Evaluation of two rodent delayed-response memory tasks: A method with retractable levers versus a method with closing doors

F. Fay Evans-Martin, Alvin V Terry, William J. Jackson, Jerry J. Buccafusco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare two similar rodent memory tasks developed in our laboratory that employ stimulus discrimination and delayed response (light and tone stimuli and variable length delays) and to determine their sensitivity to the muscarinic-acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonist, scopolamine hydrobromide (SCOP HBr), and its quaternary (methylbromide) analog (SCOP MBr). Male Wistar rats were trained in either an open chamber that employed retracting levers (RLM) during the delays, or a method that utilized closing doors (CDM) that separated the rats from the levers during delays to reduce positional (nonmnemonic) strategies. When the rats were well trained, dose-effect studies (μg/kg doses, s.c., 30 min before test sessions) of SCOP HBr or MBr were performed. Baseline performance was characterized by delay-dependent decreases in accuracy in both methods except when the tone was the stimulus in the RLM. SCOP HBr impaired performance in both tasks at the higher doses tested, although the effects were more consistent in the CDM task and accuracy associated with each stimulus was affected similarly. Surprisingly, SCOP MBr also impaired performance of each task, especially when the tone was the stimulus, while accuracy associated with the light was not affected in the CDM task. Overall, the results indicated that the CDM was a somewhat more reliable task, appearing to reduce positional strategies with less variability in response to the mAChR antagonists, although some stimulus-modality specific effects were noted. It also appears important to consider the peripheral effects of mAChR antagonists (and potential central effects of quaternary mAChR antagonists) when interpreting results from behavioral studies, especially those involving conditional discrimination and delayed response. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-241
Number of pages9
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume70
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Repression (Psychology)
Cholinergic Antagonists
Muscarinic Receptors
Scopolamine Hydrobromide
Rodentia
methyl bromide
Light
Task Performance and Analysis
Wistar Rats

Keywords

  • Acetylcholine
  • Antagonist
  • Muscarinic
  • Operant procedure
  • Rat
  • Scopolamine
  • Stimulus discrimination
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Evaluation of two rodent delayed-response memory tasks : A method with retractable levers versus a method with closing doors. / Evans-Martin, F. Fay; Terry, Alvin V; Jackson, William J.; Buccafusco, Jerry J.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 70, No. 3-4, 01.01.2000, p. 233-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans-Martin, F. Fay ; Terry, Alvin V ; Jackson, William J. ; Buccafusco, Jerry J. / Evaluation of two rodent delayed-response memory tasks : A method with retractable levers versus a method with closing doors. In: Physiology and Behavior. 2000 ; Vol. 70, No. 3-4. pp. 233-241.
@article{69182c3d13a24b8f8aebee1d04847125,
title = "Evaluation of two rodent delayed-response memory tasks: A method with retractable levers versus a method with closing doors",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare two similar rodent memory tasks developed in our laboratory that employ stimulus discrimination and delayed response (light and tone stimuli and variable length delays) and to determine their sensitivity to the muscarinic-acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonist, scopolamine hydrobromide (SCOP HBr), and its quaternary (methylbromide) analog (SCOP MBr). Male Wistar rats were trained in either an open chamber that employed retracting levers (RLM) during the delays, or a method that utilized closing doors (CDM) that separated the rats from the levers during delays to reduce positional (nonmnemonic) strategies. When the rats were well trained, dose-effect studies (μg/kg doses, s.c., 30 min before test sessions) of SCOP HBr or MBr were performed. Baseline performance was characterized by delay-dependent decreases in accuracy in both methods except when the tone was the stimulus in the RLM. SCOP HBr impaired performance in both tasks at the higher doses tested, although the effects were more consistent in the CDM task and accuracy associated with each stimulus was affected similarly. Surprisingly, SCOP MBr also impaired performance of each task, especially when the tone was the stimulus, while accuracy associated with the light was not affected in the CDM task. Overall, the results indicated that the CDM was a somewhat more reliable task, appearing to reduce positional strategies with less variability in response to the mAChR antagonists, although some stimulus-modality specific effects were noted. It also appears important to consider the peripheral effects of mAChR antagonists (and potential central effects of quaternary mAChR antagonists) when interpreting results from behavioral studies, especially those involving conditional discrimination and delayed response. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.",
keywords = "Acetylcholine, Antagonist, Muscarinic, Operant procedure, Rat, Scopolamine, Stimulus discrimination, Working memory",
author = "Evans-Martin, {F. Fay} and Terry, {Alvin V} and Jackson, {William J.} and Buccafusco, {Jerry J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00233-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "233--241",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of two rodent delayed-response memory tasks

T2 - A method with retractable levers versus a method with closing doors

AU - Evans-Martin, F. Fay

AU - Terry, Alvin V

AU - Jackson, William J.

AU - Buccafusco, Jerry J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare two similar rodent memory tasks developed in our laboratory that employ stimulus discrimination and delayed response (light and tone stimuli and variable length delays) and to determine their sensitivity to the muscarinic-acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonist, scopolamine hydrobromide (SCOP HBr), and its quaternary (methylbromide) analog (SCOP MBr). Male Wistar rats were trained in either an open chamber that employed retracting levers (RLM) during the delays, or a method that utilized closing doors (CDM) that separated the rats from the levers during delays to reduce positional (nonmnemonic) strategies. When the rats were well trained, dose-effect studies (μg/kg doses, s.c., 30 min before test sessions) of SCOP HBr or MBr were performed. Baseline performance was characterized by delay-dependent decreases in accuracy in both methods except when the tone was the stimulus in the RLM. SCOP HBr impaired performance in both tasks at the higher doses tested, although the effects were more consistent in the CDM task and accuracy associated with each stimulus was affected similarly. Surprisingly, SCOP MBr also impaired performance of each task, especially when the tone was the stimulus, while accuracy associated with the light was not affected in the CDM task. Overall, the results indicated that the CDM was a somewhat more reliable task, appearing to reduce positional strategies with less variability in response to the mAChR antagonists, although some stimulus-modality specific effects were noted. It also appears important to consider the peripheral effects of mAChR antagonists (and potential central effects of quaternary mAChR antagonists) when interpreting results from behavioral studies, especially those involving conditional discrimination and delayed response. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare two similar rodent memory tasks developed in our laboratory that employ stimulus discrimination and delayed response (light and tone stimuli and variable length delays) and to determine their sensitivity to the muscarinic-acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonist, scopolamine hydrobromide (SCOP HBr), and its quaternary (methylbromide) analog (SCOP MBr). Male Wistar rats were trained in either an open chamber that employed retracting levers (RLM) during the delays, or a method that utilized closing doors (CDM) that separated the rats from the levers during delays to reduce positional (nonmnemonic) strategies. When the rats were well trained, dose-effect studies (μg/kg doses, s.c., 30 min before test sessions) of SCOP HBr or MBr were performed. Baseline performance was characterized by delay-dependent decreases in accuracy in both methods except when the tone was the stimulus in the RLM. SCOP HBr impaired performance in both tasks at the higher doses tested, although the effects were more consistent in the CDM task and accuracy associated with each stimulus was affected similarly. Surprisingly, SCOP MBr also impaired performance of each task, especially when the tone was the stimulus, while accuracy associated with the light was not affected in the CDM task. Overall, the results indicated that the CDM was a somewhat more reliable task, appearing to reduce positional strategies with less variability in response to the mAChR antagonists, although some stimulus-modality specific effects were noted. It also appears important to consider the peripheral effects of mAChR antagonists (and potential central effects of quaternary mAChR antagonists) when interpreting results from behavioral studies, especially those involving conditional discrimination and delayed response. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

KW - Acetylcholine

KW - Antagonist

KW - Muscarinic

KW - Operant procedure

KW - Rat

KW - Scopolamine

KW - Stimulus discrimination

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033830732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033830732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00233-X

DO - 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00233-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 11006421

AN - SCOPUS:0033830732

VL - 70

SP - 233

EP - 241

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

IS - 3-4

ER -