Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system

Jian Yue Jin, Samuel Ryu, Jack Rock, Kathleen Faber, Qing Chen, Munther Ajlouni, Benjamin Movsas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7±1.8, 0.7±1.5, and 0.7±1.6 deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1±0.9, 0.2±1.2, and 0.2±1.0 mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1087-1093
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Radiosurgery
Uncertainty
Yaws

Keywords

  • Image fusion
  • Image guided radiotherapy
  • Intrafraction motion
  • Position uncertainty
  • Spinal radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Jin, J. Y., Ryu, S., Rock, J., Faber, K., Chen, Q., Ajlouni, M., & Movsas, B. (2008). Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system. Medical Physics, 35(3), 1087-1093. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2839097

Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system. / Jin, Jian Yue; Ryu, Samuel; Rock, Jack; Faber, Kathleen; Chen, Qing; Ajlouni, Munther; Movsas, Benjamin.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2008, p. 1087-1093.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jin, JY, Ryu, S, Rock, J, Faber, K, Chen, Q, Ajlouni, M & Movsas, B 2008, 'Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system', Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1087-1093. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2839097
Jin, Jian Yue ; Ryu, Samuel ; Rock, Jack ; Faber, Kathleen ; Chen, Qing ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Movsas, Benjamin. / Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system. In: Medical Physics. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 1087-1093.
@article{e232a51e84b24a448c0d0440a3410956,
title = "Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system",
abstract = "Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7±1.8, 0.7±1.5, and 0.7±1.6 deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1±0.9, 0.2±1.2, and 0.2±1.0 mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.",
keywords = "Image fusion, Image guided radiotherapy, Intrafraction motion, Position uncertainty, Spinal radiotherapy",
author = "Jin, {Jian Yue} and Samuel Ryu and Jack Rock and Kathleen Faber and Qing Chen and Munther Ajlouni and Benjamin Movsas",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1118/1.2839097",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1087--1093",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system

AU - Jin, Jian Yue

AU - Ryu, Samuel

AU - Rock, Jack

AU - Faber, Kathleen

AU - Chen, Qing

AU - Ajlouni, Munther

AU - Movsas, Benjamin

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7±1.8, 0.7±1.5, and 0.7±1.6 deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1±0.9, 0.2±1.2, and 0.2±1.0 mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.

AB - Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7±1.8, 0.7±1.5, and 0.7±1.6 deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1±0.9, 0.2±1.2, and 0.2±1.0 mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.

KW - Image fusion

KW - Image guided radiotherapy

KW - Intrafraction motion

KW - Position uncertainty

KW - Spinal radiotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40049112446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40049112446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2839097

DO - 10.1118/1.2839097

M3 - Article

C2 - 18404943

AN - SCOPUS:40049112446

VL - 35

SP - 1087

EP - 1093

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 3

ER -