Evaluation of the prognostic value of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein in epithelial ovarian cancer using automated quantitative protein analysis

Amanda Psyrri, Ziwei Yu, Aris Bamias, Paul M. Weinberger, Sonia Markakis, Diane Kowalski, Robert L. Camp, David L. Rimm, Meletios A. Dimopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein (cIAP) is regarded as an important prognostic biomarker in cancer. Here, we sought to determine the prognostic value of cIAP protein levels in epithelial ovarian cancer using a novel method of compartmentalized in situ protein analysis. Methods: A tissue array composed of 150 advanced-stage ovarian cancers, treated with surgical debulking followed by platinum/paclitaxel-based combination chemotherapy, was constructed. For evaluation of protein expression, we used an immunofluorescence-based method of automated in situ quantitative measurement of protein analysis. Results: The mean follow-up time for the entire cohort was 34.4 months. Patients with tumors bearing high cIAP membranous expression had a 3-year survival rate of 31% compared with 73% for patients with low cIAP expressing tumors (P = 0.0020). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for well-characterized prognostic variables, low membranous cIAP expression level was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival. Conclusions: Our results indicate that cIAP protein levels have prognostic value in ovarian cancer patients. Modulation of cIAP levels may improve clinical outcome in ovarian cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1179-1183
Number of pages5
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the prognostic value of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein in epithelial ovarian cancer using automated quantitative protein analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this