all slower in constipated subjects compared to healthy subjects. ROM colonic transit was also slower (p= <0.007) in constipated compared to healthy subjects. The diagnostic utility for identifying subjects with constipation as assessed by receiver operating characteristics were similar; 0.85 (WMC) versus 0.73 (ROM). Device agreement for slow colonic transit was 88{\%} with good correlation between WMC and ROM (CTT r= 0.718, p= 0.0001, WGTT r= 0.693, p= 0.0001). Slow transit constipation was identified in 28{\%} with ROM and 32{\%} with WMC. No adverse events were recorded. WMC is a safe and useful device that provides objective diagnosis of delayed colonic and whole gut transit in older constipated adults. It is a radiation-free, physiologic and ambulatory technique that provides additional diagnostic information than ROM.",
keywords = "Constipation, Older adults, Radio-opaque marker, WMC",
author = "Rao, {Satish Sanku Chander} and E. Coss-Adame and J. Valestin and K. Mysore",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.archger.2012.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "289--294",
journal = "Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics",
issn = "0167-4943",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of constipation in older adults

T2 - Radioopaque markers (ROMs) versus wireless motility capsule (WMC)

AU - Rao, Satish Sanku Chander

AU - Coss-Adame, E.

AU - Valestin, J.

AU - Mysore, K.

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - There is scarce information regarding assessment of constipation in older subjects. We examined regional and whole-gut transit time (WGTT) with wireless motility capsule (WMC) and compared this with radioopaque markers (ROM) transit. 39 constipated and 11 healthy older subjects (≥65 years) ingested a ROM capsule and WMC, wore a data receiver and kept stool diaries for 5 days. WMC recordings were analyzed for colonic transit time (CTT), WGTT and gastric emptying time (GET). Radiographs obtained on day 5 assessed ROM transit. Results for each device were compared. The CTT (p= <0.0001), WGTT (p= <0.001) and GET (p= <0.04) as measured by WMC were all slower in constipated subjects compared to healthy subjects. ROM colonic transit was also slower (p= <0.007) in constipated compared to healthy subjects. The diagnostic utility for identifying subjects with constipation as assessed by receiver operating characteristics were similar; 0.85 (WMC) versus 0.73 (ROM). Device agreement for slow colonic transit was 88% with good correlation between WMC and ROM (CTT r= 0.718, p= 0.0001, WGTT r= 0.693, p= 0.0001). Slow transit constipation was identified in 28% with ROM and 32% with WMC. No adverse events were recorded. WMC is a safe and useful device that provides objective diagnosis of delayed colonic and whole gut transit in older constipated adults. It is a radiation-free, physiologic and ambulatory technique that provides additional diagnostic information than ROM.

AB - There is scarce information regarding assessment of constipation in older subjects. We examined regional and whole-gut transit time (WGTT) with wireless motility capsule (WMC) and compared this with radioopaque markers (ROM) transit. 39 constipated and 11 healthy older subjects (≥65 years) ingested a ROM capsule and WMC, wore a data receiver and kept stool diaries for 5 days. WMC recordings were analyzed for colonic transit time (CTT), WGTT and gastric emptying time (GET). Radiographs obtained on day 5 assessed ROM transit. Results for each device were compared. The CTT (p= <0.0001), WGTT (p= <0.001) and GET (p= <0.04) as measured by WMC were all slower in constipated subjects compared to healthy subjects. ROM colonic transit was also slower (p= <0.007) in constipated compared to healthy subjects. The diagnostic utility for identifying subjects with constipation as assessed by receiver operating characteristics were similar; 0.85 (WMC) versus 0.73 (ROM). Device agreement for slow colonic transit was 88% with good correlation between WMC and ROM (CTT r= 0.718, p= 0.0001, WGTT r= 0.693, p= 0.0001). Slow transit constipation was identified in 28% with ROM and 32% with WMC. No adverse events were recorded. WMC is a safe and useful device that provides objective diagnosis of delayed colonic and whole gut transit in older constipated adults. It is a radiation-free, physiologic and ambulatory technique that provides additional diagnostic information than ROM.

KW - Constipation

KW - Older adults

KW - Radio-opaque marker

KW - WMC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864935135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864935135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.archger.2012.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.archger.2012.04.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 22572600

AN - SCOPUS:84864935135

VL - 55

SP - 289

EP - 294

JO - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

JF - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

SN - 0167-4943

IS - 2

ER -